IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i5p711-719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of parents' and social workers' assessments of the quality of life of children at risk

Author

Listed:
  • Davidson-Arad, Bilha
  • Kaznelson, Hagith

Abstract

This study compares parents' and social workers' assessments of the quality of life (QOL) of children at risk and the contribution to these assessments of parents' economic status, receipt of professional intervention, and cooperation. The QOL of 52 children at risk, half who had been removed from home, half who were kept at home, was assessed by their parents and social workers, using a questionnaire based on Shye's Systemic Quality of Life Model. The parents rated the children's QOL in both settings higher than their social workers. However the disparity between the parents' ratings of the children's OQL in the two settings was smaller than that of the social workers. Moreover, the parents' economic status contributed to their own assessments, but not to the social workers'. Their cooperation contributed more to the social workers' assessments than to their own. The receipt of professional intervention contributed only to the social workers' assessments. The many differences in their QOL assessments underscore the need for a greater dialogue between social workers and parents, especially for a timely dialogue on the outcomes of the interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Davidson-Arad, Bilha & Kaznelson, Hagith, 2010. "Comparison of parents' and social workers' assessments of the quality of life of children at risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 711-719, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:5:p:711-719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00013-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poertner, John & McDonald, Thomas P. & Murray, Cyndie, 2000. "Child welfare outcomes revisited," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(9-10), pages 789-810.
    2. Marie-Christine Taillefer & Gilles Dupuis & Marie-Anne Roberge & Sylvie LeMay, 2003. "Health-Related Quality of Life Models: Systematic Review of the Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 293-323, November.
    3. Arad-Davidzon, Bilhah & Benbenishty, Rami, 2008. "The role of workers' attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers' assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 107-121, January.
    4. Harnett, Paul H., 2007. "A procedure for assessing parents' capacity for change in child protection cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1179-1188, September.
    5. Samuel Shye, 1989. "The systemic life quality model: A basis for urban renewal evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 343-378, August.
    6. Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Drake, Brett & Kohl, Patricia L., 2009. "Is the overrepresentation of the poor in child welfare caseloads due to bias or need?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 422-427, March.
    7. Bilha Davidson-Arad & Rachel Dekel & Yochanan Wozner, 2004. "Correspondence in Residents' and Staff Members' Assessments of the Quality of Life of Children in Residential Care Facilities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 77-89, August.
    8. Fernandez, Elizabeth, 2007. "Supporting children and responding to their families: Capturing the evidence on family support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1368-1394, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arbeiter, Ere & Toros, Karmen, 2017. "Participatory discourse: Engagement in the context of child protection assessment practices from the perspectives of child protection workers, parents and children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 17-27.
    2. Wilson, Samita & Hean, Sarah & Abebe, Tatek & Heaslip, Vanessa, 2020. "Children’s experiences with Child Protection Services: A synthesis of qualitative evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Toros, Karmen & DiNitto, Diana Maria & Tiko, Anne, 2018. "Family engagement in the child welfare system: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 598-607.
    4. Toros, Karmen & Tiko, Anne & Saia, Koidu, 2013. "Child-centered approach in the context of the assessment of children in need: Reflections of child protection workers in Estonia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1015-1022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Shye, 2010. "The Motivation to Volunteer: A Systemic Quality of Life Theory," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 183-200, September.
    2. Davidson-Arad, Bilha & Klein, Adva, 2011. "Comparative well being of Israeli youngsters in residential care with and without siblings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2152-2159.
    3. Davidson-Arad, Bilha, 2005. "Fifteen-month follow-up of children at risk: Comparison of the quality of life of children removed from home and children remaining at home," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Maya Benish-Weisman & Samuel Shye, 2011. "Life Quality of Russian Immigrants to Israel: Patterns of Success and of Unsuccess," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 461-479, May.
    5. Font, Sarah A. & Berger, Lawrence M. & Slack, Kristen S., 2012. "Examining racial disproportionality in child protective services case decisions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2188-2200.
    6. Guo, Jing & Huang, Ning & Fu, Mingqi & Ma, Shuang & Chen, Minglong & Wang, Xiaohua & Feng, Xing Lin & Zhang, Bo, 2021. "Social support as a mediator between internet addiction and quality of life among Chinese high school students," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Bilha Davidson-Arad & Rachel Dekel & Yochanan Wozner, 2004. "Correspondence in Residents' and Staff Members' Assessments of the Quality of Life of Children in Residential Care Facilities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 77-89, August.
    8. Bywaters, Paul & Brady, Geraldine & Sparks, Tim & Bos, Elizabeth & Bunting, Lisa & Daniel, Brigid & Featherstone, Brid & Morris, Kate & Scourfield, Jonathan, 2015. "Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-105.
    9. Simon, James David & D'Andrade, Amy & Hsu, Hsun-Ta, 2021. "The intersection of child welfare services and public assistance: An analysis of dual-system involvement and successful family preservation completion on a maltreatment re-report," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Emily Keddell, 2022. "Mechanisms of Inequity: The Impact of Instrumental Biases in the Child Protection System," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Venables, Jemma, 2019. "Practitioner perspectives on implementing an alternative response in statutory child protection: The role of local practice context and leadership teams in shaping practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Millett, Lina Sapokaite & Ben-David, Vered & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Echele, Greg & Moussette, Pam & Atkins, Valerie, 2016. "Understanding change among multi-problem families: Learnings from a formative program assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 176-183.
    13. Platt, Dendy & Riches, Katie & Wijedasa, Dinithi & Wood, Marsha, 2020. "Assessment of parental capacity to change where children may be at risk of harm: Evaluation of the C-Change pilot project," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Musa Pazhuhan & Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki & Niloofar Kaveerad & Sirio Cividino & Matteo Clemente & Luca Salvati, 2020. "Factors Underlying Life Quality in Urban Contexts: Evidence from an Industrial City (Arak, Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. de Kwaadsteniet, Leontien & Bartelink, Cora & Witteman, Cilia & ten Berge, Ingrid & van Yperen, Tom, 2013. "Improved decision making about suspected child maltreatment: Results of structuring the decision process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 347-352.
    16. Samuel Shye & Ido Haber, 2020. "Risk as Challenge: A Dual System Stochastic Model for Binary Choice Behavior," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 33-50, March.
    17. McLaughlin, Michael & Jonson-Reid, Melissa, 2017. "The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 407-412.
    18. Keddell, Emily & Davie, Gabrielle & Barson, Dave, 2019. "Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Social gradient and the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Andrés A. Agudelo-Suárez & Annie M. Vivares-Builes & Natalia Muñoz-Pino & José Miguel Martínez-Martínez & Alison Reid & Elena Ronda-Pérez, 2019. "Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Native and Immigrant Populations in the PELFI Study in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Noortje M Pannebakker & Paul L Kocken & Paula van Dommelen & Krista van Mourik & Ria Reis & Sijmen A Reijneveld & Mattijs E Numans, 2020. "Care use and its intensity in children with complex problems are related to varying child and family factors: A follow-up study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:5:p:711-719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.