IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v31y2009i12p1222-1228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying

Author

Listed:
  • Mishna, Faye
  • Saini, Michael
  • Solomon, Steven

Abstract

The use of online technology is exploding worldwide and is fast becoming a preferred method of interacting. While most online interactions are neutral or positive the Internet provides a new means through which children and youth are bullied. The aim of this grounded theory approach was to explore technology, virtual relationships and cyber bullying from the perspectives of students. Seven focus groups were held with 38 students between fifth and eighth grades. The participants considered cyber bullying to be a serious problem and some characterized online bullying as more serious than 'traditional' bullying because of the associated anonymity. Although the students depicted anonymity as integral to cyber bullying, the findings suggest that much of the cyber bullying occurred within the context of their social groups and relationships. Findings revealed five major themes: technology embraced at younger ages and becoming the dominant medium for communication; definitions and views of cyber bullying; factors unique to cyber bullying; types of cyber bullying; and telling adults. The findings highlight the complexity of the perceived anonymity provided by the Internet and how this may impact cyber bullying. The study offers greater awareness of the meanings of online relationships for children and youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishna, Faye & Saini, Michael & Solomon, Steven, 2009. "Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1222-1228, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:12:p:1222-1228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(09)00120-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marilyn J. Hoppe & Elizabeth A. Wells & Diane M. Morrison & Mary R. Gillmore & Anthony Wilsdon, 1995. "Using Focus Groups to Discuss Sensitive Topics with Children," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(1), pages 102-114, February.
    2. Sonia Livingstone & Leslie Haddon, 2008. "Risky experiences for children online: charting European research on children and the Internet," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27076, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Royen, Kathleen & Poels, Karolien & Vandebosch, Heidi, 2016. "Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-41.
    2. Shuhuan Zhou, 2021. "Status and Risk Factors of Chinese Teenagers’ Exposure to Cyberbullying," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Sebastian Wachs & Juan Manuel Machimbarrena & Michelle F. Wright & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Soeun Yang & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskalou & , 2022. "Associations between Coping Strategies and Cyberhate Involvement: Evidence from Adolescents across Three World Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Marín-López, Inmaculada & Zych, Izabela & Ortega-Ruiz, Rosario & Hunter, Simon C. & Llorent, Vicente J., 2020. "Relations among online emotional content use, social and emotional competencies and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Park, Sora & Na, Eun-Yeong & Kim, Eun-mee, 2014. "The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 74-81.
    6. Kim, Joonggon & Shim, Hee Sub & Hay, Carter, 2020. "Unpacking the dynamics involved in the impact of bullying victimization on adolescent suicidal ideation: Testing general strain theory in the Korean context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Mary Callaghan & Colette Kelly & Michal Molcho, 2015. "Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(2), pages 199-206, February.
    8. Hong, Jun Sung & Cho, Hyunkag & Allen-Meares, Paula & Espelage, Dorothy L., 2011. "The social ecology of the Columbine High School shootings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 861-868, June.
    9. Mishna, Faye & Khoury-Kassabri, Mona & Schwan, Kaitlin & Wiener, Judith & Craig, Wendy & Beran, Tanya & Pepler, Debra & Daciuk, Joanne, 2016. "The contribution of social support to children and adolescents' self-perception: The mediating role of bullying victimization," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 120-127.
    10. Mohammad Amin Wani & R Sankar & Anicham J, 2017. "Assessment of Cyber bullying and Emotional Stability among Higher Secondary Students," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 1(1), pages 178-183, June.
    11. Kyung Im Kang & Kyonghwa Kang & Chanhee Kim, 2021. "Risk Factors Influencing Cyberbullying Perpetration among Middle School Students in Korea: Analysis Using the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Låftman, Sara Brolin & Modin, Bitte & Östberg, Viveca, 2013. "Cyberbullying and subjective health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-119.
    13. Niels C.L. Jacobs & Linda Goossens & Francine Dehue & Trijntje Völlink & Lilian Lechner, 2015. "Dutch Cyberbullying Victims’ Experiences, Perceptions, Attitudes and Motivations Related to (Coping with) Cyberbullying: Focus Group Interviews," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Jessica Ortega-Barón & Sofía Buelga & Ester Ayllón & Belén Martínez-Ferrer & María-Jesús Cava, 2019. "Effects of Intervention Program Prev@cib on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Li, Jiameng & Sidibe, Aissata Mahamadou & Shen, Xiaoyun & Hesketh, Therese, 2019. "Incidence, risk factors and psychosomatic symptoms for traditional bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Hayoung Kim Donnelly & Yoonsun Han & Juyoung Song & Tae Min Song, 2019. "Application of Social Big Data to Identify Trends of School Bullying Forms in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Eliot Simangunsong, 2020. "Cyberbullying: Identification Of Factors Affecting The Quality Of Higher Education In Indonesia," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 15-19, January.
    18. Stuart, Jaimee & Scott, Riley & Smith, Calvin & Speechley, Molly, 2022. "Parents' anticipated responses to children's cyberbullying experiences; Action, Education and Emotion," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    19. Dennehy, Rebecca & Meaney, Sarah & Cronin, Mary & Arensman, Ella, 2020. "The psychosocial impacts of cybervictimisation and barriers to seeking social support: Young people’s perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Qianjia Huang & Vivek K. Singh & Pradeep K. Atrey, 2018. "On cyberbullying incidents and underlying online social relationships," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 241-260, September.
    21. Shechory Bitton, Mally & Cohen Medina, Hagit, 2015. "Problematic internet use and sensation seeking: Differences between teens who live at home and in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 35-40.
    22. Kim, Bu Kyung & Park, Jisu & Jung, Hi Jae & Han, Yoonsun, 2020. "Latent profiles of offline/cyber bullying experiences among Korean students and its relationship with peer conformity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    23. Sohni Siddiqui & Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, 2023. "Successful and Emerging Cyberbullying Prevention Programs: A Narrative Review of Seventeen Interventions Applied Worldwide," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabueva, Larisa (Габуева, Лариса) & Pavlova, Natalia (Павлова, Наталья), 2016. "Grounds for Development Prospects of Onerous Health Services Cluster [Обоснование Перспектив Развития Кластера Возмездных Услуг Здравоохранения]," Working Papers 1444, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. Altuna, Jon & Martínez-de-Morentin, Juan-Ignacio & Lareki, Arkaitz, 2020. "The impact of becoming a parent about the perception of Internet risk behaviors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Parton, Nigel, 2009. "Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the 'social' to the 'informational'?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 715-721, July.
    4. Sonia Livingstone & Ellen Helsper, 2010. "Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35373, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Suzan M Doornwaard & Tom F M ter Bogt & Ellen Reitz & Regina J J M van den Eijnden, 2015. "Sex-Related Online Behaviors, Perceived Peer Norms and Adolescents’ Experience with Sexual Behavior: Testing an Integrative Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Agapito, Dora & Brito, Pedro Q., 2020. "A Dyadic Approach To Adolescents’ Risky Online Behaviors," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(3), pages 244-267.
    7. Vilmantė Pakalniškienė & Roma Jusienė & Sandra B. Sebre & Jennifer Chun-Li Wu & Ilona Laurinaitytė, 2020. "Children’s Internet Use Profiles in Relation to Behavioral Problems in Lithuania, Latvia, and Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:12:p:1222-1228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.