IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v31y2009i7p715-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the 'social' to the 'informational'?

Author

Listed:
  • Parton, Nigel

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of an important debate about whether and how far social work practice with children and families is being dominated by a relatively narrow and often legalistic focus on child protection, at the cost of the broader concern with ensuring the welfare of children. Family support is often the operative word used to address the child welfare focus but scholars in the field still wonder whether our new technologically based systems can accommodate broader concerns. Perhaps the centrality of procedures has overshadowed what social work practitioners used to value as good judgment, including a laborious weighing of facts and practice wisdom. This paper discusses the possible impact of new information and communication technology systems. It reflects on the shift from a narrative to a database way of thinking and operating and discusses how the 'social' may be being overshadowed by the 'informational.' In doing so it attempts to identify a number of key challenges for both practice and knowledge which need to be considered in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Parton, Nigel, 2009. "Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the 'social' to the 'informational'?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 715-721, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:7:p:715-721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(09)00020-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia Livingstone & Leslie Haddon, 2008. "Risky experiences for children online: charting European research on children and the Internet," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27076, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dickens, Jonathan & Beckett, Chris & Bailey, Sue, 2014. "Justice, speed and thoroughness in child protection court proceedings: Messages from England," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-111.
    2. Skivenes, Marit & Tefre, Øyvind Samnøy, 2012. "Adoption in the child welfare system — A cross-country analysis of child welfare workers' recommendations for or against adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2220-2228.
    3. Lim, Sun Sun, 2017. "Youth workers' use of Facebook for mediated pastoralism with juvenile delinquents and youths-at-risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 139-147.
    4. Alice Gojová & Barbora Gřundělová & Kateřina Cilečková & Monika Chrenková, 2020. "Path toward a Child-Centered Approach in the Czech Social and Legal Protection of Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Lecluijze, Inge & Penders, Bart & Feron, Frans J.M. & Horstman, Klasien, 2015. "Co-production of ICT and children at risk: The introduction of the Child Index in Dutch child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 161-168.
    6. Miller, J. Jay, 2020. "Developing self-care competency among child welfare workers: A first step," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Constantino, Christopher & Randolph, Karen & Gross, Melissa & Latham, Don & Rooney, Mollie & Preshia, Elliot, 2021. "The subjective experience of information communication technology use among child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Victoria Sharley, 2020. "Identifying and Responding to Child Neglect within Schools: Differing Perspectives and the Implications for Inter-Agency Practice," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(2), pages 551-571, April.
    9. Brady, Bernadine & Canavan, John & Redmond, Susan, 2016. "Bridging the gap: Using Veerman and Van Yperen’s (2007) framework to conceptualise and develop evidence informed practice in an Irish youth work organisation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altuna, Jon & Martínez-de-Morentin, Juan-Ignacio & Lareki, Arkaitz, 2020. "The impact of becoming a parent about the perception of Internet risk behaviors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Sonia Livingstone & Ellen Helsper, 2010. "Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35373, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Suzan M Doornwaard & Tom F M ter Bogt & Ellen Reitz & Regina J J M van den Eijnden, 2015. "Sex-Related Online Behaviors, Perceived Peer Norms and Adolescents’ Experience with Sexual Behavior: Testing an Integrative Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Mishna, Faye & Saini, Michael & Solomon, Steven, 2009. "Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1222-1228, December.
    5. Agapito, Dora & Brito, Pedro Q., 2020. "A Dyadic Approach To Adolescents’ Risky Online Behaviors," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(3), pages 244-267.
    6. Vilmantė Pakalniškienė & Roma Jusienė & Sandra B. Sebre & Jennifer Chun-Li Wu & Ilona Laurinaitytė, 2020. "Children’s Internet Use Profiles in Relation to Behavioral Problems in Lithuania, Latvia, and Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:7:p:715-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.