Data-driven neighborhood selection of a Gaussian field
AbstractThe nonparametric covariance estimation of a stationary Gaussian field X observed on a lattice is investigated. To tackle this issue, a neighborhood selection procedure has been recently introduced. This procedure amounts to selecting a neighborhood by a penalization method and estimating the covariance of X in the space of Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs) with neighborhood . Such a strategy is shown to satisfy oracle inequalities as well as minimax adaptive properties. However, it suffers several drawbacks which make the method difficult to apply in practice: the penalty depends on some unknown quantities and the procedure is only defined for toroidal lattices. The contribution is threefold. Firstly, a data-driven algorithm is proposed for tuning the penalty function. Secondly, the procedure is extended to non-toroidal lattices. Thirdly, numerical study illustrates the performances of the method on simulated examples. These simulations suggest that Gaussian Markov random field selection is often a good alternative to variogram estimation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.
Volume (Year): 54 (2010)
Issue (Month): 5 (May)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Cressie, Noel & Verzelen, Nicolas, 2008. "Conditional-mean least-squares fitting of Gaussian Markov random fields to Gaussian fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2794-2807, January.
- Song, Hae-Ryoung & Fuentes, Montserrat & Ghosh, Sujit, 2008. "A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(8), pages 1681-1697, September.
- H�vard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392.
- Guyon, Xavier & Yao, Jian-feng, 1999. "On the Underfitting and Overfitting Sets of Models Chosen by Order Selection Criteria," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 221-249, August.
- IM, Hae Kyung & Stein, Michael L. & Zhu, Zhengyuan, 2007. "Semiparametric Estimation of Spectral Density With Irregular Observations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 726-735, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.