IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v175y2023ip2s0960077923009438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary dynamics with the second-order reputation in the networked N-player trust game

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Meiling
  • Li, Xuezhu
  • Zhao, Dawei
  • Xia, Chengyi

Abstract

Network science has become an emerging and promising discipline within academia, which has induced extensive concern from a diverse range of realms including economics, social and computer science, mathematics and statistical mechanics. In this work, we investigate the impact of network topology on an N-player trust game by considering the second-order reputation rule. The model consists of three types of participants: investors (trusters), trustworthy trustees, and untrustworthy trustees. Based on the underlying network topology, players will interact with their neighbors at each game round. At the end of each interaction, they will update their strategies concerning their individual payoff and reputation. Meanwhile, we use different social networks and temptations of defection to explore the effect of degree distribution and clustering coefficients on the cooperative behaviors. Besides, the steady state of systems can be arrived at through the detailed theoretical analyses, and then the evolutionary process is extensively simulated on some real-world networks. We find that the trust can be spread in different network topologies and the cooperation or trust can be maintained at the higher level even though the intensity of the dilemma is higher. In addition, under the same network structure, the higher the average degree distribution of the network, the higher the trust level; under the same average degree distribution, the higher the aggregation coefficient, the lower the trust level. Current results provide some new insights into the evolution of cooperation or trust within the structured populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Meiling & Li, Xuezhu & Zhao, Dawei & Xia, Chengyi, 2023. "Evolutionary dynamics with the second-order reputation in the networked N-player trust game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p2:s0960077923009438
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923009438
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Wen-Jing & Chen, Zhi & Jin, Ke-Zhong & Wang, Jun & Yuan, Lin & Gu, Changgui & Jiang, Luo-Luo & Perc, Matjaž, 2022. "Options for mobility and network reciprocity to jointly yield robust cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    2. Mao, Yajun & Rong, Zhihai & Wu, Zhi-Xi, 2021. "Effect of collective influence on the evolution of cooperation in evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    3. Deng, Yunsheng & Zhang, Jihui, 2021. "Memory-based prisoner's dilemma game with history optimal strategy learning promotes cooperation on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    4. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    5. Corina E. Tarnita, 2015. "Fairness and Trust in Structured Populations," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Karthik Panchanathan & Robert Boyd, 2004. "Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7016), pages 499-502, November.
    7. Sun, Qingyi & Wang, Zhishuang & Zhao, Dawei & Xia, Chengyi & Perc, Matjaž, 2022. "Diffusion of resources and their impact on epidemic spreading in multilayer networks with simplicial complexes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Zhen Wang & Marko Jusup & Lei Shi & Joung-Hun Lee & Yoh Iwasa & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Manapat, Michael L. & Nowak, Martin A. & Rand, David G., 2013. "Information, irrationality, and the evolution of trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 57-75.
    10. Christian Hilbe & Laura Schmid & Josef Tkadlec & Krishnendu Chatterjee & Martin A. Nowak, 2018. "Indirect reciprocity with private, noisy, and incomplete information," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(48), pages 12241-12246, November.
    11. Guo, Shiqiang & Wang, Juan & Zhao, Dawei & Xia, Chengyi, 2023. "Role of second-order reputation evaluation in the multi-player snowdrift game on scale-free simplicial complexes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    13. Martin A. Nowak & Akira Sasaki & Christine Taylor & Drew Fudenberg, 2004. "Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 646-650, April.
    14. Zhu, Yuying & Xia, Chengyi, 2023. "Asynchronous best-response dynamics of networked anti-coordination game with payoff incentives," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Hernández Serrano, Daniel & Hernández-Serrano, Juan & Sánchez Gómez, Darío, 2020. "Simplicial degree in complex networks. Applications of topological data analysis to network science," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Berg Joyce & Dickhaut John & McCabe Kevin, 1995. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 122-142, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Chen, Wei & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu, 2021. "Inter-group selection of strategy promotes cooperation in public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    2. Zhang, Lan & Pan, Jianchen & Huang, Changwei, 2023. "Effect of mixed random and directional migration on cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Dimitris Iliopoulos & Arend Hintze & Christoph Adami, 2010. "Critical Dynamics in the Evolution of Stochastic Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Lv, Ran & Qian, Jia-Li & Hao, Qing-Yi & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2023. "The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    5. Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Zhipeng & Liu, Yanli & Chen, Guici, 2023. "A reinforcement learning-based strategy updating model for the cooperative evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    6. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    7. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    8. Paul Rauwolf & Joanna J. Bryson, 2018. "Expectations of Fairness and Trust Co-Evolve in Environments of Partial Information," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 891-917, December.
    9. Mohammad Salahshour, 2021. "Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Sarkar, Bijan, 2021. "The cooperation–defection evolution on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    11. Li, Bin-Quan & Wu, Zhi-Xi & Guan, Jian-Yue, 2022. "Critical thresholds of benefit distribution in an extended snowdrift game model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Su, Lichen & Yang, Zhengzhi & Zhou, Bowen & Zhang, Naitian & Li, Yumeng, 2023. "Effects of interdependent network reciprocity on the evolution of public cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    13. Wang, Lu & Ye, Shun-Qiang & Cheong, Kang Hao & Bao, Wei & Xie, Neng-gang, 2018. "The role of emotions in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with voluntary participation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1396-1407.
    14. Qi Su & Lei Zhou & Long Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Corina E. Tarnita, 2015. "Fairness and Trust in Structured Populations," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Flávio L Pinheiro & Jorge M Pacheco & Francisco C Santos, 2012. "From Local to Global Dilemmas in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    17. Kroumi, Dhaker & Lessard, Sabin, 2015. "Evolution of cooperation in a multidimensional phenotype space," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 60-75.
    18. Matthijs van Veelen & Benjamin Allen & Moshe Hoffman & Burton Simon & Carl Veller, 2016. "Inclusive Fitness," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-055/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Gao, Liyan & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Changeable updating rule promotes cooperation in well-mixed and structured populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    20. Dario Madeo & Chiara Mocenni, 2018. "Self-regulation promotes cooperation in social networks," Papers 1807.07848, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p2:s0960077923009438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.