IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v126y2019icp158-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harvesting in a toxicated intraguild predator–prey fishery model with variable carrying capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Ang, Tau Keong
  • Safuan, Hamizah M.

Abstract

Latterly, variable carrying capacity in the predator–prey population models has been widely studied to provide more realistic understanding about population dynamics. In the present paper, we discuss the bio-economic harvesting of an intraguild fishery model where the logistic carrying capacities of both predator and prey fish populations are variable based on the shared biotic resource. Distinct from most fishery models, we incorporate the independent harvesting strategies on the fisheries with different harvesting efforts by assuming them to have different economic values. In our model, the prey fish population is assumed to be infected directly by an anthropogenic toxicant from the environment while the predator is infected indirectly when they feed on prey. We investigate the local stability of trivial equilibria with Routh–Hurwitz criterion and the global stability of non-trivial equilibrium by constructing a Lyapunov function. Bifurcation and numerical analyses are presented to show distinctive result that a Hopf bifurcation occurs with respect to harvesting parameter instead of resource enrichment parameter as in the literature. Bionomic equilibrium is explored with several possibilities and restrictions. The nontrivial bionomic equilibrium is found to depend critically on the resource density. Finally, the optimal harvesting policy of the three dimensional model is derived by utilizing Pontryagin Maximum Principle. From this study, harvesting parameter is a crucial factor for the stability of the intraguild system. The objective is to obtain the optimal sustainable yield that provides maximum monetary profit while conserving the marine ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Ang, Tau Keong & Safuan, Hamizah M., 2019. "Harvesting in a toxicated intraguild predator–prey fishery model with variable carrying capacity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 158-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:158-168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077919302103
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy, Banani & Roy, Sankar Kumar & Gurung, Dil Bahadur, 2017. "Holling–Tanner model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response and time delay introducing harvesting," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Hoekstra, Jeljer & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2005. "Harvesting and conservation in a predator-prey system," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 1097-1120, June.
    3. Capone, F. & Carfora, M.F. & De Luca, R. & Torcicollo, I., 2018. "On the dynamics of an intraguild predator–prey model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 17-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D.L. DeAngelis & Bo Zhang & Wei-Ming Ni & Yuanshi Wang, 2020. "Carrying Capacity of a Population Diffusing in a Heterogeneous Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Bhunia, Bidhan & Ghorai, Santu & Kar, Tapan Kumar & Biswas, Samir & Bhutia, Lakpa Thendup & Debnath, Papiya, 2023. "A study of a spatiotemporal delayed predator–prey model with prey harvesting: Constant and periodic diffusion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Gerardo Marletto, 2012. "To drive or not to drive? A simple evolutionary model," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(2), pages 31-47.
    2. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2007. "Harvesting in an integrated general equilibrium model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 233-252, May.
    3. Melstrom, Richard T. & Horan, Richard D., 2012. "Managing Excessive Predation in a Predator-Prey Setting: The Case of Piping Plovers," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123350, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Quérou, N. & Tomini, A., 2013. "Managing interacting species in unassessed fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 192-201.
    5. N. Quérou & A. Tomini, 2018. "Marine Ecosystem Considerations and Second-Best Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 381-401, June.
    6. Lineta Ramoniene & Dovydas Brazys, 2007. "Euro Introduction Effects on Individuals’ Economic Decisions: Testing the Presence of Difference Assessment Account among Lithuanian and Latvian Consumers," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 29-55, January.
    7. Edwards, Eric C. & Go, Dong-Hun & Oladi, Reza, 2020. "Predator–prey dynamics in general equilibrium and the role of trade," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Jeroen Bergh, 2007. "Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 521-549, October.
    9. Maria Francesca Carfora & Isabella Torcicollo, 2020. "Cross-Diffusion-Driven Instability in a Predator-Prey System with Fear and Group Defense," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Lee, Min-Yang A., 2008. "Whale-watching and Herring Fishing: Joint or Independent Production?," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6086, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Birgit Bednar-Friedl & Doris Behrens & Michael Getzner, 2012. "Optimal Dynamic Control of Visitors and Endangered Species in a National Park," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 52(1), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Al-Nassir, Sadiq, 2021. "Dynamic analysis of a harvested fractional-order biological system with its discretization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Capone, F. & Carfora, M.F. & De Luca, R. & Torcicollo, I., 2019. "Turing patterns in a reaction–diffusion system modeling hunting cooperation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 172-180.
    14. Sims, Charles & Aadland, David & Finnoff, David, 2010. "A dynamic bioeconomic analysis of mountain pine beetle epidemics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2407-2419, December.
    15. Kasperski, Stephen, 2016. "Optimal multispecies harvesting in the presence of a nuisance species," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 55-63.
    16. Otwin Becker & Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger, 2020. "Optimal dynamic control of predator–prey models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 425-440, June.
    17. Yukichika Kawata, 2007. "An Economic Analysis of the Influence of Different Attitudes Toward Game Animals: Emphasizing the Significance of Large Carnivores," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 57-78, January.
    18. Barman, Binandita & Ghosh, Bapan, 2019. "Explicit impacts of harvesting in delayed predator-prey models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 213-228.
    19. Melstrom, Richard T. & Horan, Richard D., 2013. "Managing excessive predation in a predator-endangered prey setting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 85-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:158-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.