IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v86y2009i9p1767-1773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial emergy evaluation for hydrogen production systems from biomass and natural gas

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Xiao
  • Wang, Li
  • Min, Shuling

Abstract

Fossil fuel resources are the main source for hydrogen production, and hydrogen production by renewable energy, such as biomass, is under development. To compare the performance in natural resource utilization for different hydrogen production systems, in this paper, two laboratorial hydrogen production systems from biomass and one industrial hydrogen production system from natural gas are analyzed by using industrial emergy evaluation indices. One of the laboratorial systems is a continuous supercritical water gasification system from glucose, and the other is a batch supercritical water gasification system from sawdust. The industrial system adopts American Brown technology. The evaluation results show that although the industrial emergy efficiency (IEE) of the industrial system from natural gas is higher than that of the laboratorial systems from biomass, the industrial emergy index of sustainability (IEIS) of the two laboratorial systems are higher than that of the industrial system. To make the laboratorial biomass system become an industrial system, the system should improve its yield, and reduce its capital investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Xiao & Wang, Li & Min, Shuling, 2009. "Industrial emergy evaluation for hydrogen production systems from biomass and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1767-1773, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:9:p:1767-1773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(08)00334-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Ettihir, K. & Boulon, L. & Agbossou, K., 2016. "Optimization-based energy management strategy for a fuel cell/battery hybrid power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 142-153.
    3. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2017. "Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 101-108.
    4. Peralta-Ruiz, Y. & González-Delgado, A.-D. & Kafarov, V., 2013. "Evaluation of alternatives for microalgae oil extraction based on exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 226-236.
    5. Mercati, Stefano & Milani, Massimo & Montorsi, Luca & Paltrinieri, Fabrizio, 2012. "Design of the steam generator in an energy conversion system based on the aluminum combustion with water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 686-694.
    6. Li, Hongqiang & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang & Cai, Ruixian, 2010. "Analysis of a feasible polygeneration system for power and methanol production taking natural gas and biomass as materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(9), pages 2846-2853, September.
    7. Galanti, Leandro & Franzoni, Alessandro & Traverso, Alberto & Massardo, Aristide F., 2011. "Existing large steam power plant upgraded for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1510-1518, May.
    8. Arab Aboosadi, Z. & Jahanmiri, A.H. & Rahimpour, M.R., 2011. "Optimization of tri-reformer reactor to produce synthesis gas for methanol production using differential evolution (DE) method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2691-2701, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:9:p:1767-1773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.