IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v85y2008i12p1141-1162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat, gas recuperation, and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator

Author

Listed:
  • Bassily, A.M.

Abstract

The main methods for improving the efficiency or power of the combined cycle are: increasing the inlet temperature of the gas turbine (TIT), inlet air-cooling, applying gas reheat, steam or water injection into the gas turbine (GT), and reducing the irreversibility of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). In this paper, gas reheat with recuperation was applied to the regular triple-pressure steam-reheat combined cycle (the Regular cycle) by replacing the GT unit with a recuperated gas-reheat GT unit (requires two gas turbines, gas recuperator, and two combustion chambers). The Regular cycle with gas-reheat and gas-recuperation (the Regular Gas Reheat cycle) was modeled including detailed modeling of the combustion and GT cooling processes and a feasible technique to reduce the irreversibility of its HRSG was introduced. The Regular Gas Reheat cycle and the Regular Gas Reheat cycle with reduced-irreversibility HRSG (the Reduced Irreversibility cycle) were compared with the Regular cycle, which is the typical design for a commercial combined cycle. The effects of varying the TIT on the performances of all cycles were presented and discussed. The results indicate that the Reduced Irreversibility cycle is 1.9-2.15 percentage points higher in efficiency and 3.5% higher in the total specific work than the Regular Gas Reheat cycle, which is 3.3-3.6 percentage points higher in efficiency and 22-26% higher in the total specific work than the Regular cycle. The Regular Gas Reheat and Reduced Irreversibility cycles are 1.18 and 3.16 percentage points; respectively, higher in efficiency than the most efficient commercially-available combined cycle at the same value of TIT. Economic analysis was performed and showed that applying gas reheat with recuperation to the Regular cycle could result in an annual saving of 10.2 to 11.2 million US dollars for a 339Â MW to 348Â MW generating unit using the Regular cycle and that reducing the irreversibility of the HRSG of the Regular Gas Reheat cycle could result in an additional annual saving of 11.8 million US dollars for a 439Â MW generating unit using the Regular Gas Reheat cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Bassily, A.M., 2008. "Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat, gas recuperation, and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(12), pages 1141-1162, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:85:y:2008:i:12:p:1141-1162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(08)00055-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bassily, A.M., 2007. "Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 778-794.
    2. Franco, Alessandro & Casarosa, Claudio, 2004. "Thermoeconomic evaluation of the feasibility of highly efficient combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1963-1982.
    3. Bassily, A.M., 2005. "Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a dual-pressure reheat combined-cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 127-151, June.
    4. Bassily, A. M., 2004. "Performance improvements of the intercooled reheat recuperated gas-turbine cycle using absorption inlet-cooling and evaporative after-cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 249-272, March.
    5. Casarosa, C. & Donatini, F. & Franco, A., 2004. "Thermoeconomic optimization of heat recovery steam generators operating parameters for combined plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 389-414.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Gómez-Camazón, David & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Blanes-Peiró, Jorge-Juan, 2018. "Technological improvements in energetic efficiency and sustainability in existing combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 30-51.
    2. Yılmaz, Kadir & Kayfeci, Muhammet & Keçebaş, Ali, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of a waste gas-fired steam power plant in an iron and steel facility using enhanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 684-695.
    3. Ibrahim, Thamir k. & Mohammed, Mohammed Kamil & Awad, Omar I. & Rahman, M.M. & Najafi, G. & Basrawi, Firdaus & Abd Alla, Ahmed N. & Mamat, Rizalman, 2017. "The optimum performance of the combined cycle power plant: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 459-474.
    4. Rovira, Antonio & Barbero, Rubén & Montes, María José & Abbas, Rubén & Varela, Fernando, 2016. "Analysis and comparison of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles using parabolic troughs and linear Fresnel reflectors as concentrating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 990-1000.
    5. Bracco, Stefano & Siri, Silvia, 2010. "Exergetic optimization of single level combined gas–steam power plants considering different objective functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5365-5373.
    6. Marcin Jamróz & Marian Piwowarski & Paweł Ziemiański & Gabriel Pawlak, 2021. "Technical and Economic Analysis of the Supercritical Combined Gas-Steam Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Xu, Gang & Xu, Cheng & Yang, Yongping & Fang, Yaxiong & Zhou, Luyao & Zhang, Kai, 2014. "Novel partial-subsidence tower-type boiler design in an ultra-supercritical power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 363-373.
    8. Dias Raybekovich Umyshev & Eduard Vladislavovich Osipov & Andrey Anatolievich Kibarin & Maxim Sergeyevich Korobkov & Tatyana Viktorovna Khodanova & Zhansaya Serikkyzy Duisenbek, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of the Modernization Options of a Gas Turbine Power Plant Using Aspen HYSYS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Espatolero, Sergio & Cortés, Cristóbal & Romeo, Luis M., 2010. "Optimization of boiler cold-end and integration with the steam cycle in supercritical units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1651-1660, May.
    10. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Han, Yixiao & Liang, Ying, 2018. "Study on the configuration of bottom cycle in natural gas combined cycle power plants integrated with oxy-fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 465-477.
    11. Naserabad, S. Nikbakht & Mehrpanahi, A. & Ahmadi, G., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of HRSG configurations on the steam power plant repowering specifications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 277-293.
    12. Ahmadi, Gholamreza & Toghraie, Davood & Akbari, Omid Ali, 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of repowering the existing CHP system in a petrochemical plant: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 937-949.
    13. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Molaie, Hanieh, 2015. "Advanced exergy and environmental analyses and multi objective optimization of a real combined cycle power plant with supplementary firing using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2267-2279.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bassily, A.M., 2007. "Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 778-794.
    2. Srinivas, T., 2009. "Study of a deaerator location in triple-pressure reheat combined power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1364-1371.
    3. Nadir, Mahmoud & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2015. "Thermodynamic optimization of several (heat recovery steam generator) HRSG configurations for a range of exhaust gas temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 685-695.
    4. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Gómez-Camazón, David & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Blanes-Peiró, Jorge-Juan, 2018. "Technological improvements in energetic efficiency and sustainability in existing combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 30-51.
    5. Bracco, Stefano & Siri, Silvia, 2010. "Exergetic optimization of single level combined gas–steam power plants considering different objective functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5365-5373.
    6. Katulić, Stjepko & Čehil, Mislav & Schneider, Daniel Rolph, 2018. "Thermodynamic efficiency improvement of combined cycle power plant's bottom cycle based on organic working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 36-50.
    7. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Han, Yixiao & Liang, Ying, 2018. "Study on the configuration of bottom cycle in natural gas combined cycle power plants integrated with oxy-fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 465-477.
    8. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Mehrgoo, Morteza & Amidpour, Majid, 2017. "Constructal design and optimization of a dual pressure heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 87-99.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz, 2010. "The influence of economic parameters on the optimal values of the design variables of a combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 911-919.
    11. Rovira, Antonio & Barbero, Rubén & Montes, María José & Abbas, Rubén & Varela, Fernando, 2016. "Analysis and comparison of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles using parabolic troughs and linear Fresnel reflectors as concentrating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 990-1000.
    12. Yanfeng Li & Jingru Liu & Guohe Huang, 2022. "Pressure Drop Optimization of the Main Steam and Reheat Steam System of a 1000 MW Secondary Reheat Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Matjanov, Erkinjon, 2020. "Gas turbine efficiency enhancement using absorption chiller. Case study for Tashkent CHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Bassily, A.M., 2005. "Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a dual-pressure reheat combined-cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 127-151, June.
    15. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2017. "Conceptual and basic design of a novel integrated cogeneration power plant energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 516-533.
    16. Alobaid, Falah & Karner, Karl & Belz, Jörg & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2014. "Numerical and experimental study of a heat recovery steam generator during start-up procedure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1057-1070.
    17. Mohapatra, Alok Ku & Sanjay,, 2014. "Thermodynamic assessment of impact of inlet air cooling techniques on gas turbine and combined cycle performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 191-203.
    18. Naserabad, S. Nikbakht & Mehrpanahi, A. & Ahmadi, G., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of HRSG configurations on the steam power plant repowering specifications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 277-293.
    19. Khalili, Sufia & Jafarian Dehkordi, Ali & Giahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2015. "Investigating the effect of channel angle of a subsonic MHD (Magneto-Hydro-Dynamic) generator on optimum efficiency of a triple combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 543-555.
    20. Mahdi Deymi-Dashtebayaz & Parisa Kazemiani-Najafabad, 2019. "Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental analysis for various inlet air cooling methods on Shahid Hashemi-Nezhad gas turbines refinery," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(3), pages 481-498, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:85:y:2008:i:12:p:1141-1162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.