IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v316y2022ics0306261922004652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal planning of local biomass-based integrated energy system considering anaerobic co-digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Hanyu
  • Dou, Xun
  • Pan, Feng
  • Wu, Qiuwei
  • Li, Canbing
  • Zhou, Bin
  • Hao, Lili

Abstract

The biomass resource is very abundant in rural areas because of diverse agricultural activities, which enables the biogas to substitute the natural gas for the energy supply in where the natural gas network cannot extend. Thanks to the flexibility of biogas whose physical characteristic is similar to natural gas, it can not only power the biogas-based generators in the power distribution system but also meet the local biogas demand through a local biogas grid, finally formulating a distributed local biomass-based integrated energy system (IES). In such a system, proper anaerobic digestion (AD) plants planning is of great importance as the cost of transporting biomass feedstock is costly due to its high weight per unit of energy generated. Conventional AD plants planning is usually formulated as optimization problems of biomass supply chain whose focus is the planning of the transportation routes from biomass supply node to the AD plants, neglecting the downstream of the supply chain from the AD plants to the end-users. In this paper, a novel comprehensive optimization model formulated as a mixed-integer second-order-cone problem (MISOCP) is proposed to minimize the total investment and energy supply costs of the local biomass-based IES and to determine the networks of local biogas grid, to plan facilities, e.g., biogas-based generators and AD plants, and to optimize biomass transportation routes. with consideration of the network physical characteristics. Additionally, considering the anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) technology has better performance on biogas yield compared to anaerobic mono-digestion (AmoD), a strategy is developed to choose mono-digestion or co-digestion system for AD plants as well. This model is demonstrated with a real-world test system, and an environmental and economic assessment for evaluating the profitability of each AD plant is presented. The planning results showed that AcoD plant is most cost-competitive when the food waste and animal manure are locally-sufficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Hanyu & Dou, Xun & Pan, Feng & Wu, Qiuwei & Li, Canbing & Zhou, Bin & Hao, Lili, 2022. "Optimal planning of local biomass-based integrated energy system considering anaerobic co-digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:316:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922004652
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922004652
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Ida Græsted & Münster, Marie & Pisinger, David, 2017. "Optimizing the supply chain of biomass and biogas for a single plant considering mass and energy losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 744-758.
    2. Chen, Qiu & Liu, Tianbiao, 2017. "Biogas system in rural China: Upgrading from decentralized to centralized?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 933-944.
    3. Valenti, Francesca & Porto, Simona M.C. & Dale, Bruce E. & Liao, Wei, 2018. "Spatial analysis of feedstock supply and logistics to establish regional biogas power generation: A case study in the region of Sicily," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 50-63.
    4. Conrado Borraz-Sánchez & Russell Bent & Scott Backhaus & Hassan Hijazi & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2016. "Convex Relaxations for Gas Expansion Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 645-656, November.
    5. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh & Griess, Verena C., 2018. "Integrated strategic and tactical optimization of forest-based biomass supply chains to consider medium-term supply and demand variations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 626-638.
    6. Picardo, Alberto & Soltero, Victor M. & Peralta, M. Estela & Chacartegui, Ricardo, 2019. "District heating based on biogas from wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 649-664.
    7. Bramstoft, Rasmus & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Jensen, Ida Græsted & Ravn, Hans & Münster, Marie, 2020. "Modelling of renewable gas and renewable liquid fuels in future integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. O'Shea, Richard & Wall, David M. & Kilgallon, Ian & Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2017. "Assessing the total theoretical, and financially viable, resource of biomethane for injection to a natural gas network in a region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 237-256.
    9. Soltero, V.M. & Chacartegui, R. & Ortiz, C. & Velázquez, R., 2018. "Potential of biomass district heating systems in rural areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 132-143.
    10. Samsatli, Sheila & Samsatli, Nouri J. & Shah, Nilay, 2015. "BVCM: A comprehensive and flexible toolkit for whole system biomass value chain analysis and optimisation – Mathematical formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 131-160.
    11. Zhang, Fengli & Johnson, Dana & Johnson, Mark & Watkins, David & Froese, Robert & Wang, Jinjiang, 2016. "Decision support system integrating GIS with simulation and optimisation for a biofuel supply chain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 740-748.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Pengya & Wang, Jianxiao & Jin, Ruiyang & Li, Gengyin & Zhou, Ming & Xia, Qing, 2022. "Integrating biogas in regional energy systems to achieve near-zero carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    2. Ju, Liwei & Lu, Xiaolong & Yang, Shenbo & Li, Gen & Fan, Wei & Pan, Yushu & Qiao, Huiting, 2022. "A multi-time scale dispatching optimal model for rural biomass waste energy conversion system-based micro-energy grid considering multi-energy demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    3. Ronei de Almeida & Claudinei de Souza Guimarães, 2023. "A Short Review on Dye-Wastewater Valorization Using Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactors," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Farajiamiri, Mina & Meyer, Jörn-Christian & Walther, Grit, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of renewable fuel supply chains regarding cost, land use, and water use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    3. Díaz-Trujillo, Luis Alberto & Nápoles-Rivera, Fabricio, 2019. "Optimization of biogas supply chain in Mexico considering economic and environmental aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1227-1240.
    4. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    5. Martinez-Valencia, Lina & Garcia-Perez, Manuel & Wolcott, Michael P., 2021. "Supply chain configuration of sustainable aviation fuel: Review, challenges, and pathways for including environmental and social benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Soltero, V.M. & Quirosa, Gonzalo & Peralta, M.E. & Chacartegui, Ricardo & Torres, Miguel, 2022. "A biomass universal district heating model for sustainability evaluation for geographical areas with early experience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Venn, Tyron J. & Dorries, Jack W. & McGavin, Robert L., 2021. "A mathematical model to support investment in veneer and LVL manufacturing in subtropical eastern Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Xinxin Liu & Nan Li & Feng Liu & Hailin Mu & Longxi Li & Xiaoyu Liu, 2021. "Optimal Design on Fossil-to-Renewable Energy Transition of Regional Integrated Energy Systems under CO 2 Emission Abatement Control: A Case Study in Dalian, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Persson, Urban & Wiechers, Eva & Möller, Bernd & Werner, Sven, 2019. "Heat Roadmap Europe: Heat distribution costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 604-622.
    12. Zhao, Xiqiang & Zhou, Xing & Wang, Guoxiu & Zhou, Ping & Wang, Wenlong & Song, Zhanlong, 2022. "Evaluating the effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis of biomass and the biochar catalytic performance on dry reforming of methane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 313-325.
    13. Ives, Matthew & Cesaro, Zac & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Bañares-Alcántara, René, 2023. "Facilitating deep decarbonization via sector coupling of green hydrogen and ammonia," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    14. Luo, Li & O'Hehir, Jim & Regan, Courtney M. & Meng, Li & Connor, Jeffery D. & Chow, Christopher W.K., 2021. "An integrated strategic and tactical optimization model for forest supply chain planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. De Boeck, Kim & Decouttere, Catherine & Jónasson, Jónas Oddur & Vandaele, Nico, 2022. "Vaccine supply chains in resource-limited settings: Mitigating the impact of rainy season disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 300-317.
    16. Anna Duczkowska & Ewa Kulińska & Zbigniew Plutecki & Joanna Rut, 2022. "Sustainable Agro-Biomass Market for Urban Heating Using Centralized District Heating System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Wang, Jun & Xue, Qingwen & Guo, Ting & Mei, Zili & Long, Enshen & Wen, Qian & Huang, Wei & Luo, Tao & Huang, Ruyi, 2018. "A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 64-73.
    18. Fambri, Gabriele & Diaz-Londono, Cesar & Mazza, Andrea & Badami, Marco & Sihvonen, Teemu & Weiss, Robert, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Power-to-Gas plants in a gas and electricity distribution network system with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    19. Mengying Xue & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Optimizing natural gas pipeline transmission with nonuniform elevation: A new initialization approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 547-564, October.
    20. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:316:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922004652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.