IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v280y2020ics0306261920314008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic cost–benefit analysis framework for allocating energy storage system in distribution network for load leveling

Author

Listed:
  • Trivedi, Anupam
  • Chong Aih, Hau
  • Srinivasan, Dipti

Abstract

Increasing peak demand, retirement of conventional generation capacity, and high cost of constructing new generation capacity and network reinforcements are the challenges faced by utilities in urban cities. To address the above challenges, this paper proposes a stochastic cost–benefit analysis (CBA) framework, named CBA-LL, for allocating centralized energy storage system (ESS) in distribution network for load leveling. CBA-LL is built on a scenario-based stochastic optimization approach that integrates principal component analysis and k-means clustering for effective probabilistic load modeling. In CBA-LL, a genetic algorithm (GA) based optimization approach is utilized over a multi-year planning horizon for ESS sizing. Within the GA, the optimal operation of ESS for load leveling is determined using fmincon solver of MATLAB with the objective of minimizing load variance. The benefits of integrating ESS in terms of distribution system upgrade cost, distribution energy loss cost, arbitrage benefit, and generation plant upgrade cost are considered. In CBA for ESS allocation, the financial objective chosen is generally maximizing net savings (NS) (also known as net present value (NPV)). However, the limitation of NS objective function is that it does not consider the scale of investment required to achieve the objective. ROI and NS are two important and complimentary criteria in investment decision making. However, to the best of our knowledge, ROI has never been investigated in the literature as a planning objective function for sizing ESS. Hence, in this paper, we investigate maximizing ROI as a planning objective function and compare it with maximizing NS objective function. The proposed CBA-LL approach is implemented on a 33-bus distribution system, and two types of ESS technologies, namely, Li-ion and Vanadium Redox Flow (VRF) are compared. The simulation results demonstrate the complementary nature of NS and ROI objective functions. Furthermore, the simulation results highlight that ROI objective function may be more preferable when there is a lack of investment budget or high opportunity cost of investment. Our analysis suggests that the decision makers (DM) can investigate both NS and ROI objective functions for ESS sizing and then select a solution based on a more informed decision. The comparison of battery technologies demonstrate that the Li-ion battery is significantly superior to the VRF battery for the load leveling application.

Suggested Citation

  • Trivedi, Anupam & Chong Aih, Hau & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2020. "A stochastic cost–benefit analysis framework for allocating energy storage system in distribution network for load leveling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920314008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920314008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2018. "Singapore and Hong Kong: small, similar but different," Chapters, in: The New Global Politics of Science, chapter 4, pages 65-83, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ren, Hongbo & Wu, Qiong & Zhu, Qunzhi & Gao, Weijun, 2019. "Cost–benefit analysis of distributed energy systems considering multi-benefits and multi-stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Guney, Mukrimin Sevket & Tepe, Yalcin, 2017. "Classification and assessment of energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1187-1197.
    4. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Habibi, Daryoush, 2018. "Optimal placement of distributed energy storage systems in distribution networks using artificial bee colony algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 212-228.
    5. Jannesar, Mohammad Rasol & Sedighi, Alireza & Savaghebi, Mehdi & Guerrero, Josep M., 2018. "Optimal placement, sizing, and daily charge/discharge of battery energy storage in low voltage distribution network with high photovoltaic penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 957-966.
    6. Sardi, Junainah & Mithulananthan, N. & Gallagher, M. & Hung, Duong Quoc, 2017. "Multiple community energy storage planning in distribution networks using a cost-benefit analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 453-463.
    7. Bucciarelli, Martina & Paoletti, Simone & Vicino, Antonio, 2018. "Optimal sizing of energy storage systems under uncertain demand and generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 611-621.
    8. Mehrjerdi, Hasan, 2019. "Simultaneous load leveling and voltage profile improvement in distribution networks by optimal battery storage planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 916-926.
    9. Hartmann, Bálint & Divényi, Dániel & Vokony, István, 2018. "Evaluation of business possibilities of energy storage at commercial and industrial consumers – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 59-66.
    10. Sidhu, Arjan S. & Pollitt, Michael G. & Anaya, Karim L., 2018. "A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 881-894.
    11. Li, Jie & Jo Min, K. & Otake, Toshitsugu & Van Voorhis, Timothy, 2008. "Inventory and investment in setup and quality operations under Return On Investment maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 593-605, March.
    12. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.
    13. Stephen Comello & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "The emergence of cost effective battery storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Xia, Shiwei & Chan, K.W. & Luo, Xiao & Bu, Siqi & Ding, Zhaohao & Zhou, Bin, 2018. "Optimal sizing of energy storage system and its cost-benefit analysis for power grid planning with intermittent wind generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 472-486.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Mingtao & Huang, Huijun & Song, Xiaoling & Peña-Mora, Feniosky & Zhang, Zhe & Chen, Jie, 2022. "Optimal sizing and operations of shared energy storage systems in distribution networks: A bi-level programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Lu, Xi & Xia, Shiwei & Gu, Wei & Chan, Ka Wing, 2022. "A model for balance responsible distribution systems with energy storage to achieve coordinated load shifting and uncertainty mitigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Marcelino, C.G. & Leite, G.M.C. & Wanner, E.F. & Jiménez-Fernández, S. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2023. "Evaluating the use of a Net-Metering mechanism in microgrids to reduce power generation costs with a swarm-intelligent algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Sungki Kim & Jin-Seop Kim & Dong-Keun Cho, 2021. "Benefit and Cost Ratio Analysis of Direct Disposal and Pyro-SFR Fuel Cycle Alternatives Using the Results of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Cabrales, Sergio & Valencia, Carlos & Ramírez, Carlos & Ramírez, Andrés & Herrera, Juan & Cadena, Angela, 2022. "Stochastic cost-benefit analysis to assess new infrastructure to improve the reliability of the natural gas supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannan, M.A. & Faisal, M. & Jern Ker, Pin & Begum, R.A. & Dong, Z.Y. & Zhang, C., 2020. "Review of optimal methods and algorithms for sizing energy storage systems to achieve decarbonization in microgrid applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Ghaffari, Abolfazl & Askarzadeh, Alireza & Fadaeinedjad, Roohollah, 2022. "Optimal allocation of energy storage systems, wind turbines and photovoltaic systems in distribution network considering flicker mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    3. Gu, Chenjia & Wang, Jianxue & Zhang, Yao & Li, Qingtao & Chen, Yang, 2022. "Optimal energy storage planning for stacked benefits in power distribution network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 366-380.
    4. Panda, Deepak Kumar & Das, Saptarshi, 2021. "Economic operational analytics for energy storage placement at different grid locations and contingency scenarios with stochastic wind profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mousavi, Navid & Habibi, Daryoush & Masoum, Mohammad A.S., 2019. "Optimal allocation of distributed energy storage systems to improve performance and power quality of distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Optimal energy management in all-electric residential energy systems with heat and electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Hui Wang & Jun Wang & Zailin Piao & Xiaofang Meng & Chao Sun & Gang Yuan & Sitong Zhu, 2020. "The Optimal Allocation and Operation of an Energy Storage System with High Penetration Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Bozorgavari, Seyed Aboozar & Aghaei, Jamshid & Pirouzi, Sasan & Nikoobakht, Ahmad & Farahmand, Hossein & Korpås, Magnus, 2020. "Robust planning of distributed battery energy storage systems in flexible smart distribution networks: A comprehensive study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Mortaz, Ebrahim & Vinel, Alexander & Dvorkin, Yury, 2019. "An optimization model for siting and sizing of vehicle-to-grid facilities in a microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1649-1660.
    10. Adefarati, T. & Bansal, R.C., 2019. "Reliability, economic and environmental analysis of a microgrid system in the presence of renewable energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1089-1114.
    11. Arcos-Vargas, Ángel & Canca, David & Núñez, Fernando, 2020. "Impact of battery technological progress on electricity arbitrage: An application to the Iberian market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Núñez, Fernando & Canca, David & Arcos-Vargas, Ángel, 2022. "An assessment of European electricity arbitrage using storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Ibrahim Alotaibi & Mohammed A. Abido & Muhammad Khalid & Andrey V. Savkin, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Smart Grids: A Sustainable Future with Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-41, November.
    14. Shi, Jing & Xu, Ying & Liao, Meng & Guo, Shuqiang & Li, Yuanyuan & Ren, Li & Su, Rongyu & Li, Shujian & Zhou, Xiao & Tang, Yuejin, 2019. "Integrated design method for superconducting magnetic energy storage considering the high frequency pulse width modulation pulse voltage on magnet," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 1-17.
    15. Nathphol Khaboot & Chitchai Srithapon & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Pirat Khunkitti, 2019. "Increasing Benefits in High PV Penetration Distribution System by Using Battery Enegy Storage and Capacitor Placement Based on Salp Swarm Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Grid-connected photovoltaic battery systems: A comprehensive review and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Lee, J. & Bérard, Jean-Philippe & Razeghi, G. & Samuelsen, S., 2020. "Maximizing PV hosting capacity of distribution feeder microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    18. Rasheed Abdulkader & Hayder M. A. Ghanimi & Pankaj Dadheech & Meshal Alharbi & Walid El-Shafai & Mostafa M. Fouda & Moustafa H. Aly & Dhivya Swaminathan & Sudhakar Sengan, 2023. "Soft Computing in Smart Grid with Decentralized Generation and Renewable Energy Storage System Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Habibi, Daryoush, 2018. "Optimal placement of distributed energy storage systems in distribution networks using artificial bee colony algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 212-228.
    20. Ioannis Mexis & Grazia Todeschini, 2020. "Battery Energy Storage Systems in the United Kingdom: A Review of Current State-of-the-Art and Future Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920314008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.