IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v213y2018icp76-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A realistic and integrated model for evaluating oil sands development with Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Rui, Zhenhua
  • Wang, Xiaoqing
  • Zhang, Zhien
  • Lu, Jun
  • Chen, Gang
  • Zhou, Xiyu
  • Patil, Shirish

Abstract

Oil sands resource is the third largest oil reserve, and 70% of the oil sands are in Canada. The emerging of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology has made the commercial development of oil sands economically feasible. However, with the recent oil price crash, the development of oil sands has faced an uphill battle. A realistic and integrated evaluation model is highly needed to overcome difficulties from the low oil price and provide meaningful and valuable information for operators as well as investors to make the right decision. The existing evaluation models have considerable limitations (i.e., the incapability of evaluating integrated oil sands development with Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology, the lack of investigation into the input parameters with historical data, and ignoring the effect of the subsurface reservoir, etc.). This study developed an integrated evaluation model through the analyses of a significant amount of actual historical data. This integrated model includes six subcomponent models, ranging from the subsurface reservoir to infield flowline. Data from 35 Canadian oil sands development with 15 internal and external parameters were collected and investigated. The oil price effect was analyzed and quantified through simulations. The breakeven Western Canada Select oil price of $39/bbl. (equal to the West Texas Intermediate oil price of $55/bbl.) and other key price points and distributions were identified. Also, the top seven geological and technical parameters that contribute 86% of the net present value variations were identified and investigated. These quantified effects of external and internal parameters are useful findings for decision making. Considering various price scenarios and uncertainties of the input parameters, this study has concluded that developing oil sands resources with the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology is economically feasible and socially beneficial after we take all stakeholder interests into consideration, which is true even with the sustainable and realistic oil price in the foreseeable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui, Zhenhua & Wang, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Zhien & Lu, Jun & Chen, Gang & Zhou, Xiyu & Patil, Shirish, 2018. "A realistic and integrated model for evaluating oil sands development with Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology in Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 76-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:213:y:2018:i:c:p:76-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918300199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacchetta, Giancarlo & Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara, 2015. "Economic and environmental analysis of a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) facility for oil recovery from Canadian oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Méjean, Aurélie & Hope, Chris, 2008. "Modelling the costs of non-conventional oil: A case study of Canadian bitumen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4205-4216, November.
    3. Hashemi, Rohallah & Nassar, Nashaat N. & Pereira Almao, Pedro, 2014. "Nanoparticle technology for heavy oil in-situ upgrading and recovery enhancement: Opportunities and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 374-387.
    4. Welkenhuysen, Kris & Rupert, Jort & Compernolle, Tine & Ramirez, Andrea & Swennen, Rudy & Piessens, Kris, 2017. "Considering economic and geological uncertainty in the simulation of realistic investment decisions for CO2-EOR projects in the North Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 745-761.
    5. Lazzaroni, Edoardo Filippo & Elsholkami, Mohamed & Arbiv, Itai & Martelli, Emanuele & Elkamel, Ali & Fowler, Michael, 2016. "Energy infrastructure modeling for the oil sands industry: Current situation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 435-445.
    6. Soderbergh, Bengt & Robelius, Fredrik & Aleklett, Kjell, 2007. "A crash programme scenario for the Canadian oil sands industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1931-1947, March.
    7. Elias Ikpe & Jatinder Kumar & George Jergeas, 2015. "Benchmarking Characteristics of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Projects: Based On Interview Findings," Business and Management Horizons, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Kraemer, Daniel & Bajpayee, Anurag & Muto, Andy & Berube, Vincent & Chiesa, Matteo, 2009. "Solar assisted method for recovery of bitumen from oil sand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1437-1441, September.
    9. Hofmann, Hannes & Babadagli, Tayfun & Zimmermann, Günter, 2014. "Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: Process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 524-547.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Hao & Cheng, Linsong & Wu, Keliu & Huang, Shijun & Maini, Brij B., 2018. "Assessment of energy efficiency and solvent retention inside steam chamber of steam- and solvent-assisted gravity drainage process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 287-299.
    2. Giacchetta, Giancarlo & Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara, 2015. "Economic and environmental analysis of a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) facility for oil recovery from Canadian oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Chi Yong & Mu Tong & Zhongyi Yang & Jixian Zhou, 2023. "Conventional Natural Gas Project Investment and Decision Making under Multiple Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Méjean, Aurélie & Hope, Chris, 2013. "Supplying synthetic crude oil from Canadian oil sands: A comparative study of the costs and CO2 emissions of mining and in-situ recovery," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-40.
    5. Ajumobi, Oluwole O. & Muraza, Oki & Kondoh, Hisaki & Hasegawa, Natsumi & Nakasaka, Yuta & Yoshikawa, Takuya & Al Amer, Adnan M. & Masuda, Takao, 2018. "Upgrading oil sand bitumen under superheated steam over ceria-based nanocomposite catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Sapkota, Krishna & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi & Kumar, Amit & Linwei, Ma, 2018. "The development of a techno-economic model for the extraction, transportation, upgrading, and shipping of Canadian oil sands products to the Asia-Pacific region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 273-292.
    7. Nimana, Balwinder & Canter, Christina & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the recovery and extraction of crude bitumen from Canada’s oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 189-199.
    8. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    9. Xia, Wenjie & Shen, Weijun & Yu, Li & Zheng, Chenggang & Yu, Weichu & Tang, Yongchun, 2016. "Conversion of petroleum to methane by the indigenous methanogenic consortia for oil recovery in heavy oil reservoir," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 646-655.
    10. Soiket, Md.I.H. & Oni, A.O. & Gemechu, E.D. & Kumar, A., 2019. "Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of upgrading and refining bitumen from the solvent extraction process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 236-250.
    11. Lazzaroni, Edoardo Filippo & Elsholkami, Mohamed & Arbiv, Itai & Martelli, Emanuele & Elkamel, Ali & Fowler, Michael, 2016. "Energy infrastructure modeling for the oil sands industry: Current situation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 435-445.
    12. Cheng, Linsong & Liu, Hao & Huang, Shijun & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Xiao & Wang, Daigang & Xiong, Hao, 2018. "Environmental and economic benefits of Solvent-Assisted Steam-Gravity Drainage for bitumen through horizontal well: A comprehensive modeling analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 418-431.
    13. Wang, Zhengxu & Gao, Deli & Diao, Binbin & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "The influence of casing properties on performance of radio frequency heating for oil sands recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Sena, Marcelo Fonseca Monteiro de & Rosa, Luiz Pinguelli & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Will Venezuelan extra-heavy oil be a significant source of petroleum in the next decades?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 51-59.
    15. Zhang, Qitao & Liu, Wenchao & Dahi Taleghani, Arash, 2022. "Numerical study on non-Newtonian Bingham fluid flow in development of heavy oil reservoirs using radiofrequency heating method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    16. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    17. Haiyang Jiang & Liangliang Guo & Fengxin Kang & Fugang Wang & Yanling Cao & Zhe Sun & Meng Shi, 2023. "Geothermal Characteristics and Productivity Potential of a Super-Thick Shallow Granite-Type Enhanced Geothermal System: A Case Study in Wendeng Geothermal Field, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    19. Méjean, Aurélie & Hope, Chris, 2008. "Modelling the costs of non-conventional oil: A case study of Canadian bitumen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4205-4216, November.
    20. Li, Jing & Zhang, Lisong & Yang, Feiyue & Sun, Luning, 2020. "Positive measure and potential implication for heavy oil recovery of dip reservoir using SAGD based on numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:213:y:2018:i:c:p:76-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.