IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v185y2017ip2p1100-1108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational assessment of the DeepWind aerodynamic performance with different blade and airfoil configurations

Author

Listed:
  • Bedon, Gabriele
  • Schmidt Paulsen, Uwe
  • Aagaard Madsen, Helge
  • Belloni, Federico
  • Raciti Castelli, Marco
  • Benini, Ernesto

Abstract

An aerodynamic improvement of the DeepWind rotor is conducted adopting different rotor geometries and solutions with respect to the original configuration while keeping the comparison as fair as possible. The objective of this work is to find the most suitable configuration in order to maximize the power production and minimize the blade stress and the cost of energy. Different parameters are considered for the study. The DeepWind blade is characterized by a shape similar to the Troposkien geometry but asymmetric between the top and bottom parts. The blade shape is considered as a fixed parameter in the optimization process and, because of different blade element radii, it will experience different tip speed ratios in the same operational condition. This leads to a complex optimization problem, which must be carefully analyzed in order to find the most suitable parameter set. The number of blades in the analysis is varied from 1 to 4. In order to keep the comparison fair among the different configurations, the solidity is kept constant and, therefore, the chord length reduced. A second comparison is conducted by considering different blade profiles belonging to the symmetric NACA airfoil family. Finally, a chord optimization along the blade span is conducted, in order to find the optimal chord distribution to maximize the power production.

Suggested Citation

  • Bedon, Gabriele & Schmidt Paulsen, Uwe & Aagaard Madsen, Helge & Belloni, Federico & Raciti Castelli, Marco & Benini, Ernesto, 2017. "Computational assessment of the DeepWind aerodynamic performance with different blade and airfoil configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1100-1108.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p2:p:1100-1108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915012659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bedon, Gabriele & Raciti Castelli, Marco & Benini, Ernesto, 2014. "Proposal for an innovative chord distribution in the Troposkien vertical axis wind turbine concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 689-698.
    2. Bedon, Gabriele & Raciti Castelli, Marco & Benini, Ernesto, 2013. "Optimization of a Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbine using blade element – momentum theory and evolutionary algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 184-192.
    3. Andrew Shires, 2013. "Development and Evaluation of an Aerodynamic Model for a Novel Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Concept," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Bedon, Gabriele & Antonini, Enrico G.A. & De Betta, Stefano & Raciti Castelli, Marco & Benini, Ernesto, 2014. "Evaluation of the different aerodynamic databases for vertical axis wind turbine simulations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 386-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Chao & Xiao, Yiqing & Xu, You-lin & Peng, Yi-xin & Hu, Gang & Zhu, Songye, 2018. "Optimization of blade pitch in H-rotor vertical axis wind turbines through computational fluid dynamics simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1107-1125.
    2. He, Yuanping & Zhang, Mingxu & Li, Weijun & Su, Junwei & Kase, Kiwamu & Yu, Chuck Wah & Gu, Zhaolin, 2019. "Feasibility of a new helical blade structure for a PV integrated wind turbine in a heat-driven swirling wind field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 585-598.
    3. Zygmunt Szczerba & Piotr Szczerba & Kamil Szczerba & Marek Szumski & Krzysztof Pytel, 2023. "Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Efficiency of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines via Analysis of Blade Pitch Angle Influence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Chen, Jian & Pan, Xiong & Wang, Canxing & Hu, Guojun & Xu, Hongtao & Liu, Pengwei, 2019. "Airfoil parameterization evaluation based on a modified PARASEC method for a H-Darrious rotor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Kalkman, Ivo & Blocken, Bert, 2017. "Effect of pitch angle on power performance and aerodynamics of a vertical axis wind turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 132-150.
    6. Hesami, Ali & Nikseresht, Amir H., 2023. "Towards development and optimization of the Savonius wind turbine incorporated with a wind-lens," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    7. Krzysztof Rogowski & Martin Otto Laver Hansen & Galih Bangga, 2020. "Performance Analysis of a H-Darrieus Wind Turbine for a Series of 4-Digit NACA Airfoils," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Peng, Yi-Xin & Xu, You-Lin & Zhan, Sheng, 2019. "A hybrid DMST model for pitch optimization and performance assessment of high-solidity straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 215-228.
    9. Tirandaz, M. Rasoul & Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim, 2021. "Effect of airfoil shape on power performance of vertical axis wind turbines in dynamic stall: Symmetric Airfoils," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 422-441.
    10. Su, Jie & Li, Yu & Chen, Yaoran & Han, Zhaolong & Zhou, Dai & Zhao, Yongsheng & Bao, Yan, 2021. "Aerodynamic performance assessment of φ-type vertical axis wind turbine under pitch motion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Xu, You-Lin & Peng, Yi-Xin & Zhan, Sheng, 2019. "Optimal blade pitch function and control device for high-solidity straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1613-1625.
    12. Su, Jie & Chen, Yaoran & Han, Zhaolong & Zhou, Dai & Bao, Yan & Zhao, Yongsheng, 2020. "Investigation of V-shaped blade for the performance improvement of vertical axis wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Barnes, Andrew & Marshall-Cross, Daniel & Hughes, Ben Richard, 2021. "Towards a standard approach for future Vertical Axis Wind Turbine aerodynamics research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Wen, Binrong & Tian, Xinliang & Dong, Xingjian & Peng, Zhike & Zhang, Wenming & Wei, Kexiang, 2019. "A numerical study on the angle of attack to the blade of a horizontal-axis offshore floating wind turbine under static and dynamic yawed conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1138-1156.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jian & Yang, Hongxing & Yang, Mo & Xu, Hongtao & Hu, Zuohuan, 2015. "A comprehensive review of the theoretical approaches for the airfoil design of lift-type vertical axis wind turbine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1709-1720.
    2. Marinić-Kragić, Ivo & Vučina, Damir & Milas, Zoran, 2018. "Numerical workflow for 3D shape optimization and synthesis of vertical-axis wind turbines for specified operating regimes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 113-127.
    3. Marinić-Kragić, Ivo & Vučina, Damir & Milas, Zoran, 2019. "Concept of flexible vertical-axis wind turbine with numerical simulation and shape optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 841-852.
    4. Jin, Xin & Zhao, Gaoyuan & Gao, KeJun & Ju, Wenbin, 2015. "Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine: Basic research methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 212-225.
    5. Jin, Xin & Wang, Yaming & Ju, Wenbin & He, Jiao & Xie, Shuangyi, 2018. "Investigation into parameter influence of upstream deflector on vertical axis wind turbines output power via three-dimensional CFD simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 41-53.
    6. Chen, Jian & Pan, Xiong & Wang, Canxing & Hu, Guojun & Xu, Hongtao & Liu, Pengwei, 2019. "Airfoil parameterization evaluation based on a modified PARASEC method for a H-Darrious rotor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Eduard Dyachuk & Anders Goude, 2015. "Simulating Dynamic Stall Effects for Vertical Axis Wind Turbines Applying a Double Multiple Streamtube Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Bedon, Gabriele & De Betta, Stefano & Benini, Ernesto, 2016. "Performance-optimized airfoil for Darrieus wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 328-340.
    9. Chen, Yaoran & Su, Jie & Han, Zhaolong & Zhao, Yongsheng & Zhou, Dai & Yang, He & Bao, Yan & Lei, Hang, 2020. "A shape optimization of ϕ-shape Darrieus wind turbine under a given range of inlet wind speed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 286-299.
    10. Wekesa, David Wafula & Wang, Cong & Wei, Yingjie & Danao, Louis Angelo M., 2017. "Analytical and numerical investigation of unsteady wind for enhanced energy capture in a fluctuating free-stream," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 854-864.
    11. Meana-Fernández, Andrés & Solís-Gallego, Irene & Fernández Oro, Jesús Manuel & Argüelles Díaz, Katia María & Velarde-Suárez, Sandra, 2018. "Parametrical evaluation of the aerodynamic performance of vertical axis wind turbines for the proposal of optimized designs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 504-517.
    12. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2015. "A New Approach for Modeling Darrieus-Type Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Rotors Using Electrical Equivalent Circuit Analogy: Basis of Theoretical Formulations and Model Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-34, September.
    13. Bedon, Gabriele & Raciti Castelli, Marco & Benini, Ernesto, 2014. "Proposal for an innovative chord distribution in the Troposkien vertical axis wind turbine concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 689-698.
    14. Bukala, Jakub & Damaziak, Krzysztof & Karimi, Hamid Reza & Kroszczynski, Krzysztof & Krzeszowiec, Marcin & Malachowski, Jerzy, 2015. "Modern small wind turbine design solutions comparison in terms of estimated cost to energy output ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1166-1173.
    15. Ruiwen Zhao & Angus C. W. Creech & Alistair G. L. Borthwick & Vengatesan Venugopal & Takafumi Nishino, 2020. "Aerodynamic Analysis of a Two-Bladed Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Using a Coupled Unsteady RANS and Actuator Line Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Delafin, P.-L. & Nishino, T. & Kolios, A. & Wang, L., 2017. "Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 564-575.
    17. Eduard Dyachuk & Anders Goude, 2015. "Numerical Validation of a Vortex Model against ExperimentalData on a Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Daniel Micallef & Gerard Van Bussel, 2018. "A Review of Urban Wind Energy Research: Aerodynamics and Other Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Daróczy, László & Janiga, Gábor & Thévenin, Dominique, 2016. "Analysis of the performance of a H-Darrieus rotor under uncertainty using Polynomial Chaos Expansion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 399-412.
    20. Chen, Jian & Yang, Hongxing & Yang, Mo & Xu, Hongtao, 2015. "The effect of the opening ratio and location on the performance of a novel vertical axis Darrieus turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 819-834.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p2:p:1100-1108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.