IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v183y2016icp1616-1632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Yuan
  • Bhattacharyya, Debangsu

Abstract

Direct coal liquefaction (DCL) technologies have been commercially demonstrated for producing transportation fuels from non-petroleum sources. However, significant amount of hydrogen is required in the DCL process due to the low H/C ratio in coal. As a result, DCL processes are usually associated with a high level CO2 emission from hydrogen production units. Hence, direct coal biomass to liquids (CBTL) processes with CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and shale gas utilization are proposed in this work as an option for reducing CO2 emission. In this study, the focus is on process simulation and calculation of material and energy balances of novel direct CBTL plants, which can be used as a basis for further studies, such as optimization, techno-economic analysis and life-cycle analysis. In this process, coal with moderate amount of biomass is converted into syncrude through reaction with H-donor solvent and gaseous hydrogen in a catalytic two-stage liquefaction unit. Hydrogen required for the liquefaction and product upgrading unit is produced from the liquefaction residue partial oxidation unit and the shale gas steam reforming unit or from the coal/biomass/residue co-gasification unit. Different CCS technologies are evaluated to achieve 90% overall carbon capture if high extent of CO2 capture is considered. Results of individual plant sections are validated with the existing data, if available. Sensitivity studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of key operating parameters and design parameters, such as the sources of hydrogen, CCS technologies, extent of CCS, and biomass/coal ratio. Key measures studied in this work include the fuel yield, thermal efficiency, CCS penalty and CO2 emission.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2016. "Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1616-1632.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:183:y:2016:i:c:p:1616-1632
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191631399X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srirangan, Kajan & Akawi, Lamees & Moo-Young, Murray & Chou, C. Perry, 2012. "Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Aime Hilaire Tchapda & Sarma V. Pisupati, 2014. "A Review of Thermal Co-Conversion of Coal and Biomass/Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-51, February.
    3. Stamford, Laurence & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 506-518.
    4. Kieffer, Matthew & Brown, Tristan & Brown, Robert C., 2016. "Flex fuel polygeneration: Integrating renewable natural gas into Fischer–Tropsch synthesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 208-218.
    5. Hengfu Shui & Zhenyi Cai & Chunbao Xu, 2010. "Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Shui, Hengfu & Shan, Chuanjun & Cai, Zhengyi & Wang, Zhicai & Lei, Zhiping & Ren, Shibiao & Pan, Chunxiu & Li, Haiping, 2011. "Co-liquefaction behavior of a sub-bituminous coal and sawdust," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6645-6650.
    7. Ken K. Robinson, 2009. "Reaction Engineering of Direct Coal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott, 2015. "Coproduction of transportation fuels in advanced IGCCs via coal and biomass mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 851-860.
    9. Schakel, Wouter & Meerman, Hans & Talaei, Alireza & Ramírez, Andrea & Faaij, André, 2014. "Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 441-467.
    10. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bassano, Claudia & Deiana, Paolo & Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2020. "Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2019. "Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 119-134.
    3. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    4. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    5. Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.
    6. Liu, Weiguo & Wang, Jingxin & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Jiang, Yuan & DeVallance, David, 2017. "Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    7. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Plant-wide modeling and analysis of the shale gas to dimethyl ether (DME) process via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 163-180.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    2. Moinuddin Ghauri & Khurram Shahzad & Abrar Inayat & Zulfiqar Ali & Keith R. Cliffe, 2016. "High Pressure Oxydesulphurisation of Coal Using KMnO 4 —Effect of Coal Slurry Concentration, pH and Alkali," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Moinuddin Ghauri & Abrar Inayat & Muhammad Tariq Bashir & Salmiaton B. Ali & Keith R. Cliffe, 2013. "High Pressure Oxydesulphurisation of Coal—A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Ail, Snehesh Shivananda & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis – Technology review and current scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 267-286.
    5. Bhave, Amit & Taylor, Richard H.S. & Fennell, Paul & Livingston, William R. & Shah, Nilay & Dowell, Niall Mac & Dennis, John & Kraft, Markus & Pourkashanian, Mohammed & Insa, Mathieu & Jones, Jenny & , 2017. "Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 481-489.
    6. Moinuddin Ghauri & Khurram Shahzad & Abrar Inayat & Zulfiqar Ali & Waqar Ali Khan & Javaid Akhtar & Keith R. Cliffe, 2016. "High Pressure Oxydesulphurisation of Coal—Effect of Oxidizing Agent, Solvent, Shear and Agitator Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Yang, Ziqi & Wu, Yuanqing & Zhang, Zisheng & Li, Hong & Li, Xingang & Egorov, Roman I. & Strizhak, Pavel A. & Gao, Xin, 2019. "Recent advances in co-thermochemical conversions of biomass with fossil fuels focusing on the synergistic effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 384-398.
    8. Bassani, Andrea & Pirola, Carlo & Maggio, Enrico & Pettinau, Alberto & Frau, Caterina & Bozzano, Giulia & Pierucci, Sauro & Ranzi, Eliseo & Manenti, Flavio, 2016. "Acid Gas to Syngas (AG2S™) technology applied to solid fuel gasification: Cutting H2S and CO2 emissions by improving syngas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1284-1291.
    9. Kobayashi, Makoto & Akiho, Hiroyuki & Nakao, Yoshinobu, 2015. "Performance evaluation of porous sodium aluminate sorbent for halide removal process in oxy-fuel IGCC power generation plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 320-327.
    10. Jang, Hayoung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin & Ha, Seungman & Nam, Dong, 2021. "Demystifying the lifecycle environmental benefits and harms of LNG as marine fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Mushtaq, Faisal & Mat, Ramli & Ani, Farid Nasir, 2014. "A review on microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass for fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 555-574.
    12. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    13. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    14. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    15. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Bauer, Fredric & Hulteberg, Christian, 2014. "Isobutanol from glycerine – A techno-economic evaluation of a new biofuel production process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 261-268.
    17. Zhihua Zhang, 2015. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities Coupled to Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1069-1080, November.
    18. Caspeta, Luis & Caro-Bermúdez, Mario A. & Ponce-Noyola, Teresa & Martinez, Alfredo, 2014. "Enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings for the conversion of agave bagasse to fuel ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 277-286.
    19. Liu, Xiong & Godbole, Ajit & Lu, Cheng & Michal, Guillaume & Venton, Philip, 2014. "Source strength and dispersion of CO2 releases from high-pressure pipelines: CFD model using real gas equation of state," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 56-68.
    20. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:183:y:2016:i:c:p:1616-1632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.