IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v252y2021ics0378377421001499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assimilation of soil moisture and canopy cover data improves maize simulation using an under-calibrated crop model

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Yang
  • Chibarabada, Tendai P.
  • Ziliani, Matteo G.
  • Onema, Jean-Marie Kileshye
  • McCabe, Matthew F.
  • Sheffield, Justin

Abstract

Parameter calibration is normally required prior to crop model simulation, which can be a time-consuming and data-intensive task. Meanwhile, the growth stages of different hybrids/cultivars of the same crop often show some similarities, which implies that phenological parameters calibrated for one hybrid/cultivar may be useful for the simulation of another. In this study, a data assimilation framework is proposed to reduce the requirement for parameter calibration for maize simulation using AquaCrop. The phenological parameters were uniformly scaled from previous research performed in a different location for a different maize hybrid, and other parameters were taken from default settings in the model documentation. To constrain simulation uncertainties, soil moisture and canopy cover observations were assimilated both separately and jointly in order to update model states. The methodology was tested across a rain-fed field in Nebraska for 6 growing seasons. The results suggested that the under-calibrated model with uniformly scaled phenological parameters captured the temporal dynamics of crop growth, but may lead to large estimation bias. Data assimilation effectively improved model performance, and the joint assimilation outperformed single-variable assimilation. When soil moisture and canopy cover were jointly assimilated, the overall yield estimates (RMSE = 1.24 t/ha, nRMSE = 11.48%, R2 = 0.695) were improved over the no-assimilation case (RMSE = 2.01 t/ha, nRMSE = 18.61%, R2 = 0.338). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the improvement was still evident with temporally sparse soil moisture observations and a small ensemble size. Further testing using observations within 90 days after planting demonstrated that the method was able to predict yield around 3 months before harvest (RMSE = 1.7 t/ha, nRMSE = 15.74%). This study indicated that maize yield can be estimated and predicted accurately by monitoring the soil moisture and canopy status, which has potential for regional applications using remote sensing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Yang & Chibarabada, Tendai P. & Ziliani, Matteo G. & Onema, Jean-Marie Kileshye & McCabe, Matthew F. & Sheffield, Justin, 2021. "Assimilation of soil moisture and canopy cover data improves maize simulation using an under-calibrated crop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001499
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001499
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandhu, Rupinder & Irmak, Suat, 2019. "Performance of AquaCrop model in simulating maize growth, yield, and evapotranspiration under rainfed, limited and full irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Li, Yan & Zhou, Qingguo & Zhou, Jian & Zhang, Gaofeng & Chen, Chong & Wang, Jing, 2014. "Assimilating remote sensing information into a coupled hydrology-crop growth model to estimate regional maize yield in arid regions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 291(C), pages 15-27.
    3. Foster, T. & Brozović, N. & Butler, A.P. & Neale, C.M.U. & Raes, D. & Steduto, P. & Fereres, E. & Hsiao, T.C., 2017. "AquaCrop-OS: An open source version of FAO's crop water productivity model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 18-22.
    4. Sandhu, Rupinder & Irmak, Suat, 2019. "Assessment of AquaCrop model in simulating maize canopy cover, soil-water, evapotranspiration, yield, and water productivity for different planting dates and densities under irrigated and rainfed cond," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Jin, Xiuliang & Li, Zhenhai & Feng, Haikuan & Ren, Zhibin & Li, Shaokun, 2020. "Estimation of maize yield by assimilating biomass and canopy cover derived from hyperspectral data into the AquaCrop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Bouman, B. A. M. & van Keulen, H. & van Laar, H. H. & Rabbinge, R., 1996. "The `School of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: A pedigree and historical overview," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(2-3), pages 171-198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linker, Raphael & Kisekka, Isaya, 2022. "Concurrent data assimilation and model-based optimization of irrigation scheduling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Lu, Yang & Wei, Chunzhu & McCabe, Matthew F. & Sheffield, Justin, 2022. "Multi-variable assimilation into a modified AquaCrop model for improved maize simulation without management or crop phenology information," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Li, Xuemin & Zhang, Jingwen & Cai, Ximing & Huo, Zailin & Zhang, Chenglong, 2023. "Simulation-optimization based real-time irrigation scheduling: A human-machine interactive method enhanced by data assimilation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Wang, Yongqiang & Huang, Donghua & Sun, Kexin & Shen, Hongzheng & Xing, Xuguang & Liu, Xiao & Ma, Xiaoyi, 2023. "Multiobjective optimization of regional irrigation and nitrogen schedules by using the CERES-Maize model with crop parameters determined from the remotely sensed leaf area index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    5. He, Liuyue & Xue, Jingyuan & Wang, Sufen, 2023. "WHCrop: A novel water-heat driven crop model for estimating the spatiotemporal dynamics of crop growth for arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    6. Emmanuel Lekakis & Athanasios Zaikos & Alexios Polychronidis & Christos Efthimiou & Ioannis Pourikas & Theano Mamouka, 2022. "Evaluation of Different Modelling Techniques with Fusion of Satellite, Soil and Agro-Meteorological Data for the Assessment of Durum Wheat Yield under a Large Scale Application," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Corbari, C. & Ben Charfi, I. & Al Bitar, A. & Skokovic, D. & Sobrino, J.A. & Perelli, C. & Branca, G. & Mancini, M., 2022. "A fully coupled crop-water-energy balance model based on satellite data for maize and tomato crops yield estimates: The FEST-EWB-SAFY model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Luo, Li & Sun, Shikun & Xue, Jing & Gao, Zihan & Zhao, Jinfeng & Yin, Yali & Gao, Fei & Luan, Xiaobo, 2023. "Crop yield estimation based on assimilation of crop models and remote sensing data: A systematic evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Yang & Wei, Chunzhu & McCabe, Matthew F. & Sheffield, Justin, 2022. "Multi-variable assimilation into a modified AquaCrop model for improved maize simulation without management or crop phenology information," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Feng, Dingrui & Li, Guangyong & Wang, Dan & Wulazibieke, Mierguli & Cai, Mingkun & Kang, Jing & Yuan, Zicheng & Xu, Houcheng, 2022. "Evaluation of AquaCrop model performance under mulched drip irrigation for maize in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Wang, Haidong & Cheng, Minghui & Liao, Zhenqi & Guo, Jinjin & Zhang, Fucang & Fan, Junliang & Feng, Hao & Yang, Qiliang & Wu, Lifeng & Wang, Xiukang, 2023. "Performance evaluation of AquaCrop and DSSAT-SUBSTOR-Potato models in simulating potato growth, yield and water productivity under various drip fertigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Xiang, Youzhen & Liu, Xiaoqiang & Liao, Zhenqi & Abdelghany, Ahmed Elsayed & Zhang, Fucang & Li, Zhijun, 2022. "Evaluation of AquaCrop model for greenhouse cherry tomato with plastic film mulch under various water and nitrogen supplies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Irmak, S. & Sandhu, R. & Kukal, M.S., 2022. "Multi-model projections of trade-offs between irrigated and rainfed maize yields under changing climate and future emission scenarios," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Keikha, Mahdi & Darzi- Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Valipour, Mohammad, 2023. "Effect of nitrogen management on the environmental and economic sustainability of wheat production in different climates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Kelly, T.D. & Foster, T. & Schultz, David M., 2023. "Assessing the value of adapting irrigation strategies within the season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Alex Zizinga & Jackson Gilbert Majaliwa Mwanjalolo & Britta Tietjen & Bobe Bedadi & Ramon Amaro de Sales & Dennis Beesigamukama, 2022. "Simulating Maize Productivity under Selected Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Using AquaCrop Model in a Sub-humid Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Lescourret, F. & Blecher, N. & Habib, R. & Chadoeuf, J. & Agostini, D. & Pailly, O. & Vaissiere, B. & Poggi, I., 1999. "Development of a simulation model for studying kiwi fruit orchard management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 215-239, February.
    10. Tsakmakis, I.D. & Gikas, G.D. & Sylaios, G.K., 2021. "Integration of Sentinel-derived NDVI to reduce uncertainties in the operational field monitoring of maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Dzikiti, S. & Lotter, D. & Mpandeli, S. & Nhamo, L., 2022. "Assessing the energy and water balance dynamics of rain-fed rooibos tea crops (Aspalathus linearis) under changing Mediterranean climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    12. Adam, M. & Wery, J. & Leffelaar, P.A. & Ewert, F. & Corbeels, M. & Van Keulen, H., 2013. "A systematic approach for re-assembly of crop models: An example to simulate pea growth from wheat growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 258-268.
    13. Confalonieri, Roberto & Acutis, Marco & Bellocchi, Gianni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2009. "Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1395-1410.
    14. Luo, Li & Sun, Shikun & Xue, Jing & Gao, Zihan & Zhao, Jinfeng & Yin, Yali & Gao, Fei & Luan, Xiaobo, 2023. "Crop yield estimation based on assimilation of crop models and remote sensing data: A systematic evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Raes, Dirk & Geerts, Sam & Kipkorir, Emmanuel & Wellens, Joost & Sahli, Ali, 2006. "Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 335-357, March.
    16. Masseroni, Daniele & Gangi, Fabiola & Galli, Andrea & Ceriani, Rodolfo & De Gaetani, Carlo & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2022. "Behind the efficiency of border irrigation: Lesson learned in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Foster, T. & Brozović, N., 2018. "Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-21.
    18. Nyathi, M.K. & Van Halsema, G.E. & Beletse, Y.G. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2018. "Nutritional water productivity of selected leafy vegetables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 111-122.
    19. Nyathi, M.K. & van Halsema, G.E. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2018. "Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for repeatedly harvested leafy vegetables grown under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 107-119.
    20. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.