IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v252y2021ics0378377421001463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FAO56 crop and water stress coefficients for cotton using subsurface drip irrigation in an arid US climate

Author

Listed:
  • Hunsaker, D.J.
  • Bronson, K.F.

Abstract

Water shortages are a continuing reality for today’s irrigated agriculture especially in the arid US southwest where cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an important crop. Decreasing water availability in the region coupled with high cotton water requirements are inducing water conservation practices, including adoption of subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and deficit irrigation management. A 3-year cotton study (2016, 2017, and 2018) was conducted on a sandy loam soil using SDI at Maricopa, Arizona, USA. The objectives were to determine the actual single (Kc act) and basal (Kcb act) crop coefficients, corresponding growth stage lengths, and water stress adjustment criterion for estimating crop evapotranspiration (ETc) by the widely used FAO56 crop coefficient procedures. Treatments evaluated were full irrigation (100%) and deficit irrigation (70%), both replicated three times and managed at an optimum N rate. Irrigation scheduling was based on a FAO56 Kcb curve locally developed in earlier studies at the Maricopa location using furrow irrigation. Actual ETc (ETc act) was determined by a soil water balance using 0–1.9-m soil profile water content measurements made every 6–14-days. The study also quantified the effects on ETc act and yield due to the deficit irrigation treatment. ETc act rates were high for the 100% treatment, often exceeding 12.0 mm d−1 during the mid-season stage in all years. Cumulative ETc act for the 100% treatment was 961, 1039, and 1008 mm; and lint yield was 1470, 1780, and 2200 kg ha−1 in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Treatment effects on both ETc act and cotton yield were significant in all years. Cumulative ETc act for the 70% treatment was 21–23% less than that for the 100% in each year. Lint yields for the 70% treatments were reduced 15–16% in two of the years, and by 36% in 2017 when soil water stress occurred earlier in the growing season. The 3-year average values of Kc act and Kcb act at mid-season were 1.31 and 1.26, respectively. Though higher than those previously reported for cotton at this location, these mid-season values are considered appropriate in this arid climate when using SDI and were consistent with the FAO56 mid-season standard cotton values after local climate adjustment. The observed average Kc act and Kcb act during the initial stage were ≈ 0.21 and they were 0.37 at the end of season, closely agreeing with the FAO56 tabulated cotton values for those stages. The average growth stage lengths determined for the SDI cotton are 33, 42, 51, and 28 for the initial, development, mid-season, and late season stages, respectively. The FAO56 water stress coefficient (Ks) was modeled for the 70% treatment using five different baseline values of depletion fraction for no stress (p) that varied from 0.60 to 0.70 in 0.025 increments. Best correlation coefficients (r) between the ETc act ratio of the 70% and 100% treatments with the modeled Ks of the 70% treatment were obtained with baseline p values of 0.60, 0.675, and 0.675 in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. The three 3-year average baseline p value of 0.65, which is the same baseline p value for cotton in FAO56, is recommended for estimating ETc reduction due to water stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunsaker, D.J. & Bronson, K.F., 2021. "FAO56 crop and water stress coefficients for cotton using subsurface drip irrigation in an arid US climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001463
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001463
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayars, J. E. & Phene, C. J. & Hutmacher, R. B. & Davis, K. R. & Schoneman, R. A. & Vail, S. S. & Mead, R. M., 1999. "Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Hunsaker, D.J. & French, A.N. & Waller, P.M. & Bautista, E. & Thorp, K.R. & Bronson, K.F. & Andrade-Sanchez, P., 2015. "Comparison of traditional and ET-based irrigation scheduling of surface-irrigated cotton in the arid southwestern USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 209-224.
    3. Hunsaker, D.J & Elshikha, D.M. & Bronson, K.F., 2019. "High guayule rubber production with subsurface drip irrigation in the US desert Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Goebel, Timothy S. & Lascano, Robert J., 2019. "Rainwater use by cotton under subsurface drip and center pivot irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 1-7.
    5. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    6. Ayars, J.E. & Fulton, A. & Taylor, B., 2015. "Subsurface drip irrigation in California—Here to stay?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 39-47.
    7. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunfeng Li & Quanqing Feng & Dongwei Li & Mingfa Li & Huifeng Ning & Qisheng Han & Abdoul Kader Mounkaila Hamani & Yang Gao & Jingsheng Sun, 2022. "Water-Salt Thresholds of Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Film Drip Irrigation in Arid Saline-Alkali Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Mingze Yao & Manman Gao & Jingkuan Wang & Bo Li & Lizhen Mao & Mingyu Zhao & Zhanyang Xu & Hongfei Niu & Tieliang Wang & Lei Sun & Dongshuang Niu, 2023. "Estimating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato under Different Irrigation Levels Using a Modified Dual Crop Coefficient Model in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Gao, Yang & Yang, Linlin & Shen, Xiaojun & Li, Xinqiang & Sun, Jingsheng & Duan, Aiwang & Wu, Laosheng, 2014. "Winter wheat with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI): Crop coefficients, water-use estimates, and effects of SDI on grain yield and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    5. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Pisciotta, Antonino & Di Lorenzo, Rosario & Santalucia, Gioacchino & Barbagallo, Maria Gabriella, 2018. "Response of grapevine (Cabernet Sauvignon cv) to above ground and subsurface drip irrigation under arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 122-131.
    7. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Ramos, Tiago B. & Darouich, Hanaa & Oliveira, Ana R. & Farzamian, Mohammad & Monteiro, Tomás & Castanheira, Nádia & Paz, Ana & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Pereira, Luís S., 2023. "Water use and soil water balance of Mediterranean tree crops assessed with the SIMDualKc model in orchards of southern Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Schmidt, Jennifer E. & Peterson, Caitlin & Wang, Daoyuan & Scow, Kate M. & Gaudin, Amélie C.M., 2018. "Agroecosystem tradeoffs associated with conversion to subsurface drip irrigation in organic systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Amazirh, Abdelhakim & Er-Raki, Salah & Ojha, Nitu & Bouras, El houssaine & Rivalland, Vincent & Merlin, Olivier & Chehbouni, Abdelghani, 2022. "Assimilation of SMAP disaggregated soil moisture and Landsat land surface temperature to improve FAO-56 estimates of ET in semi-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Cao, Yuxin & Cai, Huanjie & Sun, Shikun & Gu, Xiaobo & Mu, Qing & Duan, Weina & Zhao, Zhengxin, 2022. "Effects of drip irrigation methods on yield and water productivity of maize in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Geng, Qingling & Zhao, Yongkun & Sun, Shikun & He, Xiaohui & Wang, Dong & Wu, Dingrong & Tian, Zhihui, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes and its driving forces of irrigation water requirements for cotton in Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    13. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    15. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Himanshu, Sushil Kumar & Ale, Srinivasulu & Bordovsky, James & Darapuneni, Murali, 2019. "Evaluation of crop-growth-stage-based deficit irrigation strategies for cotton production in the Southern High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Haomiao Cheng & Qilin Yu & Mohmed A. M. Abdalhi & Fan Li & Zhiming Qi & Tengyi Zhu & Wei Cai & Xiaoping Chen & Shaoyuan Feng, 2022. "RZWQM2 Simulated Drip Fertigation Management to Improve Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize in a Solar Greenhouse," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    19. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    20. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.