IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v252y2021ics0378377421001426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial decision support system for ameliorating adverse impacts of irrigated agriculture on aquatic ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Fields, Christopher M.
  • Labadie, John W.
  • Rohmat, Faizal I.W.
  • Johnson, Lynn E.

Abstract

Tributary stream systems provide an important source of water for sustaining adjacent irrigated agricultural enterprises. Unfortunately, irrigation withdrawals, depending on the timing and amounts, can have substantial negative impacts on critical aquatic ecosystems in the tributaries. Current regulatory trends in many regions point to increased restrictions on irrigation diversions for ecosystem protection, which could lead to increased risk of shortfalls in agricultural crop production. A geospatial decision support system (geo-DSS) integrating a spatially gridded hydro-meteorological flow estimation model (HL-RDHM) with a GIS-based river basin management model (GeoMODSIM) is presented for evaluating water management alternatives for maintaining the viability of irrigated agriculture while mollifying detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems and maintaining environmental flow requirements. As a case study, the geo-DSS is applied to the Feliz Creek basin tributary to the Russian River of northern coastal California which is home to a thriving viticulture industry while supporting spawning habitat for endangered and threatened fish species. The geo-DSS is applied on spatial (~1 km grid size) and temporal (daily) scales that are ecologically relevant for modeling agricultural operations and water rights priorities. The geo-DSS utilizes extensive sets of hydrologic forcing data varying from dry to wet conditions to assess baseline conditions and evaluate management alternatives. Baseline model results show that with minimum bypass flow restrictions in place for instream flow protection, the cumulative effects of upstream diversions can still be significant during low flow periods, while creating substantial risk of agricultural irrigation supply shortages. The case study application demonstrates that the geo-DSS is capable of locating, sizing, and managing off-stream farm ponds receiving optimally timed diversions from adjacent streams that are necessary for maintaining agricultural water supply while complying with environmental flow requirements for sustaining aquatic ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Fields, Christopher M. & Labadie, John W. & Rohmat, Faizal I.W. & Johnson, Lynn E., 2021. "Geospatial decision support system for ameliorating adverse impacts of irrigated agriculture on aquatic ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Deitch & Adina Merenlender & Shane Feirer, 2013. "Cumulative Effects of Small Reservoirs on Streamflow in Northern Coastal California Catchments," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(15), pages 5101-5118, December.
    2. Khan, Shahbaz & Tariq, Rana & Yuanlai, Cui & Blackwell, J., 2006. "Can irrigation be sustainable?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 87-99, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wichelns, Dennis & Oster, J.D., 2006. "Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 114-127, November.
    2. Jackson, Tamara M. & Khan, Shahbaz & Hafeez, Mohsin, 2010. "A comparative analysis of water application and energy consumption at the irrigated field level," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1477-1485, October.
    3. Chuang-lin Fang & Chao Bao & Jin-chuan Huang, 2007. "Management Implications to Water Resources Constraint Force on Socio-economic System in Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor, NW China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(9), pages 1613-1633, September.
    4. Ruchie Pathak & Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2022. "Assessing the Representativeness of Irrigation Adoption Studies: A Meta-Study of Global Research," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Yong Peng & Xinguo Sun & Xiaoli Zhang & Huicheng Zhou & Zixin Zhang, 2017. "A Flood Forecasting Model that Considers the Impact of Hydraulic Projects by the Simulations of the Aggregate reservoir’s Retaining and Discharging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(3), pages 1031-1045, February.
    6. Kaune, Alexander & Werner, Micha & Rodríguez, Erasmo & Karimi, Poolad & de Fraiture, Charlotte, 2017. "A novel tool to assess available hydrological information and the occurrence of sub-optimal water allocation decisions in large irrigation districts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 229-238.
    7. James Stoutenborough & Arnold Vedlitz, 2014. "Public Attitudes Toward Water Management and Drought in the United States," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(3), pages 697-714, February.
    8. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Molden, David & Wichelns, Dennis, 2010. "Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: An overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 495-501, April.
    9. Bouman, B. A.M. & Feng, Liping & Tuong, T.P. & Lu, Guoan & Wang, Huaqi & Feng, Yuehua, 2007. "Exploring options to grow rice using less water in northern China using a modelling approach: II. Quantifying yield, water balance components, and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 23-33, March.
    10. Udinart Prata Rabelo & Alexandre C. Costa & Jörg Dietrich & Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour & Pieter Van Oel & Iran Eduardo Lima Neto, 2022. "Impact of Dense Networks of Reservoirs on Streamflows at Dryland Catchments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Khan, S. & Khan, M.A. & Hanjra, M.A. & Mu, J., 2009. "Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 141-149, April.
    12. Alexander Kaune & Patricia López & Anouk Gevaert & Ted Veldkamp & Micha Werner & Charlotte Fraiture, 2020. "The Benefit of Using an Ensemble of Global Hydrological Models in Surface Water Availability for Irrigation Area Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(7), pages 2221-2240, May.
    13. D.-A. An-Vo & S. Mushtaq & T. Nguyen-Ky & J. Bundschuh & T. Tran-Cong & T. Maraseni & K. Reardon-Smith, 2015. "Nonlinear Optimisation Using Production Functions to Estimate Economic Benefit of Conjunctive Water Use for Multicrop Production," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2153-2170, May.
    14. Reca, Juan & García-Manzano, Alfonso & Martínez, Juan, 2015. "Optimal pumping scheduling model considering reservoir evaporation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 250-257.
    15. Khan, Shahbaz & Hanjra, Munir A., 2009. "Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production - Global perspectives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 130-140, April.
    16. Khan, Shahbaz & Rana, Tariq & Hanjra, Munir A., 2008. "A cross disciplinary framework for linking farms with regional groundwater and salinity management targets," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 35-47, January.
    17. Xinyu Wan & Lijuan Hua & Shutan Yang & Hoshin V. Gupta & Ping’an Zhong, 2018. "Evaluating the Impacts of a Large-Scale Multi-Reservoir System on Flooding: Case of the Huai River in China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 1013-1033, February.
    18. Yiming Wei & Zengchuan Dong, 2021. "Application of a Novel Jaya Algorithm Based on Chaotic Sequence and Opposition-based Learning in the Multi-objective Optimal Operation of Cascade Hydropower Stations System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(5), pages 1397-1413, March.
    19. Khawar Naeem & Adel Zghibi & Adel Elomri & Annamaria Mazzoni & Chefi Triki, 2023. "A Literature Review on System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Management of Water Supply and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Andrew Lewis & James Montgomery & Max Lewis & Marcus Randall & Karin Schiller, 2023. "Business As Usual Versus Climate-responsive, Optimised Crop Plans – A Predictive Model for Irrigated Agriculture in Australia in 2060," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2721-2735, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.