IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v208y2018icp406-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of different drip irrigation strategies on irrigation water use efficiency on chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) crop

Author

Listed:
  • Pascual-Seva, Núria
  • San Bautista, Alberto
  • López-Galarza, Salvador
  • Maroto, José Vicente
  • Pascual, Bernardo

Abstract

Chufa is a typical crop in Valencia, Spain, where it is cultivated in ridges with furrow irrigation. It uses large volumes of water, and thus, different studies have been undertaken to maximize irrigation water use efficiency to obtain important water savings. Particularly, different values for turning water on, considering the basis of volumetric soil water content were analysed in drip irrigation. It was reported that starting each irrigation event when the volumetric soil water content dropped to 90% of the field capacity resulted in the best yield, and the best irrigation water use efficiency was obtained when it dropped to 80% of the field capacity. However, these results may be improved by defining the optimum criteria for turning water off, which is the aim of the present research. This investigation, conducted in 2015, 2016 and 2017, analises the productive response of the drip irrigated chufa crop, determining the yield and the irrigation water use efficiency. The volumetric soil water content was monitored using multi-depth capacitance probes, with sensors at 0.10, 0.20 and 0.30 m below the top of the ridge. Each irrigation event started when the volumetric soil water content at 0.10 m dropped to 85% of field capacity. Three irrigation strategies were considered. T1: each event resulting in water being turned off when the sum of the volumetric soil water content values that were measured at 0.10, 0.20 and 0.30 m reached the corresponding field capacity value; T2: turning water off in each event when the volumetric soil water content values that were measured at 0.20 m reached the corresponding field capacity value; and T3: each irrigation event applying 8.5 mm in 2015 and 2016, as well as 9.8 mm in 2017. Overall, the T2 strategy resulted in the largest yield, and T3 resulted in the highest irrigation water use efficiency in 2015 and 2016. The average tuber weight and dry matter content did not differ between the irrigation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascual-Seva, Núria & San Bautista, Alberto & López-Galarza, Salvador & Maroto, José Vicente & Pascual, Bernardo, 2018. "Influence of different drip irrigation strategies on irrigation water use efficiency on chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) crop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 406-413.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:208:y:2018:i:c:p:406-413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418309715
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cabello, M.J. & Castellanos, M.T. & Romojaro, F. & Martnez-Madrid, C. & Ribas, F., 2009. "Yield and quality of melon grown under different irrigation and nitrogen rates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 866-874, May.
    2. Pascual-Seva, N. & San Bautista, A. & López-Galarza, S. & Maroto, J.V. & Pascual, B., 2016. "Response of drip-irrigated chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) to different planting configurations: Yield and irrigation water-use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 140-147.
    3. Leib, Brian G. & Hattendorf, Mary & Elliott, Todd & Matthews, Gary, 2002. "Adoption and adaptation of scientific irrigation scheduling: trends from Washington, USA as of 1998," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 105-120, June.
    4. Thompson, R.B. & Gallardo, M. & Valdez, L.C. & Fernandez, M.D., 2007. "Determination of lower limits for irrigation management using in situ assessments of apparent crop water uptake made with volumetric soil water content sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 13-28, August.
    5. Abrisqueta, I. & Vera, J. & Tapia, L.M. & Abrisqueta, J.M. & Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C., 2012. "Soil water content criteria for peach trees water stress detection during the postharvest period," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 62-67.
    6. Tolk, Judy A. & Howell, Terry A., 2003. "Water use efficiencies of grain sorghum grown in three USA southern Great Plains soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 97-111, March.
    7. Vera, J. & Mounzer, O. & Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C. & Abrisqueta, I. & Tapia, L.M. & Abrisqueta, J.M., 2009. "Soil water balance trial involving capacitance and neutron probe measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 905-911, June.
    8. Varble, J.L. & Chávez, J.L., 2011. "Performance evaluation and calibration of soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern Colorado," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 93-106.
    9. Thompson, R.B. & Gallardo, M. & Valdez, L.C. & Fernandez, M.D., 2007. "Using plant water status to define threshold values for irrigation management of vegetable crops using soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 147-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascual-Seva, N. & San Bautista, A. & López-Galarza, S. & Maroto, J.V. & Pascual, B., 2016. "Response of drip-irrigated chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) to different planting configurations: Yield and irrigation water-use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 140-147.
    2. Abdelkhalik, Abdelsattar & Pascual-Seva, Nuria & Nájera, Inmaculada & Giner, Alfonso & Baixauli, Carlos & Pascual, Bernardo, 2019. "Yield response of seedless watermelon to different drip irrigation strategies under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 99-110.
    3. Beyá-Marshall, Víctor & Arcos, Emilia & Seguel, Óscar & Galleguillos, Mauricio & Kremer, Cristián, 2022. "Optimal irrigation management for avocado (cv. 'Hass') trees by monitoring soil water content and plant water status," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Nolz, R. & Cepuder, P. & Balas, J. & Loiskandl, W., 2016. "Soil water monitoring in a vineyard and assessment of unsaturated hydraulic parameters as thresholds for irrigation management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 164(P2), pages 235-242.
    5. Kassaye, Kassu Tadesse & Boulange, Julien & Lam, Van Thinh & Saito, Hirotaka & Watanabe, Hirozumi, 2020. "Monitoring soil water content for decision supporting in agricultural water management based on critical threshold values adopted for Andosol in the temperate monsoon climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Li, Yi-Jie & Yuan, Bao-Zhong & Bie, Zhi-Long & Kang, Yaohu, 2012. "Effect of drip irrigation criteria on yield and quality of muskmelon grown in greenhouse conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 30-35.
    7. Blanco, Víctor & Domingo, Rafael & Pérez-Pastor, Alejandro & Blaya-Ros, Pedro José & Torres-Sánchez, Roque, 2018. "Soil and plant water indicators for deficit irrigation management of field-grown sweet cherry trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 83-94.
    8. Mira-García, Ana Belén & Conejero, Wenceslao & Vera, Juan & Ruiz-Sánchez, M.Carmen, 2022. "Water status and thermal response of lime trees to irrigation and shade screen," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    9. Incrocci, Luca & Thompson, Rodney B. & Fernandez-Fernandez, María Dolores & De Pascale, Stefania & Pardossi, Alberto & Stanghellini, Cecilia & Rouphael, Youssef & Gallardo, Marisa, 2020. "Irrigation management of European greenhouse vegetable crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Chen, Xiaoping & Qi, Zhiming & Gui, Dongwei & Sima, Matthew W. & Zeng, Fanjiang & Li, Lanhai & Li, Xiangyi & Gu, Zhe, 2020. "Evaluation of a new irrigation decision support system in improving cotton yield and water productivity in an arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Nolz, R. & Kammerer, G. & Cepuder, P., 2013. "Calibrating soil water potential sensors integrated into a wireless monitoring network," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 12-20.
    12. Conesa, María R. & Conejero, Wenceslao & Vera, Juan & Agulló, Vicente & García-Viguera, Cristina & Ruiz-Sánchez, M. Carmen, 2021. "Irrigation management practices in nectarine fruit quality at harvest and after cold storage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. de Azevedo, Pedro Vieira & de Sousa, Inaja Francisco & da Silva, Bernardo Barbosa & da Silva, Vicente de Paulo Rodrigues, 2006. "Water-use efficiency of dwarf-green coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) orchards in northeast Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 259-264, August.
    14. Abdelfatah, Ashraf & Aranda, Xavier & Savé, Robert & de Herralde, Felicidad & Biel, Carmen, 2013. "Evaluation of the response of maximum daily shrinkage in young cherry trees submitted to water stress cycles in a greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 150-158.
    15. Abrisqueta, I. & Vera, J. & Tapia, L.M. & Abrisqueta, J.M. & Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C., 2012. "Soil water content criteria for peach trees water stress detection during the postharvest period," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 62-67.
    16. Pedro Garcia-Caparros & Juana Isabel Contreras & Rafael Baeza & Maria Luz Segura & Maria Teresa Lao, 2017. "Integral Management of Irrigation Water in Intensive Horticultural Systems of Almería," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Hong, Minki & Lee, Sang-Hyun & Lee, Seung-Jae & Choi, Jin-Yong, 2021. "Application of high-resolution meteorological data from NCAM-WRF to characterize agricultural drought in small-scale farmlands based on soil moisture deficit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    18. Michaela ŠKEŘÍKOVÁ & Václav BRANT & Milan KROULÍK & Jan PIVEC & Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ & Josef HAKL & Michael HOFBAUER, 2018. "Water demands and biomass production of sorghum and maize plants in areas with insufficient precipitation in Central Europe," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 367-378.
    19. N. Maier & J. Dietrich, 2016. "Using SWAT for Strategic Planning of Basin Scale Irrigation Control Policies: a Case Study from a Humid Region in Northern Germany," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 3285-3298, July.
    20. Migliaccio, Kati W. & Schaffer, Bruce & Crane, Jonathan H. & Davies, Frederick S., 2010. "Plant response to evapotranspiration and soil water sensor irrigation scheduling methods for papaya production in south Florida," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1452-1460, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:208:y:2018:i:c:p:406-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.