IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accfor/v32y2008i1p46-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Web assurance services on e-commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Runyan, Bruce
  • Smith, Katherine T.
  • Smith, L. Murphy

Abstract

The ongoing rapid growth in the popularity of the Internet is having a revolutionary impact on the way companies do business. Doing business online has become a necessity, not an option. However, some consumers are not completely comfortable using the Internet for transacting business because of concerns regarding security of their transactions. For these situations, consumer trust and confidence can be enhanced by a Web assurance service such as AICPA Trust Services. Building on prior studies, the study provides comprehensive information on current reporting requirements, differences among Web assurance services, and results of a recent consumer survey to obtain perceptions of Web assurance services. The theoretical foundation of the current study is based on the Assurance Gaps Model [Burke, K. G., Kovar, S. E., & Prenshaw, P. J. (2004). Unraveling the Expectations Gap: An Assurance Gaps Model and illustrative application. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 7, 169–193]. E-business consumers (users of Web assurance services) can be dichotomized into older consumers and younger consumers, who have different expectations based on information asymmetries. Findings indicate that consumers value Web Assurance services, but younger consumers place greater value on these services than older consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Runyan, Bruce & Smith, Katherine T. & Smith, L. Murphy, 2008. "Implications of Web assurance services on e-commerce," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 46-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:1:p:46-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2007.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S015599820700066X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2007.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashton, Rh & Kramer, Ss, 1980. "Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Emilio Boulianne & Charles H. Cho, 2009. "The Rise And Fall Of Webtrust," Post-Print halshs-00459412, HAL.
    3. Orthodoxia Kyriacou & Jatin Pancholi & Angathevar Baskaran, 2010. "(Re)presentation of women in Indian accountancy bodies' web sites," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 329-352, August.
    4. Boulianne, Emilio & Cho, Charles H., 2009. "The rise and fall of WebTrust," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 229-244.
    5. David S. Kerr & Karen A. Loveland & Katherine Taken Smith & Lawrence Murphy Smith, 2023. "Cryptocurrency Risks, Fraud Cases, and Financial Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.
    2. Bahigansenga Silas, 2023. "Effect of Parental Engagement on Students’ Performance in Bugesera District, Rwanda," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 1878-1894, August.
    3. Bauermeister, Golo & Musshoff, Oliver, 2016. "Risk Aversion and Inconsistencies - Does the Choice of Risk Elicitation Method and Display Format Influence the Outcomes?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235348, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Kevin Keasey & Philip Moon & Darren Duxbury, 2000. "Performance measurement and the use of league tables: some experimental evidence of dysfunctional consequences," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 275-286.
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1994. "Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: experimental results," MPRA Paper 81684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    7. Duxbury, Darren, 2012. "Sunk costs and sunk benefits: A re-examination of re-investment decisions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 144-156.
    8. Dezoort, F. T., 1998. "An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Claus Holm & Pall Rikhardsson, 2008. "Experienced and Novice Investors: Does Environmental Information Influence Investment Allocation Decisions?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 537-557.
    10. Armstrong, J. Scott & Coviello, Nicole & Safranek, Barbara, 1993. "Escalation bias: does it extend to marketing?," MPRA Paper 81685, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Lindawati Gani & Johnny Jermias, 2012. "The Effects of Strategy–Management Control System Misfits on Firm Performance," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 165-196, September.
    12. Basoglu, K. Asli & Fuller, Mark A. & Sweeney, John T., 2009. "Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 177-189.
    13. Ica Rika Candraningrat & Ubud Salim & Nur Khusniyah Indrawati & Kusuma Ratnawati, 2018. "Influence of Framing Information and Disposition Effect in Decision of Investment: Experimental Study on Investor Behavior at Indonesia Stock Exchange Representative on Denpasar, Bali," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 59-68.
    14. Pall Rikhardsson & Claus Holm, 2008. "The effect of environmental information on investment allocation decisions – an experimental study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(6), pages 382-397, September.
    15. Mario Biggeri & Domenico Colucci & Nicola Doni & Vincenzo Valori, 2022. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Good Deeds, Business, Social and Environmental Responsibility in a Market Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Nigel Barradale & Thomas Plenborg & Simone Staehr, 2022. "Investor feedback: impact on analyst biases and investor critical evaluation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 767-803, March.
    17. Linda Espahbodi & Reza Espahbodi & Norma Juma & Amy Westbrook, 2019. "Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 149-167, January.
    18. Lawrence, Michael & Sim, William, 1999. "Prototyping a financial DSS," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 445-450, August.
    19. Fochmann, Martin & Müller, Nadja & Overesch, Michael, 2018. "Less cheating? The effects of prefilled forms on compliance behavior," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 227, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    20. Mortensen, Tony & Fisher, Richard & Wines, Graeme, 2012. "Students as surrogates for practicing accountants: Further evidence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 251-265.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:1:p:46-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/accounting-forum .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.