IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00459412.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Rise And Fall Of Webtrust

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Boulianne

    (John Molson School of Business - Concordia University [Montreal])

  • Charles H. Cho

    (John Molson School of Business - Concordia University [Montreal])

Abstract

Despite the growth in electronic commerce (hereafter, "e-commerce") usage, consumers are still reluctant to purchase online due to security and privacy concerns. To alleviate this issue, e-commerce vendors may sign up with an independent third-party web assurance service to obtain a seal that is displayed on the vendor's website. The presence of such seal aims at sending a signal of trustworthiness and security to online shoppers. While prior research mainly focused on the impact of these web seals on consumers' perceptions and purchasing behaviors, little research has been conducted on the managerial decision-making process about the adoption, implementation, and the abandonment of such seals. Of particular interest here is the WebTrust seal, jointly developed by the AICPA and the CICA. We take a qualitative case study approach with the objective of understanding the motivations and rationale of a large North American telecommunications firm's management behind the decisions about the adoption, implementation, and abandonment of its WebTrust seal. Our case company was one of the first to obtain the seal on its online shopping website. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key executive officers involved in the decision-making process related to the seal. Results suggest that the implementation and the subsequent abandonment of WebTrust may be explained by several theoretical frameworks: managerial accounting perspective, organizational slack theory, innovation theory, but primarily and best through institutional theory. First, the case firm's needs of legitimacy, coupled with the endorsement of a recognized professional accountants association and the presence of a Big 4 accounting firm, led to the implementation of WebTrust. Second, when the benefits of WebTrust versus its costs were questioned, and that other companies increasingly abandoned the seal, the case firm decided to follow this trend to conform to prevailing values of appropriate business behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Boulianne & Charles H. Cho, 2009. "The Rise And Fall Of Webtrust," Post-Print halshs-00459412, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00459412
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00459412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00459412/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 43-58, January.
    2. Yves Gendron & Michael Barrett, 2004. "Professionalization in Action: Accountants' Attempt at Building a Network of Support for the WebTrust Seal of Assurance," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 563-602, September.
    3. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Radcliffe, Vaughan S. & Campbell, David R., 2006. "Accountancy before the fall: The AICPA vision project and related professional enterprises," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. E. Burton Swanson & Neil C. Ramiller, 1997. "The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(5), pages 458-474, October.
    5. Runyan, Bruce & Smith, Katherine T. & Smith, L. Murphy, 2008. "Implications of Web assurance services on e-commerce," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 46-61.
    6. Harvey Leibenstein, 1969. "Organizational or Frictional Equilibria, X-Efficiency, and the Rate of Innovation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 83(4), pages 600-623.
    7. Kathryn M. Kimery & Mary McCord, 2006. "Signals of Trustworthiness in E-Commerce: Consumer Understanding of Third-Party Assurance Seals," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 52-74, October.
    8. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    9. Fogarty, Timothy J., 1996. "The imagery and reality of peer review in the U.S.: Insights from institutional theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 243-267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gray, Glen L. & Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Li, Pei, 2014. "The expert systems life cycle in AIS research: What does it mean for future AIS research?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 423-451.
    2. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boulianne, Emilio & Cho, Charles H., 2009. "The rise and fall of WebTrust," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 229-244.
    2. Gregory Stock & Noel Greis & William Fischer, 2018. "Organisational Slack And New Product Time To Market Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-34, May.
    3. Wiklund, Johan & Baker, Ted & Shepherd, Dean, 2010. "The age-effect of financial indicators as buffers against the liability of newness," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 423-437, July.
    4. Ben Boubakary, 2022. "Audit interne et gouvernance d'entreprise : une lecture théorique au sein des entreprises publiques," Working Papers halshs-03705132, HAL.
    5. Robert H. Chenhall & Frank Moers, 2007. "The Issue of Endogeneity within Theory-Based, Quantitative Management Accounting Research," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 173-196.
    6. Bertrand Malsch & Yves Gendron, 2013. "Re-Theorizing Change: Institutional Experimentation and the Struggle for Domination in the Field of Public Accounting," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 870-899, July.
    7. Altaf, Nufazil & Shah, Farooq, 2017. "Slack heterogeneity and firm performance: Investigating the relationship in Indian context," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 390-403.
    8. Mike Wright & Luc Renneboog & Tomas Simons & Louise Scholes, 2006. "Leveraged Buyouts in the U.K. and Continental Europe: Retrospect and Prospect," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 18(3), pages 38-55, June.
    9. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10775 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    12. Marlin, Dan & Geiger, Scott W., 2015. "A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2683-2690.
    13. Young, Michael N. & McGuinness, Paul B., 2001. "The missing link: why stock markets have been ineffective in Chinese SOE reform," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 55-62.
    14. Fu, Fangjian & Lin, Leming & Officer, Micah S., 2013. "Acquisitions driven by stock overvaluation: Are they good deals?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 24-39.
    15. Tiantian Gu & Anand Venkateswaran, 2018. "Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 621-649, October.
    16. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    17. Chenini Hajer & Jarboui Anis, 2018. "Analysis of the Impact of Governance on Bank Performance: Case of Commercial Tunisian Banks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 871-895, September.
    18. Kuang, Yu Flora & Qin, Bo, 2009. "Performance-vested stock options and interest alignment," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 46-61.
    19. Claus Dierksmeier, 2011. "The Freedom–Responsibility Nexus in Management Philosophy and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 263-283, June.
    20. Charlie Weir & Oleksandr Talavera & Alexander Muravyev, 2011. "The Return on Human Capital: the Case of UK Non-executive Directors that are also Executive Directors," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 029, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    21. Carlos Jiménez-Angueira & Nathan Stuart, 2015. "Relative performance evaluation, pay-for-luck, and double-dipping in CEO compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 701-732, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00459412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.