IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2017-04-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separating and Merging Cash Flows: Investigating Five-element Cash Flows Statement

Author

Listed:
  • Hojatollah Atashi Golestani

    (Department of Accounting, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran,)

  • Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini

    (PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Babolsar University, Babolsar, Iran,)

  • Ehsan Mehrjoo

    (Department of Accounting, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.)

Abstract

In Iranian accounting standard, cash flows statement includes five elements. This is justifiable considering all discussions that exist in International Accounting Standard No.7 (IAS 7). This new representation method has raised many debates on its usefulness. In this study, cash flows from operations (CFO) were separated into different elements and the predictability of future earnings was examined by them as the most important criterion which would facilitate the evaluation of the performance along with net earnings. Using data of listed companies in Tehran stock exchange, results of testing research hypotheses showed that when a model including the elements of accruals and net CFO based on the IAS was used for predicting net earnings, separating CFO elements, disclosed by the direct method of representing cash flow statement and replacing these elements in the model did not increase the predictability of the model significantly. Also, the method of separating CFO into its gross sums based on IAS 7 had more predictability compared to the method of separating the items of cash flows into three (operating activities, return on investment and paid earnings for financing, and tax) elements according to Iranian Accounting Standard. Our results are applicable for the standard-makers and users of financial statements, developing disclosure literature in the financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Hojatollah Atashi Golestani & Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini & Ehsan Mehrjoo, 2017. "Separating and Merging Cash Flows: Investigating Five-element Cash Flows Statement," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 54-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/4486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/4486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neal Arthur & Marco Cheng & Robert Czernkowski, 2010. "Cash flow disaggregation and the prediction of future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1&2), pages 215-245.
    3. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    4. Abdul Hamid Habbe, 2017. "Estimation Error of Earnings Information: A Test of Representativeness and Anchoring-adjustment Heuristic," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 224-233.
    5. C. Cheng & Dana Hollie, 2008. "Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 29-53, July.
    6. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1‐2), pages 215-245, January.
    7. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Healy, Paul M., 1985. "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 85-107, April.
    9. Ahsan Habib, 2006. "Disaggregated earnings and prediction of future profitability: evidence from industrial groups in Japan," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 355-369, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Kent & Jacqueline Birt, 2021. "IAS 7 and value relevance: the direct method versus the indirect method," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1532-1586, December.
    2. Baljit K. Sidhu & CHUAN YU, 2021. "Direct Method Operating Cash Flow Disclosures: Determinants and Incremental Usefulness," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 421-467, September.
    3. Divesh Sharma & Errol Iselin, 2003. "The decision usefulness of reported cash flow and accrual information in a behavioural field experiment," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 123-135.
    4. Iain Clacher & Alan Duboisée Ricquebourg & Allan Hodgson, 2013. "The Value Relevance of Direct Cash Flows under International Financial Reporting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(3), pages 367-395, September.
    5. Ahmad Nasseri & Mohammad Sayyadi & Hassan Yazdifar & Rasol Eskandari & Mohammad Albahloul, 2018. "Causality between Cash Flow and Earnings: Evidence from Tehran (Iran) Stock Exchange," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2), pages 210-228, August.
    6. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    7. Coulton, Jeffrey J. & Saune, Naibuka & Taylor, Stephen L., 2022. "Are analysts' cash flow forecasts associated with improved earnings quality? Australian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Ehsan Khansalar & Eilnaz Kashefi-Pour, 2020. "The usefulness of the double entry constraint for predicting earnings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 51-67, January.
    9. Farshadfar, Shadi & Monem, Reza, 2013. "Further Evidence on the Usefulness of Direct Method Cash Flow Components for Forecasting Future Cash Flows," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 111-133.
    10. Richard Anthony Kent & Di Bu, 2020. "The importance of cash flow disclosure and cost of capital," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 877-908, April.
    11. Michael Bradbury, 2011. "Direct or Indirect Cash Flow Statements?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(2), pages 124-130, June.
    12. David Bond & Martin Bugeja & Robert Czernkowski, 2012. "Did Australian Firms Choose to Switch to Reporting Operating Cash Flows Using the Indirect Method?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(1), pages 18-24, March.
    13. Herwartz, Helmut & Reimers, Hans-Eggert, 2006. "Modelling the Fisher hypothesis: World wide evidence," Economics Working Papers 2006-04, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    14. Bilal Mehmood & Syed Hassan Raza & Mahwish Rana & Huma Sohaib & Muhammad Azhar Khan, 2014. "Triangular Relationship between Energy Consumption, Price Index and National Income in Asian Countries: A Pooled Mean Group Approach in Presence of Structural Breaks," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(4), pages 610-620.
    15. Jean C. Kouam & Simplice Asongu, 2022. "The non-linear effects of fixed broadband on economic growth in Africa," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 50(5), pages 881-895, August.
    16. Ranjan Aneja & Umer J. Banday & Tanzeem Hasnat & Mustafa Koçoglu, 2017. "Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Panel Error Correction Model," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 76-85, June.
    17. Bosker, Maarten & Brakman, Steven & Garretsen, Harry & Schramm, Marc, 2008. "A century of shocks: The evolution of the German city size distribution 1925-1999," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 330-347, July.
    18. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    19. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    20. Neil A. Wilmot & Ariuna Taivan, 2021. "Examining the Impact of Financial Development on Energy Production in Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Operating Cash Flows; Accruals; Predictive Ability; Accounting Standards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.