IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-21-01013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do wealth shocks matter for the life satisfaction of the elderly? Evidence from the health and retirement study

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Cozzi

    (University of Victoria)

  • Qiushan Li

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

We study the importance of wealth shocks as a determinant of life satisfaction for the elderly and near-elderly. With data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study, we specify an econometric analysis exploiting the 2008-09 financial crisis as a source of exogenous variation in wealth, caused by a long-lasting decrease in asset prices. Although absolute changes in wealth are not found to systematically affect individual well-being, losing 60% or more of the pre-crisis wealth negatively impacted measures of life satisfaction. The results are shown to hold also in a number of robustness checks. The financial crisis wealth shock is found to have a persistent detrimental effect on the well-being of the American elderly. Finally, we argue that the simultaneity bias arising from neglecting the endogeneity of wealth accumulation can be substantial.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Cozzi & Qiushan Li, 2024. "Do wealth shocks matter for the life satisfaction of the elderly? Evidence from the health and retirement study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(1), pages 88-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2024/Volume44/EB-24-V44-I1-P8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wealth; Uninsurable shocks; Life Satisfaction; Subjective Well-Being;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.