IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/81-14-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who cares? Die Bedeutung der informellen Pflege durch Erwerbstätige in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Geyer
  • Erika Schulz

Abstract

The daughter and son who take care of their parents or look after their neighbor who is no longer mobile while working at the same time: informal care is a central pillar of the German care system - particularly with regard to the aging population and the resultant increase in the demand for care. Between five and six percent of all adults regularly provide informal care according to DIW Berlin's calculations for the years 2001 to 2012 on the basis of data from the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Around 60 percent of these women and men are of working age. The proportion of people in employment among all informal carers below 65 years of age has risen from just under 53 to almost 66 percent. The increase was greater among full-time than part-time employees although those in full-time work combine caregiving and career significantly less frequently on average. The question arises how work and caregiving could be better reconciled because the need for (informal) care will continue to increase due to demographic change. The present report shows that informal carers are less satisfied in general and also with social security than those who do not provide informal care. However, the data give no indication that working at the same time amplifies this effect. Die Tochter und der Sohn, die neben der Arbeit ihre Eltern pflegen oder sich um ihre nicht mehr mobile Nachbarin kümmern: Informelle Pflegetätigkeiten sind eine zentrale Stütze des deutschen Pflegesystems - insbesondere angesichts der alternden Bevölkerung und des damit einhergehenden steigenden Pflegebedarfs. Zwischen fünf und sechs Prozent aller Erwachsenen leisten regelmäßig informelle Pflege, wie das DIW Berlin auf Grundlage von Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) für die Jahre 2001 bis 2012 berechnet hat. Rund 60 Prozent dieser Frauen und Männer sind im erwerbsfähigen Alter. Der Anteil der Erwerbstätigen an allen informell Pflegenden unter 65 Jahren ist von knapp 53 auf fast 66 Prozent gestiegen. Bei den Vollzeitbeschäftigten war der Anstieg stärker als bei den Teilzeitbeschäftigten, wenngleich Vollzeitbeschäftigte im Durchschnitt wesentlich seltener Pflege und Beruf kombinieren. Es stellt sich die Frage, wie Erwerbs- und Pflegetätigkeit besser miteinander vereinbart werden können. Denn der Bedarf an (informeller) Pflege wird infolge des demografischen Wandels weiter steigen. Der vorliegende Bericht zeigt, dass informell Pflegende allgemein und mit der sozialen Sicherung weniger zufrieden sind als Personen, die keine Pflege leisten. Allerdings geben die Daten an dieser Stelle keinen Hinweis darauf, dass eine gleichzeitige Erwerbstätigkeit diesen Effekt verstärkt.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Geyer & Erika Schulz, 2014. "Who cares? Die Bedeutung der informellen Pflege durch Erwerbstätige in Deutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(14), pages 294-301.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:81-14-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.441657.de/14-14-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Geyer & Thorben Korfhage, 2018. "Labor supply effects of long‐term care reform in Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(9), pages 1328-1339, September.
    2. Geyer, Johannes & Korfhage, Thorben, 2015. "Long-term care reform and the labor supply of household members: Evidence from a quasi-experiment," Ruhr Economic Papers 574, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Zwar, Larissa & König, Hans-Helmut & Hajek, André, 2020. "Psychosocial consequences of transitioning into informal caregiving in male and female caregivers: Findings from a population-based panel study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Lea de Jong & Torben Schmidt & Jona Theodor Stahmeyer & Sveja Eberhard & Jan Zeidler & Kathrin Damm, 2023. "Willingness to provide informal care to older adults in Germany: a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(3), pages 425-436, April.
    5. Johannes Geyer & Peter Haan & Thorben Korfhage, 2015. "Indirect Fiscal Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1520, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Diego Montano & Richard Peter, 2022. "Informal care-giving and the intention to give up employment: the role of perceived supervisor behaviour in a cohort of German employees," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 575-585, September.
    7. Fischer, Björn & Müller, Kai-Uwe, 2020. "Time to care? The effects of retirement on informal care provision," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Fischer, Björn & Haan, Peter & Sanchez, Santiago Salazar, 2022. "The effect of unemployment on care provision," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    9. Hohmeyer, Katrin & Kopf, Eva, 2015. "Pflegende in Arbeitslosengeld-II-Haushalten: Wie Leistungsbezieher Pflege und Arbeitsuche vereinbaren (Welfare benefit recipients providing long-term care for their relatives : How they reconcile job ," IAB-Kurzbericht 201505, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    10. Berger, Johannes & Graf, Nikolaus & Strohner, Ludwig & Thomas, Tobias, 2018. "Pflegefinanzierung in Österreich: Nachhaltigkeit und Reformoptionen," Policy Notes 25, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Geyer, J.; Korfhage, T.;, 2017. "Long-term care reform and the labor supply of informal caregivers – evidence from a quasi-experiment," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/20, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    12. Ivo Bischoff & Nataliya Kusa, 2016. "Should there be a more active role of family care assistants in long-term care provision? – survey evidence on the view of German citizens," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201642, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. Hobler, Dietmar & Klenner, Christina & Pfahl, Svenja & Sopp, Peter & Wagner, Alexandra, 2017. "Wer leistet unbezahlte Arbeit? Hausarbeit, Kindererziehung und Pflege im Geschlechtervergleich. Aktuelle Auswertungen aus dem WSI GenderDatenPortal," WSI Reports 35, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    14. Ulrike Ehrlich, 2023. "The Association between Family Care and Paid Work among Women in Germany: Does the Household Economic Context Matter?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(1), pages 117-136, February.
    15. Bönke, Timm & Glaubitz, Rick & Göbler, Konstantin & Harnack, Astrid & Pape, Astrid & Wetter, Miriam, 2020. "Die Entwicklung und Prognose von Lebenserwerbseinkommen in Deutschland," Discussion Papers 2020/5, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    long-term care; labor supply; life-satisfaction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:81-14-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.