IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dah/aeqsjb/v135_y2015_i1_q1_p67-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Workplace Training more Beneficial for Vocationally Educated Workers? A Comparison Between England and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Icardi

Abstract

There is evidence that participation in workplace training has a positive effect on wages; however, it is unknown whether training returns differ across different types of educational attainment. This exploration is relevant because it may indicate a way to redress wage gaps in the labour market. Using the German Socio Economic Panel and the British Household Panel Survey, this paper looks at individuals educated at the secondary level in Germany and England and examines whether workplace training has a positive association with wages for them and, if so, whether the returns vary by their type of education, vocational or general. This study uses a difference-in-differences approach and its combination with propensity score matching to address the problem of training endogeneity. Results indicate that training returns differ across countries and by type of educational attainment; however, any significant ‘effects’ disappear when selection of trainees is taken into account demonstrating the importance of model choice on results found.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Icardi, 2015. "Is Workplace Training more Beneficial for Vocationally Educated Workers? A Comparison Between England and Germany," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 135(1), pages 67-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqsjb:v135_y2015_i1_q1_p67-81
    DOI: 10.3790/schm.135.1.67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.1.67
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/schm.135.1.67?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J41 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Labor Contracts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqsjb:v135_y2015_i1_q1_p67-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: E-Publishing-Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.