IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v23y1991i02p167-174_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Consumer Pesticide Residue Concerns and Risk Information Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Byrne, Patrick J.
  • Gempesaw, Conrado M.
  • Toensmeyer, Ulrich C.

Abstract

Marginal probability effects of demographic variables on consumer concerns about pesticide residues were assessed as well as the likelihood of consumer beliefs given different channels of information on produce safety and risks. This was done using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of ordered logit models. The empirical results showed that pesticide residue concern levels appeared to be lower for more highly educated and high income households. Safety information from the academic community was found to have the highest likelihood of acceptance by consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Byrne, Patrick J. & Gempesaw, Conrado M. & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 1991. "An Evaluation of Consumer Pesticide Residue Concerns and Risk Information Sources," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 167-174, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:23:y:1991:i:02:p:167-174_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200018288/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Magnusson & J. A. L. Cranfield, 2005. "Consumer Demand for Pesticide Free Food Products in Canada: A Probit Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 53(1), pages 67-81, March.
    2. Kreider, Craig Robert & Gempesaw, Conrado M., II & Bacon, J. Richard & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C. & Groff, Andrew J., 1993. "An Analysis Of Consumer Perceptions Of Fresh Fish And Seafood In The Delmarva Region," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 24(2), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Bacon, J. Richard & Groff, Andrew J. & Gempesaw, Conrado M., II & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 1994. "The Market Potential For Farm-Raised Aquaculture Products In The Delmarva Region: A Survey Of Wholesale Distributors," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 25(1), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Teisl, Mario F. & Bockstael, Nancy E. & Levy, Alan S., 1997. "Preferences For Food Labels: A Discrete Choice Approach," Strategy and Policy in the Food System: Emerging Issues, June 20-21, 1996, Washington, D.C. 25955, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    5. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2008:i:15:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Elif Akben & Gökhan Özertan & Aslýhan D. Spaulding & Sayed H. Saghaian, 2008. "Consumer responses to the H5N1 Avian Influenza: the case of Turkey," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(15), pages 1-9.
    7. Piedra, Mario A. & Schupp, Alvin R. & Montgomery, Donna E., 1996. "Consumer Use Of Nutrition Labels On Packaged Meats," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Patrick J. Byrne & J. Richard Bacon & Ulrich C. Toensmeyer, 1994. "Pesticide residue concerns and shopping location likelihood," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(6), pages 491-501.
    9. Roosen, Jutta & Fox, John A. & Hennessy, David A. & Schreiber, Alan, 1998. "Consumers' Valuation Of Insecticide Use Restrictions: An Application To Apples," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Baker, Gregory A. & Burnham, Thomas A., 2001. "Consumer Response To Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis And Implications For Producers And Policy Makers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Bockstael, Nancy E. & Just, Richard E. & Teisl, Mario F., 1994. "Food Inspection and Safety: An Overview," Re-Engineering Marketing Policies for Food and Agriculture - FAMC 1994 Conference 265974, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:23:y:1991:i:02:p:167-174_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.