IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v63y2009i04p701-731_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrichs, Jörg
  • Kratochwil, Friedrich

Abstract

This article moves from deconstruction to reconstruction in research methodology. It proposes pragmatism as a way to escape from epistemological deadlock. We first show that social scientists are mistaken in their hope to obtain warranted knowledge through traditional scientific methods. We then show that pragmatism has grown from tacit commonsense to an explicit item on the agenda of the international relations discipline. We suggest that a coherent pragmatic approach consists of two elements: the recognition of knowledge generation as a social and discursive activity, and the orientation of research toward the generation of useful knowledge. To offer a concrete example of what pragmatic methodology can look like, we propose the research strategy of abduction. We assess various forms of research design to further elucidate how pragmatic research works in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrichs, Jörg & Kratochwil, Friedrich, 2009. "On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 701-731, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:63:y:2009:i:04:p:701-731_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818309990142/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Monika Sus, 2017. "Towards the European Union's Foreign Policy 2025 – Taking Stock of the Dahrendorf Foresight Project," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s4), pages 115-125, June.
    2. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    3. José R Ponce, 2018. "Origin and Evolution of the Concept Stress," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 10(5), pages 8130-8135, November.
    4. Juliet Johnson & Daniel M�gge & Leonard Seabrooke & Cornelia Woll & Ilene Grabel & Kevin P. Gallagher, 2013. "The future of international political economy: Introduction to the 20th anniversary issue of RIPE," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 1009-1023, October.
    5. Hofferberth Matthias, 2011. "The Binding Dynamics of Non-Binding Governance Arrangements. The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights and the Cases of BP and Chevron," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, December.
    6. Odell, Scott D., 2021. "Hydrosocial displacements: Sources and impacts of collaboration as a response to water conflict near three Chilean mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Raelin, Joseph A. & Robinson, Jennifer L., 2022. "Update of leadership-as-practice “practice theory”: Featuring Joe Raelin Interviewed by Jenny Robinson," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(5), pages 695-706.
    8. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:115-125 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Juliet Johnson & Daniel Mügge & Leonard Seabrooke & Cornelia Woll & Ilene Grabel & Kevin Gallagher, 2013. "The future of international political economy," Post-Print hal-02186506, HAL.
    10. Sanchez, Juan I. & Bonache, Jaime & Paz-Aparicio, Carmen & Oberty, Celia Zárraga, 2023. "Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    11. Lederer, Markus, 2011. "Practicing agrifood governance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 756-759.
    12. Jyri J. Jäntti & Benjamin Klasche, 2021. "‘Losing Leverage’ in the Neighbourhood: A Cognitive Frame Analysis of the European Union Migration Policy," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 302-323, July.
    13. Niels Gheyle, 2020. "Huddle Up! Exploring Domestic Coalition Formation Dynamics in the Differentiated Politicization of TTIP," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 301-311.
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9oeq948ubh is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Jon R Lindsay, 2024. "Abducted by hackers: Using the case of Bletchley Park to construct a theory of intelligence performance that generalizes to cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 87-102, January.
    16. Pablo Garcés, 2022. "Pragmatic behaviour: pragmatism as a philosophy for behavioural economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34.
    17. Jonathan D. Caverley & Yanna Krupnikov, 2017. "Aiming at Doves," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(7), pages 1482-1509, August.
    18. Kurusu, Kaoru, 2016. "Does the Concept of Human Security Generate Additional Value? An Analysis of Japanese Stakeholder Perceptions," Working Papers 122, JICA Research Institute.
    19. Marlin-Bennett, Renée & Thornton, E. Nicole, 2012. "Governance within social media websites: Ruling new frontiers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 493-501.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:63:y:2009:i:04:p:701-731_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.