IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v4y2011i01p83-97_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-Centric Work Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Weiss, Howard M.
  • Rupp, Deborah E.

Abstract

In this essay we argue for a more person-centric direction for research in industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology. We argue that the prevailing paradigm within I–O treats workers as objects and in so doing limits the ability to develop a deep and continued understanding of the important ways in which humans relate to work. In response, we think there is a need for a more coherent focus on the worker and on the subjective experience of working. After describing the current paradigm we suggest an alternative—a person-centric work psychology that takes the worker as its focus and worker experience as a topic of study.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiss, Howard M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2011. "Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-Centric Work Psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 83-97, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:4:y:2011:i:01:p:83-97_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600003990/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Hong & Guan, Yanjun & Wu, Chia-Huei & Erdogan, Berrin & Bauer, Talya & Yao, Xiang, 2018. "A relational model of perceived overqualification: the moderating role of interpersonal influence on social acceptance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67547, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. José María Rentería & Dante Solano, 2022. "Does teacher subjective well-being influence students' learning achievement? Evidence from public basic education in Peru," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22012, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Oliver Weigelt & Antje Schmitt & Christine J. Syrek & Sandra Ohly, 2021. "Exploring the Engaged Worker over Time—A Week-Level Study of How Positive and Negative Work Events Affect Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Cojuharenco, Irina & Patient, David & Bashshur, Michael R., 2011. "Seeing the "forest" or the "trees" of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 17-31, September.
    5. Byung‐Jik Kim & Youngkyun Chang & Tae‐Hyun Kim, 2023. "Translating corporate social responsibility into financial performance: Exploring roles of work engagement and strategic coherence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2555-2573, September.
    6. Sendlhofer, Tina & Tolstoy, Daniel, 2022. "How employees shape CSR transparency: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 268-278.
    7. Muafi & Olivia Fachrunnisa & Yuni Siswanti & Zainal Mustofa Qadri & Dwipraptono Agus Harjito, 2019. "Empowering Leadership and Individual Readiness to Change: the Role of People Dimension and Work Method," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1515-1535, December.
    8. José María Renteíra & Dante Solano, 2022. "Does teacher subjective well-being influence students' learning achievement? Evidence from public basic education in Peru," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03688119, HAL.
    9. Rupp, Deborah E. & Shao, Ruodan & Jones, Kisha S. & Liao, Hui, 2014. "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and socia," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 159-185.
    10. Martikainen, Suvi Jonna & Kudrna, Laura & Dolan, Paul, 2022. "Moments of meaningfulness and meaninglessness: a qualitative inquiry into affective eudaimonia at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113970, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Jun Song & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu & Shuo Xu, 2019. "Differential promotive voice–prohibitive voice relationships with employee performance: Power distance orientation as a moderator," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1053-1077, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:4:y:2011:i:01:p:83-97_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.