IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v123y2014i2p159-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Rupp, Deborah E.
  • Shao, Ruodan
  • Jones, Kisha S.
  • Liao, Hui

Abstract

Multifoci justice pulls from research on social exchange theory to argue that despite the proliferation of rule sets in the literature (often referred to as the “types” of justice), individuals seek to hold some party accountable for the violation/upholding of such rules, and it is these parties (e.g., supervisors, the organization as a whole) that are most likely to be the recipients of attitudes and behaviors (i.e., target similarity effects). To explore these issues, we meta-analytically (k=647, N=235,682) compared the predictive validities of source- vs. type-based justice perceptions and found that (a) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted outcomes directed at matched sources than did type-based justice perceptions, (b) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted target similar than dissimilar outcomes, and (c) the relationships between multifoci justice perceptions and target similar outcomes were mediated by source-specific social exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Rupp, Deborah E. & Shao, Ruodan & Jones, Kisha S. & Liao, Hui, 2014. "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and socia," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 159-185.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:159-185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597813000940
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Cremer, David & Mayer, David M. & Schminke, Marshall, 2010. "Guest Editors’ Introduction: On Understanding Ethical Behavior and Decision Making: A Behavioral Ethics Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Greg Loviscky & Linda Treviño & Rick Jacobs, 2007. "Assessing Managers’ Ethical Decision-making: An Objective Measure of Managerial Moral Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 263-285, July.
    3. Olkkonen, Maria-Elena & Lipponen, Jukka, 2006. "Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 202-215, July.
    4. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    5. Price, Kenneth H. & Lavelle, James J. & Henley, Amy B. & Cocchiara, Faye K. & Buchanan, F. Robert, 2006. "Judging the fairness of voice-based participation across multiple and interrelated stages of decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 212-226, March.
    6. Greenberg, Jerald, 2009. "Everybody Talks About Organizational Justice, But Nobody Does Anything About It," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 181-195, June.
    7. Rupp, Deborah E. & Aquino, Karl F., 2009. "Nothing So Practical as a Good Justice Theory," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 205-210, June.
    8. Weiss, Howard M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2011. "Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-Centric Work Psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 83-97, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.
    2. Will Bryant & Stephanie M. Merritt, 2021. "Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior and Positive Leader–Employee Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 777-793, February.
    3. Meghan A. Thornton & Deborah E. Rupp, 2016. "The Joint Effects of Justice Climate, Group Moral Identity, and Corporate Social Responsibility on the Prosocial and Deviant Behaviors of Groups," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 677-697, September.
    4. Peltokorpi, Vesa & Sekiguchi, Tomoki & Yamao, Sachiko, 2021. "Expatriate justice and host country nationals' work outcomes: Does host country nationals' language proficiency matter?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    5. Tremblay, Michel & Simard, Gilles, 2018. "A multifoci approach to study social support and job performance: A target similarity consideration of development-enhancing practices, leadership, and structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 118-130.
    6. Sabeen Hussain Bhatti & Kamran Iqbal & Gabriele Santoro & Fabio Rizzato, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility directed toward employees on contextual performance in the banking sector: A serial model of perceived organizational support and affective organizational," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1980-1994, November.
    7. Laurie J. Barclay & Maria Francisca Saldanha, 2016. "Facilitating Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts: Exploring the Injustice Gap, Emotions, and Expressive Writing Interventions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 699-720, September.
    8. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin, 2022. "How Should We Distribute Rewards in Social Sustainable Organizations? Investigating Individual Preferences for Justice Allocation Norms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Clotilde Coron, 2021. "How perceived managerial behaviors influence employees’ perception of gender equality: the case of a French organization [L’influence des comportements managériaux perçus sur la perception de l’éga," Post-Print halshs-02879960, HAL.
    10. Osama A. Hazzi & Samir M. Hammami, 2019. "Exploratory Factor Analysis of Technological Justice: An Evidence From the Higher Education Sector in Oman," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    11. Leineweber, Constanze & Peristera, Paraskevi & Bernhard-Oettel, Claudia & Eib, Constanze, 2020. "Is interpersonal justice related to group and organizational turnover? Results from a Swedish panel study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    12. Jung, Jin Ho & Brown, Tom J. & Zablah, Alex R., 2017. "The effect of customer-initiated justice on customer-oriented behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 38-46.
    13. Amira Daouk & Panteha Farmanesh & Pouya Zargar, 2021. "The Relationship Between Transactional Leadership and OCB: A Conditional Analysis of Organizational Justice Perception and Psychological Contract Fulfillment," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    14. David B. Whiteside & Laurie J. Barclay, 2016. "The Face of Fairness: Self-Awareness as a Means to Promote Fairness among Managers with Low Empathy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 721-730, September.
    15. Bacile, Todd J. & Wolter, Jeremy S. & Allen, Alexis M. & Xu, Pei, 2018. "The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers During Social Media Service Recovery," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 60-81.
    16. Gaudet, Marie-Claude & Tremblay, Michel, 2017. "Initiating structure leadership and employee behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and leader–member exchange," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 663-675.
    17. Blunden, Hayley & Steffel, Mary, 2023. "The downside of decision delegation: When transferring decision responsibility incurs interpersonal costs," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    19. Haesang Park & Jenny M. Hoobler & Junfeng Wu & Robert C. Liden & Jia Hu & Morgan S. Wilson, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1113-1131, September.
    20. Kaynak, Ramazan & Sert, Tuba & Sert, Gurkan & Akyuz, Bulent, 2015. "Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 83-91.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lalit Kumar Yadav & Pawan Gupta, 2017. "Procedural Justice, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Mediating Role of Organizational Trust—Indian Tourism Industry Study," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(3), pages 275-292, August.
    2. Hang-yue Ngo & Raymond Loi & Sharon Foley & Xiaoming Zheng & Lingqing Zhang, 2013. "Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 149-168, March.
    3. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu, 2020. "The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 495-512, December.
    4. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin, 2014. "One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 435-451, October.
    5. Raphael M. Herr & Jian Li & Peter Angerer, 2019. "The Synergistic Effects of Organizational Justice and Trust to Supervisor on Vagal Tone: Preliminary Findings of an Empirical Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Hilal BARAN & Ceren GİDERLER, 2017. "A Study on Determining the Influence of Organizational Identification on Organizational Justice and Organizational Silence," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(3), pages 242-258, March.
    7. Patel, Charmi & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup, 2012. "Overall justice, work group identification and work outcomes: Test of moderated mediation process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-222.
    8. Yan Liu & Christopher Berry, 2013. "Identity, Moral, and Equity Perspectives on the Relationship Between Experienced Injustice and Time Theft," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 73-83, November.
    9. Nicklin, Jessica M. & Greenbaum, Rebecca & McNall, Laurel A. & Folger, Robert & Williams, Kevin J., 2011. "The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 127-141, March.
    10. Mariam Farooq & Omer Farooq & Walid Cheffi, 2019. "How Do Employees Respond to the CSR Initiatives of their Organizations: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Cojuharenco, Irina & Patient, David & Bashshur, Michael R., 2011. "Seeing the "forest" or the "trees" of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 17-31, September.
    12. Serhat Erat & Hakan Kitapçı & Kültigin Akçin, 2020. "Managerial Perception and Organizational Identity: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Hongwei He & Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng, 2014. "Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-695, July.
    14. Carmon, Anna F. & Miller, Amy N. & Raile, Amber N.W. & Roers, Michelle M., 2010. "Fusing family and firm: Employee perceptions of perceived homophily, organizational justice, organizational identification, and organizational commitment in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 210-223, December.
    15. Kerwin, Shannon & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Turner, Brian A., 2015. "Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 384-395.
    16. Sangeeta Sahu & Avinash D. Pathardikar, 2014. "Job Cognition and Justice Influencing Organizational Attachment," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    17. van Dijke, Marius & De Cremer, David & Mayer, David M. & Van Quaquebeke, Niels, 2012. "When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 235-248.
    18. Chenot, David & Boutakidis, Ioakim & Benton, Amy D., 2014. "Equity and fairness perceptions in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 400-406.
    19. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    20. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:159-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.