IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/020626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caracterización y sostenibilidad del emprendimiento social rural en agronegocios asociativos del sur de Narino

Author

Listed:
  • González, Lizeth Johanna Villota

    (Universidad de Nariño)

Abstract

El presente estudio permite documentar y comprender el manejo de los emprendimientos sociales a través del agronegocio en grupos asociativos rurales. Aspectos como la caracterización, la dinámica de funcionamiento e innovación y el modelo de sostenibilidad de este tipo de emprendimientos, se analizan cualitativamente. La investigación se realizó en el sur de Narino -Colombia, fue abordada bajo un enfoque histórico hermenéutico y de orden descriptivo interpretativo con un muestreo intencional. Las asociaciones, se seleccionaron a partir de los objetivos y misión social, trayectoria y modelo de agronegocio. La información recolectada se abordó empleando un análisis temático para interpretar los datos recolectados. Por tanto, se identificaron las características y el impacto de estos grupos en la comunidad y región, el funcionamiento del agronegocio como eje de innovación del objetivo social y la sostenibilidad del emprendimiento que surge de las realidades de las poblaciones en su transitar por este proceso. Con este trabajo de investigación se concluye que el estudiar un emprendimiento social desde la asociatividad permite identificar oportunidades y darles valor social y económico por medio de proyectos de desarrollo local, los cuales se fortalecen con la labor integral del agronegocio, promoviendo la innovación y la sostenibilidad. ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* The present study allows to document and understand the management of social enterprises through agribusiness in rural associative groups. Aspects such as the characterization, the dynamics of operation and innovation, and the sustainability model of this type of venture are analyzed qualitatively. The research was carried out in the south of Narino -Colombia, it was approached under a hermeneutic historical approach and of an interpretive descriptive order with an intentional sampling. The associations were selected based on the objectives and social mission, trajectory and agribusiness model. The information collected was approached using a thematic analysis to interpret the data collected. Therefore, the characteristics and impact of these groups in the community and region, the operation of agribusiness as an axis of innovation of the social objective and the sustainability of the venture that arises from the realities of the populations in their transit through this process were identified. With this research work it is concluded that studying a social enterprise from the associativity allows to identify opportunities and give them social and economic value through local development projects, which are strengthened with the integral work of agribusiness,promoting innovation and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • González, Lizeth Johanna Villota, 2023. "Caracterización y sostenibilidad del emprendimiento social rural en agronegocios asociativos del sur de Narino," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 24(1), pages 50-78, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:020626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/7897
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Punita Bhatt Datta & Robert Gailey, 2012. "Empowering Women through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(3), pages 569-587, May.
    2. Björn C. Mitzinneck & Marya L. Besharov, 2019. "Managing Value Tensions in Collective Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Temporal, Structural, and Collaborative Compromise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 381-400, October.
    3. Figueiredo, Vítor & Franco, Mário, 2018. "Wine cooperatives as a form of social entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence about their impact on society," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 812-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankita Tandon & Unnikrishnan K. Nair, 2015. "Enactment of knowledge brokering: Agents, roles, processes and the impact of immersion," Working papers 183, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    2. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    4. Thilde Langevang & Katherine V. Gough & Paul W. K. Yankson & George Owusu & Robert Osei, 2015. "Bounded Entrepreneurial Vitality: The Mixed Embeddedness of Female Entrepreneurship," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(4), pages 449-473, October.
    5. Maria Bastida & Ana Olveira & Miguel Ángel Vázquez Taín, 2023. "Are cooperatives gender sensitive? A confirmatory and predictive analysis of women's collective entrepreneurship," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1035-1059, December.
    6. Régis Y. Chenavaz & Alexandra Couston & Stéphanie Heichelbech & Isabelle Pignatel & Stanko Dimitrov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    7. repec:kqi:journl:2018-2-2-1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Elvis Dze Achuo & Simplice A. Asongu & Vanessa S. Tchamyou, 2022. "Women empowerment and environmental sustainability in Africa," Working Papers of The Association for Promoting Women in Research and Development in Africa (ASPROWORDA). 22/003, The Association for Promoting Women in Research and Development in Africa (ASPROWORDA).
    9. Kouam, Jean & Asongu, Simplice, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 114061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rosca, Eugenia & Agarwal, Nivedita & Brem, Alexander, 2020. "Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Ritesh Shahi & Nadiya Parekh, 2022. "Financing Social Enterprises: An Upper Echelon Perspective," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 235-250, June.
    12. Gras, David & Nason, Robert S., 2015. "Bric by bric: The role of the family household in sustaining a venture in impoverished Indian slums," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 546-563.
    13. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4068-4083, November.
    14. Sanghita Bhattacharjee & Bhaskar Goswami, 2020. "Determinants of Empowerment: An Insight from the Study of the Female Domestic Workers," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 226-238, December.
    15. Brett R. Smith & Amanda Lawson & Jessica Jones & Tim Holcomb & Aimee Minnich, 2022. "Trying to Serve Two Masters is Easy, Compared to Three: Identity Multiplicity Work by Christian Impact Investors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1053-1070, September.
    16. Zaremohzzabieh, Zeinab & Ahrari, Seyedali & Krauss, Steven Eric & Samah, Asnarulkhadi Abu & Meng, Lee Kwan & Ariffin, Zaifunizam, 2019. "Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 264-276.
    17. Celestine Katongole & John C. Munene & Muhammed Ngoma & Samuel Dawa & Arthur Sserwanga, 2015. "Entrepreneur’s Intrapersonal Resources and Enterprise Success among Micro and Small Scale Women Entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 405-447, December.
    18. Vincent Onyemah & Martha Rivera Pesquera, 2015. "Cognitive Ambidexterity In Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Four Country Exploratory Study Of Women Entrepreneurs’ Early Customer Acquisition Strategies," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 6(1).
    19. Sébastien Gand & Mathias Béjean, 2013. "Organizing sustainable democratic firms: processes of regeneration as the design of new models of cooperation," Post-Print hal-00881721, HAL.
    20. EuiBeom Jeong & Hanna Yoo, 2022. "A systematic literature review of women in social entrepreneurship," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 935-970, December.
    21. Gerard George & Ryan K. Merrill & Simon J. D. Schillebeeckx, 2021. "Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 999-1027, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    empresa agrícola; comportamiento innovador; cooperativa agrícola; cooperación económica; desarrollo sostenible;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • J54 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Producer Cooperatives; Labor Managed Firms
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:020626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.