IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/019389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aplicación del modelo de ajuste parcial nerloviano para estimar la elasticidad de la oferta de plátano en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Cancino, Susan

    (Universidad de Pamplona)

  • Escalante, Giovanni Orlando Cancino

    (Universidad de Pamplona)

Abstract

El objetivo del presente estudio fue estimar la respuesta de la oferta del plátano y las elasticidades de corto y largo plazo mediante el modelo de ajuste parcial desarrollado por Nerlove, tomando como base el periodo entre 2000 y 2018. Se aplicó un diseno de investigación explicativo, cuantitativo y correlacional y para la estimación empírica se empleó la metodología de los vectores autorregresivos. Los resultados indicaron que los coeficientes asociados al precio y producción rezagadas fueron positivos, significativos y coherentes con la teoría económica. Las elasticidades calculadas de corto plazo fueron inelásticas y similares a estudios relacionados con los cultivos permanentes por lo cual se puede inferir que las políticas de precios no son una herramienta eficaz para aumentar la oferta del plátano debido a la baja respuesta de la producción a movimientos en los precios. ***************************************************************************************************************************The objective of this study was to estimate the response of the plantain supply and the short and long-term elasticities through the partial adjustment model developed by Nerlove, based on the period between 2000 and 2018. An explanatory, quantitative and correlational research design was applied and for the empirical estimation, the methodology of autoregressive vectors was used. The results indicated that the coefficients associated with lagged price and production were positive, significant and consistent with economic theory. The short-term elasticities were inelastic and similar to studies related to permanent crops, thus price polices are not an effective tool to increase supply due the low response to price movements. ***************************************************************************************************************************O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a resposta da oferta do plátano e as elasticidades de curto e longo prazo por meio do modelo de ajuste parcial desenvolvido por Nerlove, para o período entre 2000 e 2018. Um desenho de pesquisa explicativo, quantitativo e de correlacao, foi aplicada e para a estimativa empírica, utilizou-se uma metodologia vetorial auto-regresiva. Os resultados indicaram que os coeficientes associados ao preco e a producao defasados foram positivos, significativos e consistentes com a teoria economica. As elasticidades de curto prazo calculadas foram inelásticas e semelhantes a estudos relacionados com culturas permanentes, pelo que se pode inferir que as políticas de precos nao sao um instrumento eficaz para aumentar a oferta do plátano devido a baixa resposta da producao aos movimentos nos precos.

Suggested Citation

  • Cancino, Susan & Escalante, Giovanni Orlando Cancino, 2021. "Aplicación del modelo de ajuste parcial nerloviano para estimar la elasticidad de la oferta de plátano en Colombia," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 22(2), pages 57-75, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:019389
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.212202.168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.212202.168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.212202.168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helmut Lütkepohl, 2005. "New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-27752-1, December.
    2. Haile, Mekbib G. & Kalkuhl, Matthias, 2013. "Agricultural supply response to international food prices and price volatility: a crosscountry panel analysis," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149630, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Marc Nerlove, 1958. "Distributed lags and Estimation of Long-Run Supply and Demand Elasticities: Theoretical Considerations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 301-310.
    4. Askari, Hossein & Cummings, John Thomas, 1977. "Estimating Agricultural Supply Response with the Nerlove Model: A Survey," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 257-292, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donato, Romano & Carraro, Alessandro, 2015. "Modelling Acreage, Production and Yield Supply Response to Domestic Price Volatility," 2015 Fourth Congress, June 11-12, 2015, Ancona, Italy 207278, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    2. Cui, Xiaomeng, 2020. "Climate change and adaptation in agriculture: Evidence from US cropping patterns," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Jean-Claude Nascimento & Marc Raffinot, 1985. "Politique de prix agricoles et comportement des producteurs : le cas de l'arachide au Sénégal," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(4), pages 779-796.
    4. Mubarik Ali, 1990. "The Price Response of Major Crops in Pakistan: An Application of the Simultaneous Equation Model," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 29(3 and 4), pages 305-325.
    5. Antony, Nyerere, 2016. "Determinants Of Rice Supply In Tanzania," Research Theses 276426, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Meilke, Karl D. & Weersink, Alfons, 1991. "An Analysis of the Effects of Government Payments to Grain and Oilseeds Producers on Cropping Decisions," Working Papers 244081, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    7. Shengying Zhai & Qihui Chen & Wenxin Wang, 2019. "What Drives Green Fodder Supply in China?—A Nerlovian Analysis with LASSO Variable Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Liu, Karen, 1981. "Multiple Crop Supply and Factor Demand Component of the World Grains, Oilseeds, and Livestock Model," Staff Reports 276718, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Gerardo Manzo & Antonio Picca, 2020. "The Impact of Sovereign Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3113-3132, July.
    10. Jean-Paul Chavas & Matthew T. Holt, 1990. "Acreage Decisions Under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(3), pages 529-538.
    11. António Afonso & Yasfir Ibraimo, 2020. "The macroeconomic effects of public debt: an empirical analysis of Mozambique," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 212-226, January.
    12. Burton, Diana M. & Love, H. Alan, 1996. "A Review of Alternative Expectations Regimes in Commodity Markets: Specification, Estimation, and Hypothesis Testing Using Structural Models," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 213-231, October.
    13. Ignacio Lozano Espitia & Karen Rodríguez, 2009. "Assessing the Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal," Borradores de Economia 5386, Banco de la Republica.
    14. Sunil S. Poshakwale & Pankaj Chandorkar, 2019. "The Impact of Aggregate and Disaggregate Consumption Shocks on the Equity Risk Premium in the United Kingdom," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 20(2), pages 489-524, November.
    15. Thibault Fally & James Sayre, 2018. "Commodity Trade Matters," 2018 Meeting Papers 172, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Wang, Yuanyuan & Chi, Yuanying & Xu, Jin-Hua & Yuan, Yongke, 2022. "Consumers’ attitudes and their effects on electric vehicle sales and charging infrastructure construction: An empirical study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Čermák, Michal & Ligocká, Marie, 2022. "Could Exist a Causality Between the Most Traded Commodities and Futures Commodity Prices in the Agricultural Market?," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    18. Harald Schmidbauer & Angi Roesch & Erhan Uluceviz, 2013. "Market Connectedness: Spillovers, Information Flow, and Relative Market Entropy," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1320, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
    19. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Cubadda, Gianluca & Hecq, Alain & Palm, Franz C., 2009. "Studying co-movements in large multivariate data prior to multivariate modelling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 25-35, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cointegración; estacionariedad; expectativas de precios; respuesta oferta; vector autorregresivo;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q11 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:019389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.