IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i3p152-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tangible and Intangible Boundaries: The Case of Baoshan Port-City Interface in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Yueyue Zhang

    (Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

  • Peter Martin Ache

    (Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Instead of stressing that port cities are characterised by institutional fragmentations with many resulting conflicts, we claim that port cities might be highly constructive in terms of changing tangible and intangible boundaries. To capture this quality, we use the concept of ‘penumbral,’ a combination of perceptional aspects as well as tangible and intangible spatial constellations. This perspective is applied in the case of the Shanghai Baoshan port-city interface through the investigation of the changing tangible and intangible boundaries, and how planning relates to boundary changes in a context of spatial, industrial, and institutional multi-layered structures. Tangible refers to physical boundaries between the port and urban structure or district, while intangible refers to immaterial boundaries created by actors’ views on ports. Based on planning documents, direct observations, and 17 in-depth semi-structured interviews with local governments, port authority, planning departments, and companies, we find that one can indeed speak of penumbral boundaries, based on port-related values and ideas, and particularly on perceptions of the port and port businesses. Those perceptions are the initial power of changing and, following the idea of penumbral boundaries, blurring tangible and intangible boundaries. Finally, we suggest that, following the idea of penumbral boundaries, planning can play a stronger role in connecting the port and the city by first investigating how actors view the port and port businesses carefully, paying full attention to the specific relational context before formulating plans in the usual manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueyue Zhang & Peter Martin Ache, 2021. "Tangible and Intangible Boundaries: The Case of Baoshan Port-City Interface in Shanghai," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 152-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:152-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Wang * & Brian Slack, 2004. "Regional governance of port development in China: a case study of Shanghai International Shipping Center," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 357-373, October.
    2. Wang, Haizhuang, 2014. "Preliminary investigation of waterfront redevelopment in Chinese coastal port cities: the case of the eastern Dalian port areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 29-42.
    3. Markus Hesse, 2018. "Approaching the Relational Nature of the Port‐City Interface in Europe: Ties and Tensions Between Seaports and the Urban," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 210-223, April.
    4. Carola Hein, 2016. "Port cityscapes: conference and research contributions on port cities," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 313-326, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark & Seter, Hanne, 2021. "Policy and politics in energy transitions. A case study on shore power in Oslo," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    3. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    4. Wei Li & Bao-Jie He & Jinda Qi & Jianwen Dong, 2018. "Water Conservation Scenic Spots in China: Developing the Tourism Potential of Hydraulic Projects and Water Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Wang, Yuhong & Cullinane, Kevin, 2014. "Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 152-163.
    6. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Zeyang Li & Weixin Luan & Zhenchao Zhang & Min Su, 2023. "Research on the Interactive Relationship of Spatial Expansion between Estuarine and Coastal Port Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun & Martin-Mallofre, Agustí, 2020. "Visualization of container throughput evolution of the Yangtze River Delta multi-port system: the ternary diagram method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Carola Hein, 2021. "Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9.
    11. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2013. "Regional Resilience and Spatial Cycles: Long-Term Evolution of the Chinese Port System (221bc–2010ad)," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(5), pages 521-538, December.
    12. Chenming Jiang & Linjun Lu & Jian John Lu, 2017. "Socioeconomic factors affecting the job satisfaction levels of self-employed container truck drivers: a case study from Shanghai Port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 641-656, July.
    13. Annabelle Duval & Jean-Baptiste Bahers, 2023. "Flows as Makers and Breakers of Port-Territory Metabolic Relations: The Case of the Loire Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 319-329.
    14. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.
    15. Bahana Wiradanti & Stephen Pettit & Andrew Potter & Wessam Abouarghoub, 2020. "Willingness to invest in peripheral ports: perceptions of Indonesian port and maritime industry stakeholders," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 699-714, December.
    16. Y. H. Venus Lun & Kee‐Hung Lai & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2008. "A Descriptive Framework for the Development and Operation of Liner Shipping Networks," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, August.
    17. Shi, Xin & Wang, Ying & Zhuang, Hui & Li, Huan & Jiang, Haizhou & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Global hierarchy of maritime clusters: Stability and reconstruction," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Wan, Zheng & Zhang, Yang & Wang, Xuefeng & Chen, Jihong, 2014. "Policy and politics behind Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone Program," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-6.
    19. Horace Yeung, 2015. "A tale of two cities -- the development and reform experiences of Shenzhen and Shanghai," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 369-396, November.
    20. Pérez, Ivone & González, María Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2020. "Do specialisation and port size affect port efficiency? Evidence from cargo handling service in Spanish ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 234-249.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:152-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.