IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v3y2015i2p117-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU “Mobility” Partnerships: An Initial Assessment of Implementation Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Natasja Reslow

    (Department of International and European Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Cooperation with non-EU countries is a central migration policy priority for the EU, and since 2008 eight Mobility Partnerships have been signed. Given the importance attached to this policy area, it is essential that policy-makers understand how EU external migration policy works in practice. However, the literature on the implementation of EU external migration policy is very limited. This article addresses this deficit, by conducting a conceptual assessment of implementation dynamics in the Mobility Partnerships. At this stage in the implementation process, it is not yet possible to assess whether the Mobility Partnerships have contributed to mobility, which is their stated aim. Instead, the literature on implementation is applied in a “backward” fashion, starting with the implementation dynamics at play. The article concludes that standard analytical frameworks for assessing implementation processes will need to be adapted for “new” policy tools featuring elements of flexibility or voluntary participation, in order to accurately capture implementation processes. Future research should adopt a critical, human rights-centred approach to the issue of implementation of EU external migration policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasja Reslow, 2015. "EU “Mobility” Partnerships: An Initial Assessment of Implementation Dynamics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 117-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:117-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/398
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert T. Nakamura, 1987. "The Textbook Policy Process And Implementation Research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 7(1), pages 142-154, September.
    2. Sabatier, Paul A., 1986. "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 21-48, January.
    3. Miriam Hartlapp, 2007. "On Enforcement, Management and Persuasion: Different Logics of Implementation Policy in the EU and the ILO," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 653-674, September.
    4. Peter DeLeon, 1999. "The Missing Link Revisited:," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 16(3‐4), pages 311-338, September.
    5. Miriam Hartlapp, 2007. "On Enforcement, Management and Persuasion: Different Logics of Implementation Policy in the EU and the ILO," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45, pages 653-674, September.
    6. Jon Skjærseth & Jørgen Wettestad, 2008. "Implementing EU emissions trading: success or failure?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 275-290, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Claude Barbier & Fabrice Colomb, 2011. "The unbearable foreignness of EU law in social policy, a sociological approach to law-making," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00639906, HAL.
    2. Jean-Claude Barbier & Fabrice Colomb, 2011. "The unbearable foreignness of EU law in social policy, a sociological approach to law-making," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11065, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Jean-Claude Barbier & Fabrice Colomb, 2011. "The unbearable foreignness of EU law in social policy, a sociological approach to law-making," Post-Print halshs-00639906, HAL.
    4. Keonhi SON, 2023. "Do international treaties have an impact only on ratifying States? The influence of the ILO Maternity Protection Conventions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(2), pages 245-269, June.
    5. Christoph Knill & Louisa Bayerlein & Jan Enkler & Stephan Grohs, 2019. "Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 83-106, March.
    6. Jean-Claude, Barbier and Fabrice Colomb, 2012. "EU Law as Janus bifrons, a sociological approach to 'Social Europe'," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.
    7. Benassi, Chiara., 2011. "The implementation of minimum wage : challenges and creative solutions," ILO Working Papers 994629883402676, International Labour Organization.
    8. Jean-Claude Barbier & Fabrice Colomb, 2015. "The Janus face of EU law: A sociological perspective on European law making and its influence on social policy in the EU," Chapters, in: Jean-Claude Barbier & Ralf Rogowski & Fabrice Colomb (ed.), The Sustainability of the European Social Model, chapter 1, pages 19-43, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Wolniewicz-Slomka, Klaudia, 2022. "Projektowanie i implementacja polityki publicznej - przegląd podejść teoretycznych," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Lars Carlsson, 1996. "Nonhierarchical Implementation Analysis," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 8(4), pages 527-546, October.
    11. repec:ilo:ilowps:462988 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ruud van Druenen & Pieter Zwaan & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2022. "Getting State Aid Approved by the European Commission: Explaining the Duration of Preliminary Investigations in the State Aid Notification Procedure," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 545-561, May.
    13. Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. & Fisher, Micah R. & Erbaugh, J.T. & Intarini, Dian & Dharmiasih, Wiwik & Makmur, Muliadi & Faturachmat, Fatwa & Verheijen, Bart & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Maritta Soininen, 2014. "The Problem of Mismatch in Successful Cross-Sectoral Collaboration," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 43-56.
    15. Sonja Priebus, 2022. "The Commission's Approach to Rule of Law Backsliding: Managing Instead of Enforcing Democratic Values?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1684-1700, November.
    16. Jean-Claude Barbier & Fabrice Colomb, 2014. "The Janus faces of European policy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 23-36, February.
    17. Tanja A. Börzel & Tobias Hofmann & Diana Panke, 2011. "Policy Matters But How? Explaining Non-Compliance Dynamics in the EU," KFG Working Papers p0024, Free University Berlin.
    18. Olivia Golden, 1990. "Innovation in public sector human services programs: The implications of innovation by “groping along”," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 219-248.
    19. Ogada, Maurice Juma, 2012. "Forest Management Decentralization in Kenya: Effects on Household Farm Forestry Decisions in Kakamega," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126319, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Wang, Hsiao-Fan & Sung, Meng-Ping & Hsu, Hsin-Wei, 2016. "Complementarity and substitution of renewable energy in target year energy supply-mix plannin–in the case of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 172-182.
    21. E R Alexander & A Faludi, 1989. "Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(2), pages 127-140, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:117-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.