IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v63y2010i02p15-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

he German federal states in business location competition - yesterday, today and tomorrow

Author

Listed:
  • Norbert Berthold
  • Nadya Kosturkova
  • Andreas Müller

Abstract

Norbert Berthold, Nadya Kosturkova and Andreas Müller, University of Würzburg, evaluate the success and activities of the German federal states in business location competition for the period 2006 to 2008. The study measures the success of the individual states by means of six variables. These are combined to form a success index that indicates how successful the states were relative to each other. In addition, factors that the states influence that have a significant effect on the six variables are identified. These factors explain to a great extent the varying performance of the federal states. As with the success index, the activity levels are combined to form an activity index that allows for a direct comparison of the efforts of the states relative to each other. This article gives information on how the states have performed in the activity and success indices.

Suggested Citation

  • Norbert Berthold & Nadya Kosturkova & Andreas Müller, 2010. "he German federal states in business location competition - yesterday, today and tomorrow," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(02), pages 15-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:63:y:2010:i:02:p:15-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2010_2_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huber, Bernd & Lichtblau, Karl, 1998. "Konfiskatorischer Finanzausgleich verlangt eine Reform," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 78(3), pages 142-147.
    2. Huber, Bernd & Lichtblau, Karl, 1998. "Konfiskatorischer Finanzausgleich verlangt eine Reform," Munich Reprints in Economics 19398, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    3. Karl Hausner & Silvia Simon, 2009. "Die neue Schuldenregel in Deutschland und die Schuldenbremse der Schweiz Wege zu nachhaltigen öffentlichen Finanzen?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 89(4), pages 265-271, April.
    4. Schneider, Lutz, 2005. "Ost-West-Binnenwanderung: Gravierender Verlust an Humankapital," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 11(10), pages 308-314.
    5. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2007. "Der Länderfinanzausgleich: wie sehr schadet er, wie sollte er reformiert werden?," Discussion Paper Series 94, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Hirsch & Norbert Donner-Banzhoff & Maike Schulz & Michael Erhart, 2018. "Detecting and Visualizing Outliers in Provider Profiling Using Funnel Plots and Mixed Effects Models—An Example from Prescription Claims Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scherf, Wolfgang, 2020. "Länderfinanzausgleich 2020: Neue Form - alte Probleme," Finanzwissenschaftliche Arbeitspapiere 102, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften.
    2. Michael Broer, 2008. "Wirkung einer Feiertagsbereinigung des Länderfinanzausgleichs: eine empirische Analyse des deutschen Finanzausgleichs," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 769, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Buettner Thiess & Krause Manuela, 2018. "Föderalismus im Wunderland: Zur Steuerautonomie bei der Grunderwerbsteuer," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 32-41, March.
    4. Sergey Sinelnikov & Pavel Kadochnikov & Ilya Trunin & Sergey Chetverikov & Marianne Vigneault, 2006. "Fiscal Federalism in Russia: Soft Budget Constraints of Regional Governments," Published Papers 47, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2012.
    5. Stahl, Dieter, 2005. "Ausgleichsgrad und Anzeizwirkungen des deutschen Länderfinanzausgleichs: Eine kritische Analyse," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Färber, Gisela (ed.), Das föderative System in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme, Reformbedarf und Handlungsempfehlungen aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht, volume 127, pages 206-230, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Fritz Söllner, 2001. "Inhabitant weighting in the fiscal equalisation scheme," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(03), pages 25-29, March.
    7. Achim Truger & Dieter Vesper, 2014. "Zur Reform des Länderfinanzausgleichs ? eine Notwendigkeit?," IMK Studies 37-2014, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    8. Buettner, Thiess, 2002. "Fiscal federalism and interstate risk sharing: empirical evidence from Germany," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 195-202, January.
    9. Robert Fenge & Jakob von Weizsäcker, 2001. "How Much Fiscal Equalization? A Constitutional Approach," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(4), pages 623-633, December.
    10. Berthold, Norbert & Kullas, Matthias, 2006. "Unternehmer: der Treibstoff des Wachstumsmotors!," Discussion Paper Series 89, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    11. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2009. "Die Bundesländer im Standortwettbewerb," Discussion Paper Series 106, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    12. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2003. "Deutschland im Herbst 2003 - blockierter Standortwettbewerb der Bundesländer," Discussion Paper Series 69, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    13. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2005. "Recht und Politik in der Reform des deutschen Föderalismus," MPIfG Working Paper 05/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Wolfgang Scherf & Wolfgang Kitterer & Gisela Färber & Thomas Lenk & Bernd Huber, 2001. "Reform of the German fiscal equalisation scheme," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(02), pages 03-18, February.
    15. Robert Fenge & Jakob von Weizsäcker, 2000. "How Much Fiscal Equalisation?," CESifo Working Paper Series 366, CESifo.
    16. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2007. "Der Länderfinanzausgleich: wie sehr schadet er, wie sollte er reformiert werden?," Discussion Paper Series 94, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    17. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2007. "Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der finanziellen Ausgleichsysteme in Deutschland," Discussion Paper Series 93, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    18. Schmidt, Torsten, 2001. "Finanzreformen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Analyse der Veränderungen der Finanzverfassung von 1949 bis 1989," RWI Schriften, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, volume 67, number 67.
    19. Sergey Sinelnikov & Pavel Kadochnikov & Ilya Trunin (ed.), 2006. "Fiscal Federalism in Russia: Soft Budget Constraints of Regional Governments," Books, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, edition 1, number 4, November.
    20. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger & Kullas, Matthias, 2004. "Mehr institutioneller Wettbewerb in Deutschland: Wirksame Hilfe für die neuen Bundesländer," Discussion Paper Series 73, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:63:y:2010:i:02:p:15-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.