IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v66y2021i9id238-2020-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress burden for dogs in a simple soundproof cage: Heart rate variability and behavioural analyses

Author

Listed:
  • A Uemura

    (Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan)

  • L Hamabe

    (Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan)

  • R Tanaka

    (Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

Dog barking, which reaches around 100 dB, often becomes a noise issue in urban environments. One potential solution, a simple soundproof cage, has recently been marketed. To our knowledge, no study has been conducted to investigate what sort of stress burden is imposed on dogs kept in cages, and it may raise animal welfare concerns. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to reveal whether staying in a soundproof cage caused stress for the dogs or not. Ten healthy domestic dogs (5 males, 5 females) of small body size were evaluated. The heart rate variability (HRV), behaviour, and internal and external temperature during confinement in a soundproof cage for each dog were analysed. The HRV analyses revealed no significant differences for any variables between confinement and non-confinement (HR, P > 0.999 9; rMSSD, P = 0.359 4; SDNN, P = 0.359 4; LF, P = 0.652 3; HF, P = 0.128 9; LF/HF, P = 0.222 7). Overall, in our behavioural analysis, there were no significant differences between confinement and non-confinement (P = 0.105 5). In conclusion, the HRV and behavioural analyses did not indicate an increased stress burden on the dogs during confinement in the soundproof cage compared with non-confinement. The inner temperature of the cage was not elevated either. Nevertheless, the stress imposed on dogs caused by a soundproof cage should always be considered on an individual basis, and the time spent in such a cage should always be kept to a minimum.

Suggested Citation

  • A Uemura & L Hamabe & R Tanaka, 2021. "Stress burden for dogs in a simple soundproof cage: Heart rate variability and behavioural analyses," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 376-384.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:66:y:2021:i:9:id:238-2020-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/238/2020-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/238/2020-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/238/2020-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/238/2020-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keita Honjo & Hiroto Shiraki & Shuichi Ashina, 2018. "Dynamic linear modeling of monthly electricity demand in Japan: Time variation of electricity conservation effect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Fink, D.J., 2017. "What is a safe noise level for the public?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(1), pages 44-45.
    3. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303527_2 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaneko, Nanae & Fujimoto, Yu & Hayashi, Yasuhiro, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis of factors relevant to extreme imbalance between procurement plans and actual demand: Case study of the Japanese electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    2. Said, Fathin Faizah & Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin & Md Nor, Nor Ghani & Mahmoud, Moamin A. & Begum, Rawshan Ara, 2022. "Decarbonizing the Global Electricity Sector through Demand-Side Management: A Systematic Critical Review of Policy Responses," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 56(1), pages 71-91.
    3. Khairul Azhar Abdul Rahim & Jegalakshimi Jewaratnam & Che Rosmani Che Hassan & Mahar Diana Hamid, 2020. "Effectiveness of a Novel Index System in Preventing Early Hearing Loss among Furniture Industry Skills Training Students in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Shi, Changfeng & Zhao, Yi & Zhang, Chenjun & Pang, Qinghua & Chen, Qiyong & Li, Ang, 2022. "Research on the driving effect of production electricity consumption changes in the Yangtze River Economic Zone - Based on regional and industrial perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    5. Lefeng, Shi & Chunxiu, Liu & Jingrong, Dong & Cipcigan, Liana, 2020. "External benefits calculation of sharing electric vehicles in case of Chongqing China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Kaneko, Nanae & Fujimoto, Yu & Kabe, Satoshi & Hayashida, Motonari & Hayashi, Yasuhiro, 2020. "Sparse modeling approach for identifying the dominant factors affecting situation-dependent hourly electricity demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Maximilian Ueberham & Uwe Schlink & Martin Dijst & Ulrike Weiland, 2019. "Cyclists’ Multiple Environmental Urban Exposures—Comparing Subjective and Objective Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Mohannad Nassar & Md Sofiqul Islam & Stancey D’souza & Milan Praveen & Mohammad Hani Al Masri & Salvatore Sauro & Ahmed Jamleh, 2023. "Tinnitus Prevalence and Associated Factors among Dental Clinicians in the United Arab Emirates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:66:y:2021:i:9:id:238-2020-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.