IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v57y2011i6id4-2011-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural development in the context of agricultural "green" subsidies: Czech farmers' responses

Author

Listed:
  • Miloslav LAPKA

    (Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Eva CUDLÍNOVÁ

    (Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • J. Sanford RIKOON

    (Department of Rural Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA)

  • Martin PĚLUCHA

    (Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Viktor KVETOŇ

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The study compares the role of agricultural green subsidies in rural development of the Czech Republic before and after joining the European Union (EU) in 2004. We use the perspective of multifunctional agriculture and contribute to the research on the contemporary trends in Czech agriculture by using the data collected through surveys in 2000 and 2006, as well as 2008 comparative statistical support, to ask if there have been significant changes and improvements in farmers' evaluations of these programs. The empirical case study results show some positive changes connected with the participation in the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). In spite of improvements, farmers continue to cite two primary weaknesses and constraints - administrative procedures and shifting program guidelines - that were evident prior to joining the EU. It can be assumed that the environmental subsidies in the Horizontal Rural Development Plan 2004-2006 have had an effect on the stabilization of the livelihoods of rural inhabitants. In general, there is a positive shift of valuation of the CAP among farmers in the Czech Republic.

Suggested Citation

  • Miloslav LAPKA & Eva CUDLÍNOVÁ & J. Sanford RIKOON & Martin PĚLUCHA & Viktor KVETOŇ, 2011. "Rural development in the context of agricultural "green" subsidies: Czech farmers' responses," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(6), pages 259-271.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:6:id:4-2011-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lukáš ČECHURA, 2010. "Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 183-191.
    2. Wossink, G. A. A. & de Koeijer, T. J. & Renkema, J. A., 1992. "Environmental-economic policy assessment: A farm economic approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 421-438.
    3. Leland Glenna, 1996. "Rationality, habitus, and agricultural landscapes: Ethnographic case studies in landscape sociology," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 13(4), pages 21-38, September.
    4. Lukas Zagata, 2010. "How organic farmers view their own practice: results from the Czech Republic," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 277-290, September.
    5. Janet Dwyer & Neil Ward & Philip Lowe & David Baldock, 2007. "European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy's 'Second Pillar': Institutional Conservatism and Innovation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 873-888.
    6. Terry Marsden & Jo Banks & Gillian Bristow, 2002. "The Social Management of Rural Nature: Understanding Agrarian-Based Rural Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 809-825, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Kabadzhova & Mihaela Mihailova & Daniela Tsvyatkova, 2024. "Farmers’ Attitudes To Implementation CAP Greening Practices in Both the Blagoevgrad and Kyustendil Regions in Bulgaria," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 128-149.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Swindal & Gilbert Gillespie & Rick Welsh, 2010. "Community digester operations and dairy farmer perspectives," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(4), pages 461-474, December.
    2. Qureshi, Muhammad Ejaz & Arunakumaren, J. & Bajracharya, K. & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Qureshi, S.E. & Bristow, Keith L., 2002. "Economic and environmental impacts of groundwater management scenarios in Burdekin Delta," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125148, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    4. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Bouzaher, Aziz & Shogren, Jason F. & Holtkamp, Derald & Gassman, Philip & Archer, David & Lakshminarayan, P. & Carriquiry, Alicia & Reese, Randall & Kakani, Dharmaraju & Furtan, William H. & Izaurrald, 1995. "Agricultural Policies and Soil Degradation in Western Canada: An Agro-Ecological Economic Assessment (Report 5: Project Summary)," Technical Reports 243858, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    6. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2021. "Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms - Based on evidence from Polish crop farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 152-161.
    7. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Kristensen, Søren Bech Pilgaard & Præstholm, Søren & Busck, Anne Gravsholt & Winther, Lars & Fertner, Christian & Vesterager, Jens Peter & Vejre, Henrik, 2019. "On-farm Business Structure Diversification in Greater Copenhagen—Farmers in an urban landscape or entrepreneurs in a rural landscape?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Marta Arbelo-Pérez & Pilar Pérez-Gómez & Antonio Arbelo, 2023. "Profit efficiency and its determinants in the agricultural sector: A Bayesian approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 436-445.
    10. Kristína KOČIŠOVÁ, 2015. "Application of the DEA on the measurement of efficiency in the EU countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(2), pages 51-62.
    11. Hana URBANCOVÁ & Helena ČERMÁKOVÁ, 2015. "The costs of Age Management in agricultural companies," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(1), pages 14-22.
    12. Julian Clark, 2006. "The Institutional Limits to Multifunctional Agriculture: Subnational Governance and Regional Systems of Innovation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 331-349, June.
    13. Brian Ilbery & Damian Maye, 2005. "Alternative (Shorter) Food Supply Chains and Specialist Livestock Products in the Scottish–English Borders," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(5), pages 823-844, May.
    14. Gianpaolo Basile & Aurora Cavallo, 2020. "Rural Identity, Authenticity, and Sustainability in Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Bouzaher, Aziz & Shogren, Jason F. & Holtkamp, Derald & Gassman, Philip & Archer, David & Lakshminarayan, P. & Carriquiry, Alicia & Reese, Randall & Furtan, William H. & Izaurralde, R. Cèsar & Kiniry,, 1994. "Agricultural Policies and Soil Degradation in Western Canada: An Agro-Ecological Economic Assessment (Report 3: The Integration of the Environmental and Economic Components)," Technical Reports 243854, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    16. Marta Arbelo-Pérez & Pilar Pérez-Gómez & Antonio Arbelo, . "Profit efficiency and its determinants in the agricultural sector: A Bayesian approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    17. Natallya Levino & Madson Monte & Carlos Costa & Walter Lima Filho, 2022. "A Multi-Methodological Analysis of Jabuticaba’s Supply Chain in an Agricultural Cooperative Production," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Jiří, Průša & Ondřej, Konečný & Jiří, Hrabák & Michal, Lošťák, 2022. "Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Thi Nga Bui & An Ha Nguyen & Thi Thu Huong Le & Van Phuong Nguyen & Thi Thanh Hao Le & Thi Thanh Huyen Tran & Ngoc Mai Nguyen & Thi Kim Oanh Le & Thi Kim Oanh Nguyen & Thi Thu Trang Nguyen & Hong Van , 2021. "Can a Short Food Supply Chain Create Sustainable Benefits for Small Farmers in Developing Countries? An Exploratory Study of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    20. van Ittersum, Martin K. & Ewert, Frank & Heckelei, Thomas & Wery, Jacques & Alkan Olsson, Johanna & Andersen, Erling & Bezlepkina, Irina & Brouwer, Floor & Donatelli, Marcello & Flichman, Guillermo & , 2008. "Integrated assessment of agricultural systems - A component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 96(1-3), pages 150-165, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:6:id:4-2011-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.