IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v116y2022ics0264837722000734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří, Průša
  • Ondřej, Konečný
  • Jiří, Hrabák
  • Michal, Lošťák

Abstract

Multifunctionality embedded in the neo-endogenous model of rural development and manifested through the LEADER approach typifies a new rural development paradigm, which is implemented by various actors. The focus of this paper is on the organic farmer as an actor who has a high degree of multifunctionality and importance in community-led local development. The research question behind this paper is whether such ideas are valid for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (in this case, Czechia). This paper examines the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural development through the prism of organic farmers who participated in LEADER approach supported projects from 2007 to 2013. It aims to identify how organic farmers engage in the LEADER approach and the impacts of the projects implemented by them (the thematic and spatial dimensions of the research). The results of a specially designed method of heuristic interventional investigation show that the projects implemented by organic farmers (namely, those operating large farms of 100–250 ha) implemented under the LEADER approach in 2007–2013 stimulated and stabilised development in localities that were threatened by disadvantageous social and economic circumstances. These projects contributed to the resilience of outlying districts with small settlements, a fact which though positive, suggests an uneven geographical implementation of the LEADER approach. The results came through utilising the endogenous potentials of nature and human origin, with land and landscape as a tourist attraction. However, organic farmers in Czechia are not yet fully exploiting their potential to become truly multifunctional and genuine actors in rural development. They utilise LEADER projects primarily for the purchase of farm machinery and technology or for other investments in farming. This is because of the prevailing need to continue building the organic sector, which has only been in emergence since 1989. Investments in agricultural production may result in organic farming becoming conventionalised and linked with productivism, thereby limiting its multifunctionality. Conversely, the research also found projects that reveal a multifunctional approach, particularly in relation to sustainability, which itself correlates with strong multifunctionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří, Průša & Ondřej, Konečný & Jiří, Hrabák & Michal, Lošťák, 2022. "Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000734
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722000734
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ondřej Konečný & Zdeněk Šilhan & Markéta Chaloupková & Hana Svobodová, 2021. "Area-based approaches are losing the essence of local targeting: LEADER/CLLD in the Czech Republic," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 619-636, April.
    2. Brian Ilbery & James Kirwan & Damian Maye, 2016. "Explaining Regional and Local Differences in Organic Farming in England and Wales: A Comparison of South West Wales and South East England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 110-123, January.
    3. José M. Díaz-Puente & Francisco J. Gallego & Pablo Vidueira & María J. Fernández, 2014. "Facilitation in Community Development. Twenty-Five Years of Experience in Rural Territories in Cuenca, Spain," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 2231-2247, November.
    4. Henk Renting & Henk Oostindie & Catherine Laurent & Gianluca Brunori & Dominique Barjolle & Anne Moxnes Jervell & Leo Granberg & Maarit Heinonen, 2008. "Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new institutional arrangements," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4/5), pages 361-385.
    5. Belliggiano Angelo & Sturla Alberto & Vassallo Marco & Viganò Laura, 2020. "Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in Favor of Organic Farming: Two Case Studies from Italian Fragile Areas," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Navarro, Francisco & Cejudo, Euginio & Maroto, Juan, 2016. "Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    7. Robert Hassink, 2005. "How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 521-535, June.
    8. José Antonio Cañete & Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo, 2018. "Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 726-744, April.
    9. Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2011. "Farmers adoption of integrated crop protection and organic farming: Do moral and social concerns matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1536-1545, June.
    10. Bock, Bettina B., 2012. "Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-7, October.
    11. Lukas Zagata, 2010. "How organic farmers view their own practice: results from the Czech Republic," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 277-290, September.
    12. Chmieliński, Paweł & Faccilongo, Nicola & Fiore, Mariantonietta & La Sala, Piermichele, 2018. "Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: a case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(1), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yueying Chen & Wenbin Wei, 2022. "Alterations of Historic Rural Landscape Based on the Multifunctional Approach: The Case of Coastal Fishing Villages in the Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. J. Francisco Rangel-Preciado & Francisco M. Parejo-Moruno & Esteban Cruz-Hidalgo & Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez, 2021. "Rural Districts and Business Agglomerations in Low-Density Business Environments. The Case of Extremadura (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Leduc, Gaëlle & Billaudet, Larissa & Engström, Ebba & Hansson, Helena & Ryan, Mary, 2023. "Farmers' perceived values in conventional and organic farming: A comparison between French, Irish and Swedish farmers using the Means-end chain approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Rik Wenting & Koen Frenken, 2011. "Firm entry and institutional lock-in: an organizational ecology analysis of the global fashion design industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 20(4), pages 1031-1048, August.
    8. Abdul Waheed & Chuang Li & Murad Muhammad & Mushtaq Ahmad & Khalid Ali Khan & Hamed A. Ghramh & Zhongwei Wang & Daoyuan Zhang, 2023. "Sustainable Potato Growth under Straw Mulching Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    11. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    12. Md. Samiul Alim & Mst. Sharmin Sultana, 2023. "Causes of farmers’ aversion to organic vegetable production in Shyamnagar and Kaligonj Upazilla of Bangladesh," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 13(1), June.
    13. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Wollni, Meike & Andersson, Camilla, 2014. "Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption: Evidence from Honduras," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 120-128.
    15. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Lobanov, M. & Zvezdanovic Lobanova, J. & Zvezdanovic, M., 2022. "Typologization of industrial systems in the countries of Central-Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 56(4), pages 92-122.
    17. Székely, Vladimír, 2013. "Urban-rural relations as a source of transfer of knowledge: some examples from rural surrounding of Bratislava," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 10, pages 1-21.
    18. Syed Aflatun Kabir Hemel & Mohammad Kamrul Hasan & Md. Abdul Wadud & Rojina Akter & Nasima Akther Roshni & Md. Tariqul Islam & Afsana Yasmin & Keya Akter, 2022. "Improvement of Farmers’ Livelihood through Choi Jhal ( Piper chaba )-Based Agroforestry System: Instance from the Northern Region of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Hermann, Daniel & Musshoff, Oliver & Agethen, Katrin, 2014. "I will never switch sides: an experimental approach to determine drivers for investment decisions of conventional and organic hog farmers," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183084, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.