IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5184-d549472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Olar

    (Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mugurel I. Jitea

    (Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

LEADER is an EU development method that aims to stimulate local actors to cooperate and co-produce ideas and projects that otherwise would not be possible. Therefore, the Local Action Groups (LAGs) should not only focus on implementing the Local Development Strategies but also to actively contribute to the development of their territory. The aim of the present paper is to underline the most important tangible indirect multiplier effects produced by the LAGs in Romania in the 2014–2020 Programming Period and to identify the enabling characteristics and conditions for maximizing such effects in future LEADER actions. The study was conducted using the structured interview as a primary method for collecting data. The results were analyzed using the Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis. The most important multiplier effects were the amount of non-LEADER grants that LAGs managed to attract and the innovation level of the projects supported from LEADER funding. The results show that the performance of LAGs is linked to the size of their team, their experience, and the involvement of their partners. However, not all LAGs managed to generate significant multiplier effects, suggesting that they still lack the experience necessary to successfully implement the method in their territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5184-:d:549472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navarro, Francisco & Cejudo, Euginio & Maroto, Juan, 2016. "Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Dax, Thomas & Oedl-Wieser, Theresia, 2016. "Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    3. José Antonio Cañete & Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo, 2018. "Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 726-744, April.
    4. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    5. Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Luis Manuel Costa Moreno, 2019. "Principal Component Analysis of the LEADER Approach (2007–2013) in South Western Europe (Extremadura and Alentejo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Maria Elena Menconi & Sara Artemi & Piero Borghi & David Grohmann, 2018. "Role of Local Action Groups in Improving the Sense of Belonging of Local Communities with Their Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Zajda Katarzyna, 2014. "Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 73-97, December.
    8. Chmieliński, Paweł & Faccilongo, Nicola & Fiore, Mariantonietta & La Sala, Piermichele, 2018. "Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: a case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(1), April.
    9. Labianca, Marilena & De Rubertis, Stefano & Belliggiano, Angelo & Salento, Angelo, 2016. "Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazgul Esengulova & Massimo Manrico Carella & Antonio Lopolito, 2023. "Stakeholder Empowerment in Sustainable Rural Development Partnerships: Two Case Studies from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Ana-Maria Opria & Lucian Roșu & Corneliu Iațu, 2021. "LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Monica Elena Crunțeanu & Mircea Comșa & Gina Fîntîneru, 2024. "The Impact of LEADER Funding in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Tiberiu Iancu & Ionuț Laurențiu Petre & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu & Ana Ursu & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru, 2022. "A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Jiří, Průša & Ondřej, Konečný & Jiří, Hrabák & Michal, Lošťák, 2022. "Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Belliggiano Angelo & Sturla Alberto & Vassallo Marco & Viganò Laura, 2020. "Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in Favor of Organic Farming: Two Case Studies from Italian Fragile Areas," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Ana-Maria Opria & Lucian Roșu & Corneliu Iațu, 2021. "LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Mercedes Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Sanchez & Eugenio Cejudo & Jose Antonio Camacho, 2019. "Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 43-50.
    6. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    7. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Ievoli Corrado & Belliggiano Angelo & Marandola Danilo & Milone Pierluigi & Ventura Flaminia, 2019. "Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 475-496, December.
    9. J. Francisco Rangel-Preciado & Francisco M. Parejo-Moruno & Esteban Cruz-Hidalgo & Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez, 2021. "Rural Districts and Business Agglomerations in Low-Density Business Environments. The Case of Extremadura (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2022. "Mapping the Optimal Rural Areas to Invest in through the LEADER Approach: Case Study—Extremadura (SW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Székely, Vladimír & Novotný, Ján, 2019. "Geographical context of the registered LEADER Local Action Groups in Slovakia (EU 2014-2020 programming period)," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 309059, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    12. Székely, Vladimír & Novotný, Ján, 2019. "Geographical context of the registered LEADER Local Action Groups in Slovakia (EU 2014-2020 programming period)," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 16.
    13. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Konečný Ondřej, 2019. "The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Eugenio Cejudo García & José Antonio Cañete Pérez & Francisco Navarro Valverde & Noelia Ruiz Moya, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Territorial Diversity: Success and Failure in Andalusia 2007–2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Tulla Antoni F., 2019. "Sustainable Rural Development Requires Value-Added Activities Linked with Comparative Advantage: The Case of the Catalan Pyrenees," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 229-256, June.
    17. Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez & Ana Nieto Masot & José Castro-Serrano, 2020. "Intangibles of Rural Development. The Case Study of La Vera (Extremadura, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Henriette Cristiana Calin & Radu Antohe & Florica Georgeta Rotaru, 2018. "Information and communication technology(ICT) based on modern farming: solution for sustainable agriculture," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 7, pages 183-188.
    19. Adamashvili Nino & Fiore Mariantonietta & Contò Francesco & La Sala Piermichele, 2020. "Ecosystem for Successful Agriculture. Collaborative Approach as a Driver for Agricultural Development," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 242-256, June.
    20. Danuta, Guzal-Dec, 2016. "Social Innovations Under The Leader Initiative In The Development Of The Environmentally Valuable Areas Of The Lublin Region (Poland)," Acta Carolus Robertus, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 6(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5184-:d:549472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.