IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v77y2023i3p365-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian solution to the monotone likelihood in the standard mixture cure model

Author

Listed:
  • Frederico M. Almeida
  • Vinícius D. Mayrink
  • Enrico A. Colosimo

Abstract

An advantage of the standard mixture cure model over an usual survival model is how it accounts for the population heterogeneity. It allows a joint estimation for the distribution related to the susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects. The estimation algorithm may provide ±∞$$ \pm \infty $$ coefficients when the likelihood cannot be maximized. This phenomenon is known as Monotone Likelihood (ML), common in survival and logistic regressions. The ML tends to appear in situations with small sample size, many censored times, many binary or unbalanced covariates. Particularly, it occurs when all uncensored cases correspond to one level of a binary covariate. The existing frequentist solution is an adaptation of the Firth correction, originally proposed to reduce bias of maximum likelihood estimates. It prevents ±∞$$ \pm \infty $$ estimates by penalizing the likelihood, with the penalty interpreted as the Bayesian Jeffreys prior. In this paper, the penalized likelihood of the standard mixture cure model is considered with different penalties (Bayesian priors). A Monte Carlo simulation study indicates good inference results, especially for balanced data sets. Finally, a real application involving a melanoma data illustrates the approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederico M. Almeida & Vinícius D. Mayrink & Enrico A. Colosimo, 2023. "Bayesian solution to the monotone likelihood in the standard mixture cure model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(3), pages 365-390, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:365-390
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judy P. Sy & Jeremy M. G. Taylor, 2000. "Estimation in a Cox Proportional Hazards Cure Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 227-236, March.
    2. Frederico Machado Almeida & Enrico Antônio Colosimo & Vinícius Diniz Mayrink, 2021. "Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 131-155, January.
    3. Andrea Discacciati & Nicola Orsini & Sander Greenland, 2015. "Approximate Bayesian logistic regression via penalized likelihood by data augmentation," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(3), pages 712-736, September.
    4. Schmidt, Peter & Witte, Ann Dryden, 1989. "Predicting criminal recidivism using 'split population' survival time models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 141-159, January.
    5. Peng, Yingwei, 2003. "Estimating baseline distribution in proportional hazards cure models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 187-201, February.
    6. Peijie Wang & Xingwei Tong & Jianguo Sun, 2018. "A semiparametric regression cure model for doubly censored data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 492-508, July.
    7. Rainey, Carlisle, 2016. "Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 339-355, July.
    8. Sander Greenland, 2003. "Generalized Conjugate Priors for Bayesian Analysis of Risk and Survival Regressions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 92-99, March.
    9. Georg Heinze & Michael Schemper, 2001. "A Solution to the Problem of Monotone Likelihood in Cox Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 114-119, March.
    10. Siddhartha Chib & Ivan Jeliazkov, 2005. "Accept–reject Metropolis–Hastings sampling and marginal likelihood estimation," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(1), pages 30-44, February.
    11. Dupuis, D. J., 2001. "Fitting log-F models robustly, with an application to the analysis of extreme values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 321-333, January.
    12. Yingwei Peng & Keith B. G. Dear, 2000. "A Nonparametric Mixture Model for Cure Rate Estimation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 237-243, March.
    13. Zorn, Christopher, 2005. "A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 157-170, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frederico Machado Almeida & Enrico Antônio Colosimo & Vinícius Diniz Mayrink, 2021. "Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 131-155, January.
    2. Rahmouni, Mohieddine, 2023. "Corruption and corporate innovation in Tunisia during an economic downturn," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 314-326.
    3. Bremhorst, Vincent & Lambert, Philippe, 2013. "Flexible estimation in cure survival models using Bayesian P-splines," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2013039, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Bremhorst, Vincent & Lambert, Philippe, 2016. "Flexible estimation in cure survival models using Bayesian P-splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 270-284.
    5. Lai, Xin & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2010. "Extending the long-term survivor mixture model with random effects for clustered survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2103-2112, September.
    6. Liu, Fan & Hua, Zhongsheng & Lim, Andrew, 2015. "Identifying future defaulters: A hierarchical Bayesian method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 202-211.
    7. Edith Gray & Ann Evans & Jon Anderson & Rebecca Kippen, 2010. "Using Split-Population Models to Examine Predictors of the Probability and Timing of Parity Progression," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 275-295, August.
    8. Mioara Alina Nicolaie & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Catherine Legrand, 2019. "Vertical modeling: analysis of competing risks data with a cure fraction," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Narisetty, Naveen & Koenker, Roger, 2022. "Censored quantile regression survival models with a cure proportion," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 192-203.
    10. Xu, Linzhi & Zhang, Jiajia, 2010. "Multiple imputation method for the semiparametric accelerated failure time mixture cure model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(7), pages 1808-1816, July.
    11. Dirick, Lore & Claeskens, Gerda & Vasnev, Andrey & Baesens, Bart, 2022. "A hierarchical mixture cure model with unobserved heterogeneity for credit risk," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 39-55.
    12. Chen, Chyong-Mei & Lu, Tai-Fang C., 2012. "Marginal analysis of multivariate failure time data with a surviving fraction based on semiparametric transformation cure models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 645-655.
    13. Guoqing Diao & Ao Yuan, 2019. "A class of semiparametric cure models with current status data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 26-51, January.
    14. Ana López-Cheda & Yingwei Peng & María Amalia Jácome, 2023. "Nonparametric estimation in mixture cure models with covariates," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(2), pages 467-495, June.
    15. Li, Chin-Shang & Taylor, Jeremy M. G. & Sy, Judy P., 2001. "Identifiability of cure models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 389-395, October.
    16. Mani Suleiman & Haydar Demirhan & Leanne Boyd & Federico Girosi & Vural Aksakalli, 2019. "Bayesian logistic regression approaches to predict incorrect DRG assignment," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 364-375, June.
    17. Mengling Liu & Wenbin Lu & Yongzhao Shao, 2006. "Interval Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Time-to-Event Data with the Proportional Hazards Mixture Cure Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1053-1061, December.
    18. López-Cheda, Ana & Cao, Ricardo & Jácome, M. Amalia & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2017. "Nonparametric incidence estimation and bootstrap bandwidth selection in mixture cure models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 144-165.
    19. Yi-Hsuan Lee & Zhiliang Ying, 2015. "A Mixture Cure-Rate Model for Responses and Response Times in Time-Limit Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 748-775, September.
    20. Guosheng Yin, 2005. "Bayesian Cure Rate Frailty Models with Application to a Root Canal Therapy Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 552-558, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:365-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.