IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v37y2020i5p804-812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Scales

Abstract

This paper illustrates one researcher's experience of applying design science research (DSR) to the nexus between systems thinking and project scheduling. Project management has become increasingly popular in the decades since its advent but has changed little in that time. This is especially true because of its signature technique, project scheduling. Scheduling research however is vibrant and modern and even includes dynamic concepts such as learning curves in schedule construction. However, justifications for acquiring this level of systems literacy have not yet convinced the practice community. A similar gap is identified in management science, and a literature review yields two potential solutions: dissolving the subjective‐objective divide by adopting Critical Realism and using DSR as a framework for producing artefacts. This paper outlines how these concepts were applied to project scheduling, resulting in a new method for schedule construction that allows an expanded range of concepts to be included.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Scales, 2020. "A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 804-812, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:37:y:2020:i:5:p:804-812
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2743
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herroelen, Willy & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Reyck, Bert, 2001. "A note on the paper "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models and methods" by Brucker et al," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 679-688, February.
    2. Graham Kendall & Ruibin Bai & Jacek Błazewicz & Patrick De Causmaecker & Michel Gendreau & Robert John & Jiawei Li & Barry McCollum & Erwin Pesch & Rong Qu & Nasser Sabar & Greet Vanden Berghe , 2016. "Good Laboratory Practice for optimization research," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(4), pages 676-689, April.
    3. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    4. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    6. Thomas L. Saaty, 1998. "Reflections and Projections on Creativity in Operations Research and Management Science: A Pressing Need for a Shift in Paradigm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 9-16, February.
    7. Joan E. van Aken, 2004. "Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 219-246, March.
    8. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    9. Philipp Baumann & Norbert Trautmann, 2016. "A note on the selection of priority rules in software packages for project management," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 694-702, December.
    10. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1997. "PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library : OR Software - ORSEP Operations Research Software Exchange Program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 205-216, January.
    11. J Mingers, 2000. "The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(11), pages 1256-1270, November.
    12. James E. Kelley, 1961. "Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 296-320, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roelien Goede, 2020. "Nature's enduring patterns: A path to systems literacy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 787-788, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moukrim, Aziz & Quilliot, Alain & Toussaint, Hélène, 2015. "An effective branch-and-price algorithm for the Preemptive Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem based on minimal Interval Order Enumeration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 360-368.
    2. Gómez Sánchez, Mariam & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Fernández Gil, Alejandro & Castro, Carlos & Voß, Stefan, 2023. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 958-976.
    3. Yang-Kuei Lin & Chin Soon Chong, 2017. "Fast GA-based project scheduling for computing resources allocation in a cloud manufacturing system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1189-1201, June.
    4. Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, José, 2016. "An approach using SAT solvers for the RCPSP with logical constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 577-591.
    5. Alexander Tesch, 2020. "A polyhedral study of event-based models for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 233-251, April.
    6. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    7. Byung-Cheon Choi & Changmuk Kang, 2019. "A linear time–cost tradeoff problem with multiple milestones under a comb graph," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 341-361, August.
    8. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    9. Philippe Lacomme & Aziz Moukrim & Alain Quilliot & Marina Vinot, 2019. "Integration of routing into a resource-constrained project scheduling problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(4), pages 421-464, December.
    10. Cédric Verbeeck & Vincent Peteghem & Mario Vanhoucke & Pieter Vansteenwegen & El-Houssaine Aghezzaf, 2017. "A metaheuristic solution approach for the time-constrained project scheduling problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 353-371, March.
    11. F. Perez & T. Gomez, 2016. "Multiobjective project portfolio selection with fuzzy constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 7-29, October.
    12. Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "MIP models for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 335-348.
    13. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Korytkowski, Przemyslaw & Malachowski, Bartlomiej, 2019. "Competence-based estimation of activity duration in IT projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 708-720.
    15. Hua Wang & Jon Dieringer & Steve Guntz & Shankarraman Vaidyaraman & Shekhar Viswanath & Nikolaos H. Lappas & Sal Garcia-Munoz & Chrysanthos E. Gounaris, 2021. "Portfolio-Wide Optimization of Pharmaceutical R&D Activities Using Mathematical Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 262-279, July.
    16. He, Zhengwen & Liu, Renjing & Jia, Tao, 2012. "Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 605-613.
    17. Nicole Megow & Rolf H. Möhring & Jens Schulz, 2011. "Decision Support and Optimization in Shutdown and Turnaround Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 189-204, May.
    18. Florian Mischek & Nysret Musliu & Andrea Schaerf, 2023. "Local search approaches for the test laboratory scheduling problem with variable task grouping," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 457-477, October.
    19. Gonzalo Muñoz & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Maurice Queyranne & Orlando Rivera Letelier, 2018. "A study of the Bienstock–Zuckerberg algorithm: applications in mining and resource constrained project scheduling," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 501-534, March.
    20. Mick Van Den Eeckhout & Broos Maenhout & Mario Vanhoucke, 2020. "Mode generation rules to define activity flexibility for the integrated project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 133-160, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:37:y:2020:i:5:p:804-812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.