IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v14y2022i4p718-739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key conditions for Euroregions development at external EU borders: A case study of the Polish–Belarusian borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Studzieniecki
  • Andrzej Jakubowski
  • Beata Meyer

Abstract

External borders of the European Union (EU) constitute a significant spatial and formal legal barrier for mutual relations. The key role in overcoming this barrier is played by cross‐border cooperation implemented by subnational units. The objective of this article is to identify key conditions for the cross‐border cooperation on the Polish–Belarusian border, constituting the external border of the EU. An additional objective is to develop a concept of institutionalization of the cross‐border cooperation, and to point to the possibilities of its implementation in the area of the Polish–Belarusian Euroregion Przybuże. This objective has been implemented by means of the triangulation method with the application of interrelated research techniques such as focus group interview, moderated workshop, surveys and desk research. The research discovered long‐term, intense cross‐border relations existing in the said region. The leaders of the cooperation were identified on both sides of the border. The institutionalization of this cooperation through the creation of the Euroregion was recognized by the stakeholders as an opportunity to dynamize social and economic development and to absorb EU funds more effectively. The developed concept of Euroregions creation and the case study analysis enrich the scientific output related to the theory of territorial cooperation, and offer practical solutions useful in the development of cross‐border areas, with particular consideration of regions located at the external borders of the EU. 欧州連合(EU)の対外国境(external borders)は、相互関係のための重要な空間的、形式的な法的障壁を構築する。この障壁を克服する上で重要な役割を果たしているのは、国境を越えた協力であり、それを実施しているのが地方組織である。本稿の目的は、EUの対外国境であるポーランドとベラルーシの国境における国境協力のための重要な条件を明らかにすることであり、また、国境協力の制度化の概念を展開し、ポーランドとベラルーシの間のユーロリージョンにおける協力の可能性を指摘することである。この目的は、フォーカスグループインタビュー、モデレーテッドワークショップ、観測調査およびデスクリサーチのような相互に関連した研究技術を適用した三角測量法により実施した。その結果、その地域に長期的で強固な国境を越えた関係が存在することが見いだされた。その協力の指導者たちは国境の両側で確認された。ユーロリージョンの創造を通じたこの協力の制度化は、社会的・経済的発展を活性化し、EU資金をより効果的に吸収する機会として、ステークホルダーに認識された。ユーロリージョンの創造の概念とケーススタディの分析は、地域協力の理論に関連する科学的成果を豊かにし、特にEUの対外国境に位置する地域を考慮して、国境を越えた地域の開発に有用な実用的解決策を提供するものである。 Las fronteras exteriores de la Unión Europea (UE) constituyen una importante barrera espacial y jurídica formal para las relaciones mutuas. El papel más importante para superar esta barrera lo desempeña la cooperación transfronteriza, llevada a cabo por las unidades subnacionales. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar las condiciones clave para la cooperación transfronteriza en la frontera polaco‐bielorrusa, que forma la frontera exterior de la UE. Un objetivo adicional fue desarrollar un concepto de institucionalización de la cooperación transfronteriza, y señalar las posibilidades de su aplicación en el área de la Eurorregión polaco‐bielorrusa Przybuże. Este objetivo se ha llevado a cabo mediante el método de triangulación, aplicando técnicas de investigación interrelacionadas como los grupos focales, el taller moderado, las encuestas y la investigación de gabinete. La investigación descubrió relaciones transfronterizas intensas que existen desde hace tiempo en dicha región. Los líderes de la cooperación fueron identificados a ambos lados de la frontera. La institucionalización de esta cooperación a través de la creación de la Eurorregión fue reconocida por las partes interesadas como una oportunidad para dinamizar el desarrollo social y económico y para atraer fondos de la UE con mayor eficacia. El concepto desarrollado de la creación de Eurorregiones y el análisis de estudios de caso enriquecen la producción científica relacionada con la teoría de la cooperación territorial y ofrecen soluciones prácticas útiles para el desarrollo de las zonas transfronterizas, con especial consideración de las regiones situadas en las fronteras exteriores de la UE.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Studzieniecki & Andrzej Jakubowski & Beata Meyer, 2022. "Key conditions for Euroregions development at external EU borders: A case study of the Polish–Belarusian borderland," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 718-739, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:718-739
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrzej Jakubowski & Tomasz Komornicki & Karol Kowalczyk & Andrzej Miszczuk, 2020. "Poland as a hub of the Silk Road Economic Belt: is the narrative of opportunity supported by developments on the ground?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 367-396, September.
    2. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 986-996, July.
    3. Eduardo Medeiros, 2011. "(Re)defining the Euroregion Concept," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 141-158, January.
    4. Vinokurov, Evgeny & Libman, Alexander, 2012. "Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism," MPRA Paper 61639, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Yurii Maslov, 2018. "The Eu Strategy For The Danube Region As An Inclusive Form Of Cross-Border Economy," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    6. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(5), pages 485-513, October.
    7. Markus Perkmann, 1999. "Building Governance Institutions Across European Borders," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 657-667.
    8. Beatrix Haselsberger, 2014. "Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 505-526, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    2. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2018. "Economic integration and growth at the margin: A space-time incremental impact analysis," Ruhr Economic Papers 775, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2023. "The complex regional effects of macro-institutional shocks: Evidence from EU economic integration over three decades," Ruhr Economic Papers 1007, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Andrea Caragliu, 2022. "Better together: Untapped potentials in Central Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1051-1085, October.
    5. Federico Fantechi & Ugo Fratesi, 2023. "Border Effects on firm's productivity: The role of peripherality and territorial capital," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(3), pages 483-506, June.
    6. Arie Stoffelen & Dominique Vanneste, 2017. "Tourism and cross-border regional development: insights in European contexts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1013-1033, June.
    7. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    8. Odile Heddebaut, 2015. "Has the construction of the Channel tunnel been a factor of rapprochement of the cities of Calais and Dover and of their respective regions?," Post-Print hal-01355614, HAL.
    9. Ma, Wen & Fang, Zhuoqiong & Zhang, Xiangfeng, 2023. "Comparative analysis of structural characteristics of China's 18 typical urban agglomerations based on flows of various elements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    10. Libman, Alexander & Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2016. "Региональные Организации: Типы И Логика Развития [Regional Organizations: Typology and Development Paths]," MPRA Paper 79383, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    12. Arno van der Zwet & Irene McMaster & John Bachtler, 2012. "Governance approaches in European territorial cooperation programmes and the implications of macro-regional strategies," ERSA conference papers ersa12p337, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    14. Katarína Melichová & Lukáš Varecha, 2020. "Endogenous Political, Institutional, Cultural, and Geographic Determinants of Intermunicipal Cooperation—Evidence from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 223-239, February.
    16. Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, 2002. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    17. Ketevani Kapanadze, 2021. "Checkmate! Losing with Borders, Winning with Centers. The Case of European Integration," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp716, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Eva Cihelková & Yelena Frolova, 2014. "The Impact Of Regionalism On Regional Development Under The Conditions Of A Globalized Economy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 46-57.
    19. Vinokurov, Evgeny & Libman, Alexander, 2017. "Eurasian integration and its institutions: possible contributions to security in Eurasia," MPRA Paper 83021, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Vinokurov, Evgeny & Libman, Alexander, 2012. "Eurasia and Eurasian Integration: Beyond the Post-Soviet Borders," MPRA Paper 49182, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:718-739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.