IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v38y2021i6p732-753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural laboratories in emerging countries and comparative advantages in science: Evidence from Chile

Author

Listed:
  • José Miguel Aguilera
  • Felipe Larraín

Abstract

Entering the knowledge society and mobilizing science and technology are critical for emerging countries (ECs) to address important challenges of society and promote long‐term economic growth. Natural laboratories (NLs) are geographical or geophysical singularities that provide comparative advantages and leverage to ECs for scientific research and international collaboration. Based on empirical evidence and learning experiences from five NLs in Chile, we propose the foundations of a conceptual framework for public scientific policies based on NLs and their possible implementation in ECs. Scientific research in NLs may address local, national, and global societal challenges while decentralizing scientific activities, encouraging transdisciplinary research in territories, anticipating the effects of climate change, and protecting biodiversity while promoting international partnerships and alignment with 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. 进入知识社会和动员科学与技术（S&T），对新兴国家（ECs）应对重要社会挑战和推动长期经济增长而言至关重要。自然实验室（NLs）是一系列为新兴国家提供比较优势进行科学研究及国际协作的地理位置或地球物理位置。基于从智利的5个自然实验室得出的实证证据和学习经验，我们提出一项概念框架的基本组成部分，这一概念框架聚焦于有关自然实验室及其在新兴国家中的执行方案的公共科学政策。在自然实验室进行的科学研究可能在应对地方、国家及全球社会挑战的同时对科学活动进行去中心化，鼓励跨学科研究，预期气候变化的效果和保护生物多样性，以及推动与2030年可持续发展目标相一致的国际合作伙伴关系。 Entrar en la sociedad del conocimiento y movilizar la ciencia y la tecnología (CyT) son fundamentales para que los países emergentes (PE) aborden importantes desafíos de la sociedad y promuevan el crecimiento económico a largo plazo. Los laboratorios naturales (LN) son singularidades geográficas o geofísicas que brindan ventajas comparativas y apalancamiento a los (PE) para la investigación científica y la colaboración internacional. Con base en la evidencia empírica y las experiencias de aprendizaje de cinco (LN) en Chile, proponemos las bases de un marco conceptual para las políticas científicas públicas basadas en (LN) y su posible implementación en las PE. La investigación científica en los PE puede abordar los desafíos sociales locales, nacionales y globales al tiempo que descentraliza las actividades científicas, fomenta la investigación transdisciplinaria en los territorios, anticipa los efectos del cambio climático y protege la biodiversidad, al tiempo que promueve las asociaciones internacionales y la alineación con los ODS de 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • José Miguel Aguilera & Felipe Larraín, 2021. "Natural laboratories in emerging countries and comparative advantages in science: Evidence from Chile," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 732-753, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:6:p:732-753
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12450
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. König, Bettina & Diehl, Katharina & Tscherning, Karen & Helming, Katharina, 2013. "A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 261-272.
    2. Roland Pease, 1999. "Andes observatories belatedly take root," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6726), pages 13-13, April.
    3. Manish Shrivastava & Meinrat O. Andreae & Paulo Artaxo & Henrique M. J. Barbosa & Larry K. Berg & Joel Brito & Joseph Ching & Richard C. Easter & Jiwen Fan & Jerome D. Fast & Zhe Feng & Jose D. Fuente, 2019. "Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Bell, Martin & Albu, Michael, 1999. "Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1715-1734, September.
    5. Engels, Franziska & Wentland, Alexander & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2019. "Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    6. Liz O'Brien & Mariella Marzano & Rehema M. White, 2013. "'Participatory interdisciplinarity': Towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 51-61, January.
    7. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    8. Milena Holmgren & Stefan A Schnitzer, 2004. "Science on the Rise in Developing Countries," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(1), pages 1-1, January.
    9. Paulina Aldunce & Dámare Araya & Rodolfo Sapiain & Issa Ramos & Gloria Lillo & Anahí Urquiza & René Garreaud, 2017. "Local Perception of Drought Impacts in a Changing Climate: The Mega-Drought in Central Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Engels, Franziska & Wentland, Alexander & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2019. "Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48(9), pages 1-11.
    11. David A. King, 2004. "The scientific impact of nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6997), pages 311-316, July.
    12. Gilbert Faccarello, 2015. "Comparative advantage," Post-Print halshs-01180914, HAL.
    13. Ying fan and Adonis Yatchew, 2016. "Introduction," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(China Spe).
    14. Padilla-Pérez, Ramón & Gaudin, Yannick, 2014. "Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 749-759.
    15. Barletta, Florencia & Yoguel, Gabriel & Pereira, Mariano & Rodríguez, Sergio, 2017. "Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1361-1369.
    16. Sara Reardon, 2016. "Can Cuban science go global?," Nature, Nature, vol. 537(7622), pages 600-603, September.
    17. Crane, Diana, 1977. "Technological innovation in developing countries: a review of the literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 374-395, October.
    18. Biancani, Susan & Dahlander, Linus & McFarland, Daniel A. & Smith, Sanne, 2018. "Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 543-557.
    19. Samuel Fankhauser & Nicholas Stern, 2016. "Climate change, development, poverty and economics," GRI Working Papers 253, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. Jonathan Adams, 2013. "The fourth age of research," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7451), pages 557-560, May.
    21. Aleszu Bajak, 2017. "Chile’s chance to embrace science for the twenty-first century," Nature, Nature, vol. 552(7684), pages 53-55, December.
    22. Guridi, Jose A. & Pertuze, Julio A. & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2020. "Natural laboratories as policy instruments for technological learning and institutional capacity building: The case of Chile's astronomy cluster," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung & Ilana Schröder & Colette S. Vogeler, 2021. "The transformative power of technological change for public policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 638-639, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Tennant & Susan Howard & Sally Stares, 2021. "Building the UK vision of a driverless future: A Parliamentary Inquiry case study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    3. Martin Kalthaus, 2020. "Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 643-704, July.
    4. Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M. & Wentland, Alexander & Ruge, Luise, 2023. "Understanding regional innovation cultures: Narratives, directionality, and conservative innovation in Bavaria," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    5. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Scientific Output and GDP: Evidence from Countries around the World," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 38-41.
    6. João Carlos Nabout & Micael Rosa Parreira & Fabrício Barreto Teresa & Fernanda Melo Carneiro & Hélida Ferreira Cunha & Luciana Souza Ondei & Samantha Salomão Caramori & Thannya Nascimento Soares, 2015. "Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 357-364, January.
    7. Hannes Thees & Harald Pechlaner & Natalie Olbrich & Arne Schuhbert, 2020. "The Living Lab as a Tool to Promote Residents’ Participation in Destination Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Inés Aquilué & Angélica Caicedo & Joan Moreno & Miquel Estrada & Laia Pagès, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Living Labs on Urban Design: The Case of the Furnish Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    9. Tanel Hirv, 2022. "The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1295-1316, March.
    10. Diego Kozlowski & Jennifer Dusdal & Jun Pang & Andreas Zilian, 2021. "Semantic and relational spaces in science of science: deep learning models for article vectorisation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5881-5910, July.
    11. Guridi, Jose A. & Pertuze, Julio A. & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2020. "Natural laboratories as policy instruments for technological learning and institutional capacity building: The case of Chile's astronomy cluster," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    12. Barbieri, Elisa & Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Pollio, Chiara & Rubini, Lauretta, 2020. "Getting the specialization right. Industrialization in Southern China in a sustainable development perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Pel, Bonno & Haxeltine, Alex & Avelino, Flor & Dumitru, Adina & Kemp, René & Bauler, Tom & Kunze, Iris & Dorland, Jens & Wittmayer, Julia & Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard, 2020. "Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    14. Ran Sun & James Nolan & Suren Kulshreshtha, 2022. "Agent-based modeling of policy induced agri-environmental technology adoption," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-26, August.
    15. Hepburn, Cameron & Mealy, Penny, 2017. "Transformational Change: Parallels for addressing climate and development goals," INET Oxford Working Papers 2019-02, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised May 2019.
    16. Zoo, Hanah & de Vries, Henk J. & Lee, Heejin, 2017. "Interplay of innovation and standardization: Exploring the relevance in developing countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 334-348.
    17. Katharina Greve & Riccardo De Vita & Seppo Leminen & Mika Westerlund, 2021. "Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Scientific Output: Evidence from Iran and the Middle East," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 2(4), pages 138-142.
    19. Confraria, Hugo & Mira Godinho, Manuel & Wang, Lili, 2017. "Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 265-279.
    20. Quentin Toffolini & Mathieu Capitaine & Mourad Hannachi & Marianne Cerf, 2021. "Implementing agricultural living labs that renew actors’ roles within existing innovation systems: A case study in France [La mise en œuvre de living labs qui renouvellent les rôles des acteurs au ," Post-Print hal-03412682, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:6:p:732-753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.