The difference and system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity. As implemented in popular software, the estimators easily generate instruments that are numerous and, in system GMM, potentially suspect. A large instrument collection overfits endogenous variables even as it weakens the Hansen test of the instruments' joint validity. This paper reviews the evidence on the effects of instrument proliferation, and describes and simulates simple ways to control it. It illustrates the dangers by replicating Forbes ["American Economic Review" (2000) Vol. 90, pp. 869-887] on income inequality and Levine "et al." ["Journal of Monetary Economics"] (2000) Vol. 46, pp. 31-77] on financial sector development. Results in both papers appear driven by previously undetected endogeneity. Copyright (c) Center for Global Development 2009.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Simeon Djankov & Jose Montalvo & Marta Reynal-Querol, 2008.
"The curse of aid,"
Journal of Economic Growth,
Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 169-194, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Simeon Djankov & José Garcia Montalvo & Marta Reynal-Querol, 2005.
"The Curse of Aid,"
Economics Working Papers
870, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
[Downloadable!]