IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/mathfi/v32y2022i1p172-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility‐based pricing and hedging of contingent claims in Almgren‐Chriss model with temporary price impact

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Ekren
  • Sergey Nadtochiy

Abstract

In this paper, we construct the utility‐based optimal hedging strategy for a European‐type option in the Almgren‐Chriss model with temporary price impact. The main mathematical challenge of this work stems from the degeneracy of the second order terms and the quadratic growth of the first‐order terms in the associated Hamilton‐Jacobi‐Bellman equation, which makes it difficult to establish sufficient regularity of the value function needed to construct the optimal strategy in a feedback form. By combining the analytic and probabilistic tools for describing the value function and the optimal strategy, we establish the feedback representation of the latter. We use this representation to derive an explicit asymptotic expansion of the utility indifference price of the option, which allows us to quantify the price impact in options' market via the price impact coefficient in the underlying market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Ekren & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2022. "Utility‐based pricing and hedging of contingent claims in Almgren‐Chriss model with temporary price impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 172-225, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:172-225
    DOI: 10.1111/mafi.12330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/mafi.12330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Guéant & Jiang Pu, 2017. "Option Pricing And Hedging With Execution Costs And Market Impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 803-831, July.
    2. Dylan Possamai & H. Mete Soner & Nizar Touzi, 2012. "Homogenization and asymptotics for small transaction costs: the multidimensional case," Papers 1212.6275, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2013.
    3. Ludovic Moreau & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & H. Mete Soner, 2017. "Trading With Small Price Impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 350-400, April.
    4. Nicolae Gârleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2013. "Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(6), pages 2309-2340, December.
    5. Paul Milgrom & Ilya Segal, 2002. "Envelope Theorems for Arbitrary Choice Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 583-601, March.
    6. Peter Bank & Dietmar Baum, 2004. "Hedging and Portfolio Optimization in Financial Markets with a Large Trader," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2015. "Option Pricing And Hedging With Small Transaction Costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 702-723, October.
    8. Liu, Hong & Yong, Jiongmin, 2005. "Option pricing with an illiquid underlying asset market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2125-2156, December.
    9. Gârleanu, Nicolae & Pedersen, Lasse Heje, 2016. "Dynamic portfolio choice with frictions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 487-516.
    10. H. Mete Soner & Nizar Touzi, 2012. "Homogenization and asymptotics for small transaction costs," Papers 1202.6131, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    11. Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, 2019. "Portfolio choice with small temporary and transient price impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1066-1115, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Dolinsky, 2022. "Duality Theory for Exponential Utility--Based Hedging in the Almgren--Chriss Model," Papers 2210.03917, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    2. Moritz Voß, 2022. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 6, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Ekren & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2019. "Utility-based pricing and hedging of contingent claims in Almgren-Chriss model with temporary price impact," Papers 1910.01778, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    2. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "A Primer on Portfolio Choice with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1612.01302, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    3. Erhan Bayraktar & Thomas Cayé & Ibrahim Ekren, 2021. "Asymptotics for small nonlinear price impact: A PDE approach to the multidimensional case," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 36-108, January.
    4. Lukas Gonon & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Xiaofei Shi, 2021. "Asset pricing with general transaction costs: Theory and numerics," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 595-648, April.
    5. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Stability of Radner equilibria with respect to small frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 443-502, April.
    6. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Equilibrium Returns with Transaction Costs," Post-Print hal-01569408, HAL.
    7. Lukas Gonon & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Xiaofei Shi, 2019. "Asset Pricing with General Transaction Costs: Theory and Numerics," Papers 1905.05027, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    8. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2021. "Deep Learning Algorithms for Hedging with Frictions," Papers 2111.01931, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    9. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2023. "Deep learning algorithms for hedging with frictions," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 113-147, March.
    10. Alain Bensoussan & Guiyuan Ma & Chi Chung Siu & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam, 2022. "Dynamic mean–variance problem with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 267-300, April.
    11. Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Portfolio Choice with Small Temporary and Transient Price Impact," Papers 1705.00672, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    12. Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2022. "Portfolio choice with return predictability and small trading frictions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Equilibrium returns with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 569-601, July.
    14. Peter Bank & Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, 2021. "Liquidity in competitive dealer markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 827-856, July.
    15. Cayé, Thomas & Herdegen, Martin & Muhle-Karbe, Johannes, 2020. "Scaling limits of processes with fast nonlinear mean reversion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(4), pages 1994-2031.
    16. Bruno Bouchard & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Simple Bounds for Transaction Costs," Working Papers hal-01711371, HAL.
    17. Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Marcel Nutz & Xiaowei Tan, 2020. "Asset pricing with heterogeneous beliefs and illiquidity," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1392-1421, October.
    18. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Xiaofei Shi & Chen Yang, 2020. "An Equilibrium Model for the Cross-Section of Liquidity Premia," Papers 2011.13625, arXiv.org.
    19. Jorge Guijarro-Ordonez, 2019. "High-dimensional statistical arbitrage with factor models and stochastic control," Papers 1901.09309, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    20. Filippo Passerini & Samuel E. Vazquez, 2015. "Optimal Trading with Alpha Predictors," Papers 1501.03756, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:172-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0960-1627 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.