IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v39y1986i3p377-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Model of the Political Economy of International Investment Sanctions: The Case of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • WILLIAM H. KAEMPFER
  • ANTON D. LOWENBERG

Abstract

Many advocates of sanctions against South Africa have proposed that such measures will reduce the wealth of white South Africans and thereby raise the costs of apartheid to those who benefit from it by such a large amount that whites will voluntarily choose to terminate the apartheid system. This paper examines the likely effects of disinvestment sanctions on the survivability of apartheid. An ‘interest‐group’ model of the South African state is developed, in which apartheid policies are treated as endogenous outcomes of a political decision‐making process. The effects of sanctions are introduced through the impact of international capital flows and asset prices on the major interest groups within the white electorate. It is shown that disinvestment policies may not diminish apartheid via market effects, but could have an impact upon the political costs of maintaining apartheid institutions. Viele Verteidiger von Sanktionen gegen Südafrika haben argumentiert, dass diese Massnahmen den Wohlstand der weissen Südafrikaner reduzieren und dabei die Kosten der Apartheid für diejenigen, die davon profitieren, so stark erhöhen, dass die Weissen sich freiwillig dafür entscheiden, das Apartheidssystem zu beenden. Dieser Artikel untersucht die möglichen Konsequenzen von Investitionssanktionen für die Überlebenschancen der Apartheid. Ein ≪Interessengruppen‐Modell≫ des Südafrikanischen Staates wird entwickelt, in dem Gesetze für Apartheid als endogene Resultate eines politischen Entscheidungsprozesses behandelt werden. Die Folgen von Sanktionen werden mittels der Auswirkungen der internationalen Kapitalströme und der Vermögenswerte auf die Hauptinteressengruppen unter der weissen Wählerschaft eingeführt. Es wird gezeigt, dass die Investitionssanktionen wahrscheinlich nicht über Markteffekte die Apartheid vermindern, sondern vielmehr eine Auswirkung auf die politischen Kosten, die Apartheid aufrechtzuerhalten, haben. De nombreuses personnes en faveur de sanctions ȩ l'encontre de l'Afrique du Sud ont prétendu que de telles mesures entrai̧neraient une diminution de la richesse des Sud‐Africains de couleur blanche et augmenteraient, de ce fait, les cou̧ts de l'apart‐heid pour ceux qui en bénéficient tellement que les ≪Blancs≫ abandonneraient volontairement le système de l'apartheid. Notre travail analyse les effets probables des sanctions de desinvestissement sur les chances de survie de l'apartheid. Un modèle représentant des ≪groupements d'intérȩts≫ de l'Etat Sud‐Africain, au sein duquel des politiques de 1'apartheid sont considérées en tant que conséquences endogènes d'un processus politique de prise de décision, est établi. Les répercussions des sanctions sont présentées par le biais de l'impact exercé par les flux de capitaux internationaux et le prix des biens sur les principaux groupements d'intérȩts au sein de l'électorat blanc. Il est démontré que des politiques de désinvestissement n'entrai̧nent pas forcement une diminution de 1'apartheid gra̧ce ȩ des effets de marché mais qu'elles peuvent avoir un effet sur le prix politique ȩ payer pour maintenir des institutions apartheid.

Suggested Citation

  • William H. Kaempfer & Anton D. Lowenberg, 1986. "A Model of the Political Economy of International Investment Sanctions: The Case of South Africa," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 377-396, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:39:y:1986:i:3:p:377-396
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00777.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00777.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00777.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Onderco & Reinout Arthur van der Veer, 2021. "No More Gouda in Moscow? Distributive Effects of the Imposition of Sanctions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1345-1363, November.
    2. Gutmann, Jerg & Neuenkirch, Matthias & Neumeier, Florian, 2022. "Do China and Russia Undermine US Sanctions? Evidence from DiD and Event Study Estimation," ILE Working Paper Series 64, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    3. Garoupa, Nuno R & Gata, Joao E, 2002. "A Theory of International Conflict Management and Sanctioning," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 110(1-2), pages 41-65, January.
    4. David Lektzian & Glen Biglaiser, 2014. "The effect of foreign direct investment on the use and success of US sanctions," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(1), pages 70-93, February.
    5. Sobel, Russell S, 1998. "Exchange Rate Evidence on the Effectiveness of United Nations Policy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 95(1-2), pages 1-25, April.
    6. William H. Kaempfer & Michael H. Moffett, 1988. "Impact Of Anti‐Apartheid Sanctions On South Africa: Some Trade And Financial Evidence," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 6(4), pages 118-129, October.
    7. Daniel Spiro, 2023. "Economic Warfare," CESifo Working Paper Series 10443, CESifo.
    8. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2009. "Economic Diplomacy and the Geography of International Trade," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13518.
    9. Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku & Mahadevan, Renuka, 2016. "The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Income Inequality of Target States," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-11.
    10. van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. & van Marrewijk, Charles, 1995. "Why do sanctions need time to work? Adjustment, learning and anticipation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 75-86, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:39:y:1986:i:3:p:377-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.