IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v54y2018i1p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single†Respondent Research Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas J. Kull
  • Josip Kotlar
  • Martin Spring

Abstract

Deciding on the number of respondents in a data†collection instrument is a key design consideration requiring supply chain researchers to balance multiple competing factors. The debate on this respondent design question may unintentionally disregard over 95% of enterprises engaged in supply chains: small and medium enterprises (SMEs). We present arguments for why single†respondent designs can be more appropriate in the SME setting, particularly when considering the various facets of supply chain management and the untapped potential of SCM†SME research. Assuring that SCM theoretical frameworks and research designs allow for SME inclusion will be important in aiding the SCM field to progress forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas J. Kull & Josip Kotlar & Martin Spring, 2018. "Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single†Respondent Research Designs," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(1), pages 23-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:54:y:2018:i:1:p:23-34
    DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12157
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jscm.12157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Miller & Keith Skowronski & John Saldanha, 2022. "Asset ownership & incentives to undertake non‐contractible actions: The case of trucking," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(1), pages 65-91, January.
    2. Seongtae Kim & Sangho Chae & Stephan M. Wagner & Jason W. Miller, 2022. "Buyer abusive behavior and supplier welfare: An empirical study of truck owner–operators," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 90-111, October.
    3. Desirée Knoppen & Louise Knight, 2022. "Pursuing sustainability advantage: The dynamic capabilities of born sustainable firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1789-1813, May.
    4. Jason Miller & Beth Davis‐Sramek & Brian S. Fugate & Mark Pagell & Barbara B. Flynn, 2021. "Editorial Commentary: Addressing Confusion in the Diffusion of Archival Data Research," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 130-146, July.
    5. Li, Miaomiao & Cao, Guikun & Cui, Li & Liu, Xiaoquan & Dai, Jing, 2023. "Examining how government subsidies influence firms’ circular supply chain management: The role of eco-innovation and top management team," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Bruno V. Miranda & Brent Ross & Jason Franken & Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Plural forms and differentiation strategies in the agri‐food sector: Evidence from the U.S. wine industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 486-504, July.
    7. Abdurrezzak Sener & Mehmet Barut & Ali Dag & Mehmet Bayram Yildirim, 2021. "Impact of commitment, information sharing, and information usage on supplier performance: a Bayesian belief network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 125-158, August.
    8. Khraishi, Ahmad & Huq, Fahian & Paulraj, Antony, 2020. "Offshoring innovation: An empirical investigation of dyadic complementarity within SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 86-97.
    9. Martin R. W. Hiebl & David I. Pielsticker, 2023. "Automation, organizational ambidexterity and the stability of employee relations: new tensions arising between corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management and stakeholder management," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1978-2006, December.
    10. Kostas Selviaridis & Martin Spring, 2022. "Fostering SME supplier‐enabled innovation in the supply chain: The role of innovation policy," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(1), pages 92-123, January.
    11. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & ElBaz, Jamal, 2020. "Can you hear the Eco? From SME environmental responsibility to social requirements in the supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Curado, Carla, 2022. "The effects of subsidiary’s leadership and entrepreneurship on international marketing knowledge transfer and new product development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    13. Tarifa Fernández, Jorge & Céspedes Lorente, José Joaquín & de Burgos Jiménez, Jerónimo, 2021. "Examining the moderating role of HIHRP in the relationship between external integration and productivity," MPRA Paper 120126, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2021.
    14. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders, 2023. "Adoption patterns and performance implications of Smart Maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    15. Savu Rovanto & Max Finne, 2023. "What Motivates Entrepreneurs into Circular Economy Action? Evidence from Japan and Finland," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 71-91, April.
    16. Eduardo Machado & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado & Antonio Márcio Tavares Thomé, 2021. "Barriers and Enablers for the Integration of Industry 4.0 and Sustainability in Supply Chains of MSMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Daniel Krause & Madeleine Pullman, 2021. "Fighting to survive: how supply chain managers navigate the emerging legal cannabis industry," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 50-71, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:54:y:2018:i:1:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.