IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v58y2018i1p259-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable energy innovations and sustainability transition: How relevant are spatial spillovers?

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Noseleit

Abstract

In the societal challenge to switch to renewable energy, innovation has become an ever†increasing critical determinant. However, while sustainability transition is a global challenge, diffusion and adoption of innovation tends to be uneven in space and unequal access may cause substantial heterogeneity in energy transition. This research analyzes how domestic and foreign innovation activities in the renewable energy sector influence energy transition over time. Empirical testing shows that a country's domestic innovation activity impacts renewable electricity generation capacity sooner than foreign technological innovations. I document that there are substantial barriers to substitute foreign technologies for domestic innovation efforts in the short run but also observe that foreign technologies have a stronger impact after some years. These findings have implications for cross†border coordination of governmental innovation support and complementary policy instruments that aim at increasing adoption speed across borders.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Noseleit, 2018. "Renewable energy innovations and sustainability transition: How relevant are spatial spillovers?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 259-275, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:58:y:2018:i:1:p:259-275
    DOI: 10.1111/jors.12340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12340
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jors.12340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zdenka Myslikova & Amy Jaffe & Kelly Sims Gallagher, 2022. "Shielding and expanding Mission Innovation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 779-781, September.
    2. Smith Weaver & Kotch Wolf & Hartmann Werner, 2018. "The Effect of Distributed Generators on Environment toward Sustainability," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 9(5), pages 153-155, April.
    3. Nan, Shijing & Huo, Yuchen & You, Wanhai & Guo, Yawei, 2022. "Globalization spatial spillover effects and carbon emissions: What is the role of economic complexity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Caragliu, Andrea, 2021. "Energy efficiency-enhancing policies and firm performance: Evidence from the paper and glass industries in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Wang, Haoying, 2020. "The economic impact of oil and gas development in the Permian Basin: Local and spillover effects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Shirley Thompson, 2023. "Strategic Analysis of the Renewable Electricity Transition: Power to the World without Carbon Emissions?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-34, August.
    7. Limei Ma & Qianying Wang & Dan Shi & Qinglong Shao, 2023. "Spatiotemporal patterns and determinants of renewable energy innovation: Evidence from a province-level analysis in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Sung, Bongsuk & Soh, Jin Young & Park, Chun Gun, 2022. "Comparing government support, firm heterogeneity, and inter-firm spillovers for productivity enhancement: Evidence from the Korean solar energy technology industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Jianhua Zhang & Xiaolong Liu & Dimitris Ballas, 2023. "Spatial and relational peer effects on environmental behavioral imitation," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(4), pages 575-599, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:58:y:2018:i:1:p:259-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.