IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v58y2020i6p1540-1557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parliamentary Influence Ten Years after Lisbon: EU Trade Negotiations with Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Frennhoff Larsén

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty altered the way EU trade negotiations are conducted, by granting new powers to the European Parliament (EP), including ratification powers. Ten years after the Treaty entered into force, this article evaluates the parliamentary influence on EU trade negotiations, both in terms substantial and procedural matters, by analyzing the trade negotiations between the EU and Japan that lead to the Economic Partnership Agreement. Using an embedded two‐level game approach, the paper argues that parliamentary influence has been significant, and that the EP has developed into a constructive and experienced actor. It has changed the inter‐institutional dynamics, and it plays an increasingly influential role internationally through cross‐table engagement with the EU's negotiating partners. In addition, EU trade negotiations are embedded in a network of past, parallel and future negotiations, which shaped the strategies of the EP, and the nature and progress of the negotiations overall.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Frennhoff Larsén, 2020. "Parliamentary Influence Ten Years after Lisbon: EU Trade Negotiations with Japan," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1540-1557, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:6:p:1540-1557
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, Alasdair R. & Peterson, John, 2014. "Parochial Global Europe: 21st Century Trade Politics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199579907.
    2. Manfred Elsig, 2007. "The EU's Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45, pages 927-948, November.
    3. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 427-460, July.
    4. Manfred Elsig, 2007. "The EU's Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 927-948, November.
    5. David Kleimann, 2011. "Taking Stock: EU Common Commercial Policy in the Lisbon Era," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 66(2), pages 211-257, June.
    6. Nye, Joseph S. & Keohane, Robert O., 1971. "Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 329-349, July.
    7. Evelyn Coremans, 2017. "From Access to Documents to Consumption of Information: The European Commission Transparency Policy for the TTIP Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 29-39.
    8. Nye, Joseph S. & Keohane, Robert O., 1971. "Transnational Relations and World Politics: A Conclusion," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 721-748, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugénia Da Conceição, 2010. "Who Controls Whom? Dynamics of Power Delegation and Agency Losses in EU Trade Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 1107-1126, September.
    2. Tony Mueller, 2023. "When policy entrepreneurs drift between levels: The creation of the International Renewable Energy Agency," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 588-599, September.
    3. Stella Ladi & Dimitris Tsarouhas, 2017. "International diffusion of regulatory governance: EU actorness in public procurement," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 388-403, December.
    4. Daniel Munyoki Nduti & Rev. Sgt. (Rtd). Dr. Elijah Onyango Standslause Odhiambo, 2020. "Mechanisms of Curbing Smuggling of Food Commodities from Uganda into Busia Town, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(11), pages 122-137, November.
    5. Eric Tremolada & Carlos Tassara & Olivier Costa, 2019. "Colombia y la Unión Europea. Una asociación cada vez más estrecha," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1101, October.
    6. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    7. Milton Fernando Montoya Pardo, 2020. "Temas de Derecho Minero-Energético. Colección de Regulación Minera y Energética No. 14," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1266, October.
    8. Kristian Berg Harpviken, 2012. "The transnationalization of the Taliban," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 203-229, September.
    9. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2020. "Transnational cooperation in times of rapid global changes: The Arctic Council as a success case?," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Francesca Batzella, 2021. "The Role of the Commission in Intergovernmental Agreements in the Field of Energy. A Foot in the Door Technique?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 745-761, July.
    11. Luis Alfonso Dau & Elizabeth M. Moore & Jonathan P. Doh & Margaret A. Soto, 2022. "Does global integration stimulate corporate citizenship? The effect of international trade agreements and regulatory quality on state and private firm adoption of CSR standards," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 328-352, September.
    12. Katharina Luise Meissner, 2016. "A case of failed interregionalism? Analyzing the EU-ASEAN free trade agreement negotiations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 319-336, September.
    13. Thomas Hale & David Held & Kevin Young, 2013. "Gridlock: From Self-reinforcing Interdependence to Second-order Cooperation Problems," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(3), pages 223-235, September.
    14. Eugénia Da Conceição, 2010. "Who Controls Whom? Dynamics of Power Delegation and Agency Losses in EU Trade Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1107-1126, September.
    15. Zhidkova Tatiana, 2015. "Globalization and the Emergence of Violent Non-state Actors: The Case of Human Trafficking," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Asif Efrat & Abraham L. Newman, 2020. "Intolerant justice: ethnocentrism and transnational-litigation frameworks," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 271-299, January.
    17. Whytock Christopher A., 2010. "Private-Public Interaction in Global Governance: The Case of Transnational Commercial Arbitration," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Oscar Widerberg & Frank Laerhoven, 2014. "Measuring the autonomous influence of an international bureaucracy: the Division for Sustainable Development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 303-327, November.
    19. Romanova, Tatiana, 2014. "Russian energy in the EU market: Bolstered institutionsand their effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 44-53.
    20. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991. "Koordination durch Verhandlungssysteme: Analytische Konzepte und institutionelle Lösungen am Beispiel der Zusammenarbeit zwischen zwei Bundesländern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:6:p:1540-1557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.