IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v54y2016i1p136-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postmodern EU? Integration between Alternative Horizons and Territorial Angst

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Borg
  • Thomas Diez

Abstract

In the early 1990s, John Ruggie famously referred to the European Community as an emerging ‘postmodern polity’. This article elaborates on the ‘postmodern promise’ of European integration that Ruggie invoked, and formulates such a promise of European integration as one of radically breaking with the violent practices characteristic of the modern state. We argue that such a promise is immanent albeit historically marginalized in the project of European integration itself, exemplified in the article with a tradition called integral federalism. The article then evaluates such a ‘postmodern promise’ in current practices of European integration against the background of a poststructuralist-informed critique of the violent effects of desires for bordered entities and identities. Such a poststructuralist sensibility enables the article to point to the problems of ‘scaling up’ the state in a project of integration that also set out to challenge and subvert its organizing principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Borg & Thomas Diez, 2016. "Postmodern EU? Integration between Alternative Horizons and Territorial Angst," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 136-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:54:y:2016:i:1:p:136-151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12327
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1993. "Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 139-174, January.
    2. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    3. Michael Merlingen, 2011. "From Governance to Governmentality in CSDP: Towards a Foucauldian Research Agenda," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 149-169, January.
    4. Dominika Biegoń, 2013. "Specifying the Arena of Possibilities: Post-structuralist Narrative Analysis and the E uropean Commission's Legitimation Strategies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 194-211, March.
    5. Ian Manners & Richard Whitman, 2016. "Another Theory is Possible: Dissident Voices in Theorising Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 3-18, January.
    6. Diez, Thomas & Stetter, Stephan & Albert, Mathias, 2006. "The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 563-593, July.
    7. Andrew W. Neal, 2009. "Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 333-356, March.
    8. Andrew W. Neal, 2009. "Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 333-356, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Wolff & David Gazsi & Daniela Huber & Nora Fisher‐Onar, 2022. "How to Reflexively Decentre EU Foreign Policy: Dissonance and Contrapuntal Reconstruction in Migration, Religious and Neighbourhood Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1611-1628, November.
    2. Stephan Klose, 2023. "Does the EU have friends?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 579-596, May.
    3. Piotr Toczyski, 2021. "Pan-European institutions and new media: pan-European or counter-pan-European media usage?," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 223-240, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Merlingen, 2011. "From Governance to Governmentality in CSDP: Towards a Foucauldian Research Agenda," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 149-169, January.
    2. Said TOPAL & Branislav Radeljic, 2023. "Does “Fortress Europe” have an alternative? EU member states between solidarity and national interests," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 14, pages 79-103, June.
    3. Trym N. Fjørtoft, 2022. "More power, more control: The legitimizing role of expertise in Frontex after the refugee crisis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 557-571, April.
    4. Didier Bigo & Elspeth Guild, 2019. "International Law and European Migration Policy: Where Is the Terrorism Risk?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Ulrich Krotz, 2009. "Momentum and Impediments: Why Europe Won't Emerge as a Full Political Actor on the World Stage Soon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 555-578, June.
    6. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    7. Virginie Mamadouh & Luiza Bialasiewicz & Xavier Ferrer-Gallardo & Olivier Thomas Kramsch, 2016. "Revisiting Al-Idrissi: The Eu and the (Euro)Mediterranean Archipelago Frontier," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(2), pages 162-176, April.
    8. Raffaella A. Del Sarto, 2014. "Defining Borders and People in the Borderlands: EU Policies, Israeli Prerogatives and the Palestinians," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 200-216, March.
    9. Atsuko Higashino, 2016. "A partnership postponed? Japan–EU cooperation in conflict resolution in East Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 435-447, December.
    10. Ian Manners & Philomena Murray, 2016. "The End of a Noble Narrative? European Integration Narratives after the Nobel Peace Prize," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 185-202, January.
    11. Andrew Geddes and Andrew Taylor, 2013. "Those Who Knock on Europe's Door Must Repent? Bilateral Border Disputes and EU Enlargement," KFG Working Papers p0054, Free University Berlin.
    12. Yeikyoung Kim, 2016. "The European Union, regional integration, and conflict transformation in the South China Sea territorial disputes," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 383-399, December.
    13. Bastian Vollmer, 2012. "Making light of borders: The case of the external EU border," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 9(2), pages 131-140, May.
    14. Moosung Lee, 2016. "The EU, regional cooperation, and the North Korean nuclear crisis," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 401-415, December.
    15. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    16. Giuseppe Campesi, 2011. "The Arab Spring and the Crisis of the European Border Regime: Manufacturing Emergency in the Lampedusa Crisis," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 59, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    17. Tausch, Arno, 2015. "Europe’s Refugee Crisis. Zur aktuellen politischen Ökonomie von Migration, Asyl und Integration in Europa [Europe's Refugee Crisis. On the current political economy of migration, asylum and integra," MPRA Paper 67400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Anne Jenichen, 2022. "The Politics of Normative Power Europe: Norm Entrepreneurs and Contestation in the Making of EU External Human Rights Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1299-1315, September.
    19. Stephan Keukeleire & Sharon Lecocq & Frédéric Volpi, 2021. "Decentring Norms in EU Relations with the Southern Neighbourhood," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 891-908, July.
    20. Rocco Bellanova & Marieke de Goede, 2022. "Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1316-1334, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:54:y:2016:i:1:p:136-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.