IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v9y2012i2p131-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making light of borders: The case of the external EU border

Author

Listed:
  • Bastian Vollmer

    (Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK)

Abstract

The notion of borders will be questioned in this paper by depicting an ethnographic journey from which a counter-discourse emerged, a discourse that contradicts with the currently acknowledged discourses of borders. Border dis-courses are dominated by security and threat, by the meaning of the bulwark that surrounds nation states in physical, legal, political and ideational terms. Scholars have examined borders from various different perspectives and within the framework of different disciplines; academic discourses have emerged over the years (such as on securitisation), while national governments across the globe as well as the European Union (EU) attempted to seal their permeable borders. They have introduced ever more legal obstacles and enforcement measures to put their goal into practice: preserving sovereignty. The commonly acknowledged discourses on borders will not be challenged per se in its exist-ence, but empirical data will be used to demonstrate a different account of the notion of borders. This account makes light of the notion of borders as travellers followed their everyday business and dealt with the bulwark of the EU, the EU external border, with ease and amusement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastian Vollmer, 2012. "Making light of borders: The case of the external EU border," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 9(2), pages 131-140, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:131-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.tplondon.com/index.php/ml/article/viewFile/125/111
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Phillips & Moira Dustin, 2004. "UK Initiatives on Forced Marriage: Regulation, Dialogue and Exit," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 531-551, October.
    2. Andrew W. Neal, 2009. "Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 333-356, March.
    3. Anne Phillips & Moira Dustin, 2004. "UK Initiatives on Forced Marriage: Regulation, Dialogue and Exit," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52, pages 531-551, October.
    4. Andrew W. Neal, 2009. "Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 333-356, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Said TOPAL & Branislav Radeljic, 2023. "Does “Fortress Europe” have an alternative? EU member states between solidarity and national interests," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 14, pages 79-103, June.
    2. Alexia Sabbe & Karima Boujaddayni & Marleen Temmerman & Els Leye, 2019. "Marriage and Migration: Moroccan Women’s Views on Partner Choice, Arranged and Forced Marriage in Belgium," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1097-1120, November.
    3. Trym N. Fjørtoft, 2022. "More power, more control: The legitimizing role of expertise in Frontex after the refugee crisis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 557-571, April.
    4. Didier Bigo & Elspeth Guild, 2019. "International Law and European Migration Policy: Where Is the Terrorism Risk?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Virginie Mamadouh & Luiza Bialasiewicz & Xavier Ferrer-Gallardo & Olivier Thomas Kramsch, 2016. "Revisiting Al-Idrissi: The Eu and the (Euro)Mediterranean Archipelago Frontier," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(2), pages 162-176, April.
    6. Giuseppe Campesi, 2011. "The Arab Spring and the Crisis of the European Border Regime: Manufacturing Emergency in the Lampedusa Crisis," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 59, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    7. Tausch, Arno, 2015. "Europe’s Refugee Crisis. Zur aktuellen politischen Ökonomie von Migration, Asyl und Integration in Europa [Europe's Refugee Crisis. On the current political economy of migration, asylum and integra," MPRA Paper 67400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Michael Merlingen, 2011. "From Governance to Governmentality in CSDP: Towards a Foucauldian Research Agenda," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 149-169, January.
    9. Rocco Bellanova & Marieke de Goede, 2022. "Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1316-1334, September.
    10. Trym Nohr Fjørtoft & Hallvard Sandven, 2023. "Symmetry in the Delegation of Power as a Legitimacy Criterion," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 900-916, July.
    11. Burcu Togral Koca, 2015. "Deconstructing Turkey's Open Door Policy towards Refugees from Syria," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 12(3), pages 209-225, September.
    12. Stefan Borg & Thomas Diez, 2016. "Postmodern EU? Integration between Alternative Horizons and Territorial Angst," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 136-151, January.
    13. Bilgic, A. & Gasper, D.R. & Wilcock, C.A., 2020. "A necessary complement to human rights: a human security perspective on migration to Europe," ISS Working Papers - General Series 128107, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:131-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.