IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v42y1991i3p298-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives On Agricultural Biotechnology Research For Small Countries

Author

Listed:
  • R.W. Herdt

Abstract

The Rockefeller Foundation currently provides about 7.0 million annually for a comprehensive programme of rice biotechnology research designed to meet the needs of the developing world. Early in the programme deliberate decisions were made by the Foundation to support all the components of research required to make new varieties ready for testing, from determining what plant traits should receive priority to strategic technique development through the incorporation of traits into varieties. Agricultural biotechnology research is risky, high‐cost relative to other agricultural research, has a long time lag to payoff, and requires efficiently functioning ‘conventional’ research to be effective. Most small developing countries do not have the conditions necessary to make productive investments in agricultural biotechnology, except possibly for sharply defined tissue‐culture activities. A wise use of funds would be to concentrate on producing enough indigenous talent to give knowledgeable advice to policy makers on the costs, time lags and possible benefits of agricultural biotechnology.

Suggested Citation

  • R.W. Herdt, 1991. "Perspectives On Agricultural Biotechnology Research For Small Countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 298-308, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:42:y:1991:i:3:p:298-308
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1991.tb00356.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1991.tb00356.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1991.tb00356.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. A. Araji & R. J. Sim & R. L. Gardner, 1978. "Returns to Agricultural Research and Extension Programs: An Ex-Ante Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(5), pages 964-968.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eicher, Carl K. & Maredia, Karim & Sithole-Niang, Idah, 2006. "Crop biotechnology and the African farmer," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 504-527, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. White, Fred C. & Araji, A.A., 1990. "An Analysis Of Experiment Station Funding Decisions," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-9, December.
    2. A. A. Araji, 1990. "The functions, focus, and productivity of the state agricultural experiment stations in the United States," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 633-642.
    3. Norton, George W. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1981. "The Use Of Genetics Principles In Research Evaluation: An Example With Soybeans," Staff Papers 14187, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Araji, A. A. & White, F. C. & Guenthner, J. F., 1994. "Return To Potato Research," A.E. Research Series 305115, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Scobie, Grant M., 1984. "Investment in Agricultural Research: Some Economic Principles," Economics Working Papers 232447, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    6. Pope, C. Arden, III, 1981. "The dynamics of crop yields in the U. S. Corn Belt as effected by weather and technological progress," ISU General Staff Papers 198101010800008463, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Azam, Qazi Tauqir & Bloom, Erik A. & Evenson, Robert E., 1991. "Agricultural Research Productivity in Pakistan," Center Discussion Papers 321325, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    8. Kelley, T. G. & Ryan, J. G. & Patel, B. K., 1995. "Applied participatory priority setting in international agricultural research: Making trade-offs transparent and explicit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 177-216.
    9. Araji, A. A. & Hafez, S., 2001. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Investment In Agricultural Biotechnology Research," A.E. Research Series 305028, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    10. Marasas, C. N. & Smale, M. & Singh, R. P., 2003. "The economic impact of productivity maintenance research: breeding for leaf rust resistance in modern wheat," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 253-263, December.
    11. Araji, A. A. & Guenthner, J., 2002. "Genetically Modified (Gm) Foods: Consumers' And Producers' Perceptions And The Economic - Environmental Benefits," A.E. Research Series 305032, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    12. Farrell E. Jensen & C. Arden Pope, 1987. "The changing structure of US agriculture and implications for research in agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 139-150.
    13. Araji, A. A., 2001. "Functions, Resource Allocation, And The Productivity Of The State Agricultural Experiment Station," A.E. Research Series 305027, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    14. Sparger, John Adam & Norton, George W. & Heisey, Paul W. & Alwang, Jeffrey, 2013. "Is the share of agricultural maintenance research rising in the United States?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 126-135.
    15. Araji, A. A. & Guenthner, J., 2001. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Investments In The Development And Adoption Of Genetically Modified Potato," A.E. Research Series 305029, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:42:y:1991:i:3:p:298-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.