IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v19y2020i1p41-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Agricultural Land Market in the EU and the Case for Better Data Provision

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Loughrey
  • Trevor Donnellan
  • Kevin Hanrahan

Abstract

Participants in agricultural land markets require comprehensive statistics in order to make informed decisions in relation to agricultural land and the associated production. The publication of such data supports land mobility, the competitiveness and generational renewal of the sector. This article describes the functioning of agricultural land markets in EU Member States and the associated data infrastructure. We identify a scarcity of information regarding the volume of land sales transactions but significant recent improvements in the reporting of comparable statistics on agricultural land sales prices. Wide disparities between Member States both in terms of their agricultural land sales and agricultural land rental markets are documented. There remain significant data gaps in terms of land rental prices in EU Member States. Further EU‐wide research should be carried out in relation to land rental price indices with adjustments for the underlying land characteristics. The resulting price indices should provide a better indication of the competitiveness of land markets in EU regions. Finally, the analysis identifies recent improvements in measuring the extent of land fragmentation in the EU but finds that this analysis is confined to a minority of Member States. Les participants aux marchés du foncier agricole ont besoin de statistiques complètes pour prendre des décisions éclairées concernant les terres agricoles et la production associée. La publication de telles données aide à la mobilité des terres, et à la compétitivité et le renouvellement générationnel du secteur. Cet article décrit le fonctionnement des marchés du foncier agricole dans les États membres de l'Union européenne et l'infrastructure des données afférentes. Nous trouvons que les informations concernant le volume des transactions foncières sont rares, mais que la déclaration de statistiques comparables sur les prix de vente des terres agricoles s'est nettement améliorée. Des disparités importantes apparaissent entre les États membres à la fois sur les marchés de la vente de terres agricoles et ceux de la location. Il existe encore des lacunes importantes sur les prix de location des terrains dans les États membres de l'Union européenne. Il faudrait à l’échelle de l'Union européenne mener des recherches plus poussées sur les indices de prix de location des terrains avec des ajustements selon les caractéristiques des terrains. Les indices de prix résultants devraient fournir une meilleure indication de la compétitivité des marchés fonciers dans les régions européennes. Enfin, selon l'analyse, qui ne porte que sur une minorité d’États membres, la mesure de l'ampleur de la fragmentation des terres dans l'Union européenne s'est récemment améliorée. Die am landwirtschaftlichen Bodenmarkt Beteiligten benötigen umfassende Statistiken, um fundierte Entscheidungen in Bezug auf landwirtschaftliche Flächen und die damit verbundene Produktion treffen zu können. Eine Veröffentlichung dieser Daten würde die Mobilität der Flächen, die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und den Generationswechsel im landwirtschaftlichen Sektor unterstützen. Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Funktionsweise der landwirtschaftlichen Bodenmärkte und die damit verbundene Dateninfrastruktur in den EU‐Mitgliedstaaten. Wir haben einen Mangel an Informationen über den Umfang an Grundstücksverkäufen identifiziert, konnten aber in letzter Zeit beachtliche Verbesserungen bezüglich der Veröffentlichung vergleichbarer Statistiken zu Verkaufspreisen für landwirtschaftliche Flächen feststellen. Es konnten große Unterschiede zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten sowohl bei den Verkäufen von landwirtschaftlichen Flächen als auch bei der Verpachtung ausgemacht werden. Ebenso bestehen in den EU‐Mitgliedstaaten nach wie vor erhebliche Datenlücken bei den Pachtpreisen für Boden. Daher sollten zusätzliche EU‐weite Untersuchungen in Bezug auf die Pachtpreisindizes mit Anpassungen an die zugrunde liegenden Bodenmerkmale durchgeführt werden. Die daraus resultierenden Preisindizes sollten dann einen besseren Indikator für die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Bodenmärkte in den EU‐Regionen liefern. Abschließend werden in der Untersuchung die jüngsten Verbesserungen bei der Messung des Ausmaßes der Fragmentierung von landwirtschaftlichen Flächen in der EU identifiziert. Dabei stellen wir aber gleichzeitig fest, dass sich die Analyse nur auf eine Minderheit von Mitgliedstaaten beschränkt.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Loughrey & Trevor Donnellan & Kevin Hanrahan, 2020. "The Agricultural Land Market in the EU and the Case for Better Data Provision," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 41-47, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:41-47
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Maria Espinosa, 2018. "The Impact of the 2013 CAP Reform on the Decoupled Payments’ Capitalisation into Land Values," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 306-337, June.
    2. Johan Swinnen & Kristine Van Herck & Liesbet Vranken, 2016. "The Diversity of Land Markets and Regulations in Europe, and (some of) its Causes," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 186-205, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2021. "The Case for Long-Term Land Leasing: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Onofri, Laura & Trestini, Samuele & Mamine, Fateh & Loughrey, Jason, 2022. "Understanding the Agricultural Land Leasing Market in Ireland: A Transaction Cost Approach," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321211, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    3. Plogmann, Jana & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Farmland sales under returns and price uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Marlene Kionka & Martin Odening & Jana Plogmann & Matthias Ritter, 2021. "Measuring liquidity in agricultural land markets," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 82(4), pages 690-713, September.
    5. Tretiak, Anton & Moskalenko, Anatolii & Tretiak, Valentina & Moskalenko, Valentyna & Tretiak, Nataliia, 2022. "Agricultural land turnover in Ukraine: state, features and problems," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    6. Laura Onofri & Samuele Trestini & Fateh Mamine & Jason Loughrey, 2023. "Understanding agricultural land leasing in Ireland: a transaction cost approach," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Jarmila Lazíková & Ľubica Rumanovská & Ivan Takáč & Piotr Prus & Alexander Fehér, 2021. "Regional Differences of Agricultural Land Market in Slovakia: A Challenge for Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Henning Schaak & Luise Meissner & Oliver Musshoff, 2023. "New insights on regional differences of the farmland price structure: An extended replication study on the parcel size–price relationship," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1427-1449, September.
    9. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry & Paul Caskie, 2023. "Barriers and Enablers of Long‐term Land Leasing: a Case Study of Northern Ireland," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(2), pages 20-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raushan Bokusheva & Lukáš Čechura & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2023. "Estimating persistent and transient technical efficiency and their determinants in the presence of heterogeneity and endogeneity," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 450-472, June.
    2. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia & Loughrey, Jason, 2023. "The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    4. Ciaian, Pavel & Espinosa, Maria & Louhichi, Kamel & Perni, Angel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2018. "Farm level impacts of abolishing the CAP direct payments: An assessment using the IFM-CAP model," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 272087, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Garrone, Maria & Emmers, Dorien & Olper, Alessandro & Swinnen, Johan, 2019. "Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Zuzana Hloušková & Michaela Lekešová & Anna Prajerová & Tomáš Doucha, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Agricultural Holdings with the Inclusion of Opportunity Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2018. "Does the basic payment efficiently enhance farm incomes? Evidences from Italy," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271957, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Mangirdas Morkunas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "In a Search for Equity: Do Direct Payments under the Common Agricultural Policy Induce Convergence in the European Union?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Leonhardt, Heidi & Penker, Marianne & Salhofer, Klaus, 2019. "Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 228-239.
    10. Lin, Wensheng & Huang, Jikun, 2021. "Impacts of agricultural incentive policies on land rental prices: New evidence from China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Ciaian, Pavel & Espinosa, Maria & Louhichi, Kamel & Perni, Angel, 2020. "Farm Level Impacts of Trade Liberalisation and CAP Removal Across EU: An Assessment using the IFM-CAP Model," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 69(2), May.
    12. Pappalardo, Gioacchino & West, Grant Howard & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Toscano, Sabrina & Pecorino, Biagio, 2022. "The effect of a UNESCO world heritage site designation on willingness to pay to preserve an agri-environmental good: The case of the dry stone walls in Mt. Etna," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Moretti, Michele & Vanschoenwinkel, Janka & Van Passel, Steven, 2021. "Accounting for externalities in cross-sectional economic models of climate change impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. José-Luis Alfaro-Navarro & María-Encarnación Andrés-Martínez, 2021. "A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of the distribution of Common Agricultural Policy aids in European countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(9), pages 351-362.
    15. Emma Bruno & Rosalia Castellano & Gennaro Punzo & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Towards diverging land prices in agricultural districts? Evidence from Italy before and after the great crisis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 119-127.
    16. Yajun Ma & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Yong Zhou & Sidong Zhao, 2022. "A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Lehn, Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Analysis of factors influencing standard farmland values with regard to stronger interventions in the German farmland market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 138-146.
    18. Dominik Noll & Christian Lauk & Veronika Gaube & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2020. "Caught in a Deadlock: Small Ruminant Farming on the Greek Island of Samothrace. The Importance of Regional Contexts for Effective EU Agricultural Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Laurence Delattre & Marta Debolini & Jean Christophe Paoli & Claude Napoleone & Michel Moulery & Lara Leonelli & Pierre Santucci, 2020. "Understanding the Relationships between Extensive Livestock Systems, Land-Cover Changes, and CAP Support in Less-Favored Mediterranean Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Pavel Ciaian & Dusan Drabik & Jan Falkowski & d'Artis Kancs, 2016. "Market Impacts of New Land Market Regulations in Eastern EU Member States," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2016/02, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:41-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.